PLR 200223069: Couple receives time to recharacterize Roth conversions left incomplete
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A married couple converted traditional IRAs to Roth IRAs in 1998 despite income above the then applicable conversion limit. An accountant attempted to reverse the conversions in 1999, but the couple and their financial advisor were not properly notified, and the Roth IRA custodian still showed the accounts as Roth IRAs. After another accountant discovered the problem, the couple requested relief. The IRS found that the request preceded its own discovery and that the couple had reasonably relied on professional advice. It granted six months from the ruling date under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to recharacterize the two Roth IRAs as traditional IRAs.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the couple complete recharacterization of ineligible 1998 Roth conversions after the special deadlines?
- Outcome: Approved; a six-month extension was granted.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 408A(c)(3), 408A(d)(6); Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3; Announcements 99-57 and 99-104.
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
200223069
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
UIC: 9100.00-00
MAR 13 2002
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
T:EP:RA:T2
LEGEND:
Taxpayer A = ***
Taxpayer B = ***
Accountant C = ***
IRA U = ***
IRA V = ***
IRA W = ***
IRA X = ***
Company M = ***
Company N = ***
Sum O = ***
Sum P = ***
Dear ***:
This is in response to the *** letter, submitted by your authorized representative, as supplemented by correspondence dated , , *** and ***, in which you request relief under section 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations (“the Regulations”). The following facts and representations support your ruling request.
Taxpayer A maintained IRA U, an individual retirement account described in section 408(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) with Company M. Taxpayer B maintained IRA W, an individual retirement account described in section 408(a) of the Code with Company M. In April, 1998, on the advice of an investment advisor, Taxpayers A and B converted IRAs U and W to Roth IRAs V and X, respectively, with Company N.
Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B filed a joint Federal Income Tax Return for calendar year 1998. In 1999, when their Federal Income Tax Return for 1998 was being prepared, the accountant realized that Taxpayers A and B were not eligible to convert their traditional IRAs U and W to Roth IRAs V and X because their adjusted gross income for 1998 exceeded the limit found at section 408A(c)(3)(B) of the Code. In 1999, an effort was made by the accountant to recharacterize the Roth IRAs to traditional IRAs, but
XXXXXXXXXXX Page - 2 - 200223069
Taxpayer A, Taxpayer B and their financial advisor were not properly advised or notified of this effort to recharacterize.
Accountant C became the accountant for Taxpayers A and B in 2000. Accountant C realized that Taxpayers A and B were not eligible to convert their traditional IRAs U and W to Roth IRAs and promptly notified Taxpayers A and B and their financial advisor. Their financial advisor did not notify Company N of the recharacterization. Company N still shows the accounts as Roth IRAs.
Prior to the end of the 1999 calendar year, Taxpayers A and B were unaware that they were ineligible to convert their traditional IRAs U and W to Roth IRAs V and X. As a result, prior to the end of the 1999 calendar year, they were also unaware of the time limits found in Announcements 99-57 and 99-104 for recharacterizing an amount that had been converted from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA.
Taxpayers A and B timely filed their calendar year 1998 Federal Income Tax Return.
Based on the above, you, through your authorized representative, request the following letter ruling:
That, pursuant to section 301.9100-3 of the regulations, Taxpayers A and B are granted a period not to exceed six months from the date of this ruling letter to recharacterize their Roth
IRAs, IRA V and IRA X, respectfully, to traditional IRAs.
With respect to your request for relief under section 301.9100-3 of the regulations, section 408A(d)(6) of the Code and section 1.408A-5 of the Income Tax Regulations (“I.T. Regulations”) provide that, except as otherwise provided by the Secretary, a taxpayer may elect to recharacterize an IRA contribution made to one type of IRA as having been made to another type of IRA by making a trustee-to-trustee transfer of the IRA contribution, plus earnings, to the other type of IRA. In a recharacterization, the IRA contribution is treated as having been made to the transferee IRA and not the transferor IRA. Under section 408A(d)(6) and section 1.408A-5, this recharacterization election generally must occur on or before the date prescribed by law, including extensions, for filing the taxpayer's federal income tax returns for the year of contributions.
Section 1.408A-5, Question and Answer-6 of the I.T. Regulations, describes how a taxpayer makes the election to recharacterize the IRA contribution. To recharacterize an amount that has been converted from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA: (1) the taxpayer must notify the Roth IRA trustee of the taxpayer's intent to recharacterize the amount, (2) the taxpayer must provide the trustee (and the transferee trustee, if different from the transferor trustee) with specified information that is sufficient to effect the recharacterization, and (3) the trustee must make the transfer.
XXXXXXXXXXX Page - 3 - 200223069
Code section 408A(c)(3), provides, in relevant part, that an individual with adjusted gross income (“AGI”) in excess of $100,000 for a taxable year is not permitted to make a qualified rollover contribution to a Roth IRA from an individual retirement plan other than a Roth IRA during that taxable year.
Section 1.408A-4, Q&A-2 of the I.T. Regulations, provides, in summary, that an individual with modified adjusted gross income in excess of $100,000 for a taxable year is not permitted to convert an amount to a Roth IRA during that taxable year. Section 1.408A-4, Q&A-2, further provides, in summary, that an individual and his spouse must file a joint Federal Tax Return to convert a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA, and that the modified adjusted gross income subject to the $100,000 limit for a taxable year is the modified AGI derived from the joint return using the couple’s combined income.
Sections 301.9100-1, 301.9100-2, and 301.9100-3 of the regulations, in general, provide guidance concerning requests for relief submitted to the Service on or after December 31, 1997. Section 301.9100-1(c) of the regulations provides that the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, in his discretion, may grant a reasonable extension of the time fixed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, a revenue procedure, a notice, or an announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin for the making of an election or application for relief in respect of tax under, among others, Subtitle A of the Code.
Section 301.9100-2 of the regulations lists certain elections for which automatic extensions of time to file are granted. Section 301.9100-3 of the regulations generally provides guidance with respect to the granting of relief with respect to those elections not referenced in section 301.9100-2. The relief requested in this case is not referenced in section 301.9100-2.
Section 301.9100-3 of the regulations provides that applications for relief that fall within section 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides sufficient evidence (including affidavits described in section 301.9100-3(e)(2)) to establish that (1) the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and (2) granting relief would not prejudice the interests of the government.
Section 301.9100-3(b)(1) of the regulations provides that a taxpayer will be deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith (i) if its request for section 301.9100-1 relief is filed before the failure to make a timely election is discovered by the Service; (ii) if the taxpayer inadvertently failed to make the election because of intervening events beyond the taxpayer’s control; (iii) if the taxpayer failed to make the election because, after exercising reasonable diligence, the taxpayer was unaware of the necessity for the election; (iv) the taxpayer reasonably relied upon the written advice of the Service; or (v) the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.
XXXXXXXXXXX Page - 4 - 200223069
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) of the regulations provides that ordinarily the interests of the government will be treated as prejudiced and that ordinarily the Service will not grant relief when tax years that would have been affected by the election had it been timely made are closed by the statue of limitations before the taxpayer's receipt of a ruling granting relief under this section.
Announcement 99-57, 1999-24 I.R.B. 50 (June 14, 1999) provided that a taxpayer who timely filed his/her 1998 Federal Income Tax Return would have until October 15, 1999, to recharacterize an amount that had been converted from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA.
Announcement 99-104, 1999-44 I.R.B. 555 (November 1, 1999), provided that a taxpayer who timely filed his/her 1998 Federal Income Tax Return would have until December 31, 1999 to recharacterize an amount that had been converted from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA.
Taxpayers A and B timely filed their 1998 Federal Income Tax Return. As a result, they were eligible for relief under Announcement 99-57 or Announcement 99-104. However, they missed the deadlines found in said Announcements. Therefore, it is necessary to
determine if they are eligible for relief under the provisions of section 301.9100-3 of the regulations.
In this case, Taxpayers A and B were ineligible to convert IRAs U and W to Roth IRAs V and X, respectively, since their modified adjusted gross income exceeded $100,000. However, until they discovered otherwise Taxpayers A and B believed they were eligible to convert their traditional IRAs U and W to Roth IRAs. Accountant C discovered that Taxpayer A and B’s former accountant attempted to recharacterize the Roth IRAs V and X as traditional IRAs, but failed to properly notify and advise the taxpayers and their financial advisor. Taxpayers A and B filed this request for relief under section 301.9100 shortly after discovering that Company N had not recharacterized IRAs V and X as traditional IRAs, and before the Service discovered their ineligibility to convert their traditional IRAs U and W to Roth IRAs or their failure to recharacterize their Roth IRAs V and X as traditional IRAs pursuant to Announcements 99-57 or 99-104. The 1998 taxable year is not a closed tax year under the statute of limitations.
With respect to your request for relief, we believe that, based on the information submitted and the representations contained herein, the requirements of section 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the regulations have been met, and that you have acted reasonably and in good faith with respect to making the election to recharacterize your Roth IRAs V and X as traditional IRAs. Specifically, the Service has concluded that you have met the requirements of clauses (i) and (v) of section 301.9100-3(b)(1) of the regulations. Therefore, Taxpayers A and B are granted a period not to exceed six months from the date of this ruling letter to recharacterize Roth IRAs V and X back to traditional IRAs.
XXXXXXXXXXX Page - 5 - 200223069
No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may be applicable thereto.
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this ruling letter is being sent to your authorized representative.
If you have any questions concerning this ruling, please contact , T:EP:RA:T:2, at ,
Sincerely yours,
[illegible signature]
Joyce E. Floyd, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 2
Tax Exempt and Governmental Entities Division
Enclosures:
Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of intention to Disclose
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace