PLR 200223068: Terminating VEBA may transfer surplus assets to charity

Number
200223068
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
VEBA Surplus Transfer, Inurement, and Disqualified Benefits
Code sections
§ 170, § 501, § 509, § 511, § 512, § 4976, § 6110
Ruling dated
March 13, 2002
Publicly released
June 7, 2002

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2002
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A tax-exempt voluntary employees' beneficiary association (VEBA) ended its welfare benefit programs after paying outstanding claims. Its trustees proposed transferring remaining assets, including stock received from an insurer's demutualization, to a related charitable organization that was neither an employer nor a member of the VEBA. The IRS ruled that the transfer would not be a reversion to an employer subject to the 100% excise tax under IRC § 4976. It also ruled that the transfer would not jeopardize the VEBA's § 501(c)(9) exemption or generate unrelated business taxable income for the VEBA, trade association, or charity, including any gain from a prior sale of the stock.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: What are the excise tax, exemption, and unrelated business income effects of transferring a terminating VEBA's surplus to charity?
  • Outcome: Approved the requested treatment on all three issues.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 501(c)(9), 512(a)(3), 4976(b)(1)(C); Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(9)-4.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
200223068

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Date: MAR 13 2002
Uniform Issue List: 501.09-03
512.09-03
4976.01-00
T:EO:B2

LEGEND:
M =
N =
P =
Q =
R =
x =

Dear Sir or Madam:

We have considered your letter dated September 6, 2001, in which you requested certain rulings concerning the federal tax consequences of the proposed terminating distribution of M as further described below.

M is a group insurance trust that was formed pursuant to a Declaration of Trust and Agreement (the "Trust Agreement") between N, certain designated Trustees, and certain participating member employers ("Members"). N (subsequently renamed R) is a trade association exempt from federal income tax under section 501 (c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code"). The stated purpose of M was to provide certain group-insured welfare benefits to N and the Members.

The Trust Agreement was substantially amended to confirm M's compliance and operation as a voluntary employee beneficiary association ("VEBA"). The Service has determined that M is exempt from federal income tax under section 501(c)(9) of the Code.

In recent years the majority of M's operations involved the provision of medical insurance benefits through insured contracts issued by P. In 1999, P notified M of its desire to terminate the health insurance program provided by M. Because M could no longer viably provide group medical insurance benefits to participants, the Trustees and Members elected to terminate M's ongoing welfare benefit programs. All outstanding claims for benefits under M's benefit programs have since been paid, and M has ceased providing any medical insurance benefits or other welfare benefits.

  • 2 - 200223068

In 2000, as part of the demutualization of P, M, as a former policyholder, received 19x shares of common stock of the reorganized P (the "Demutualization Proceeds").

In connection with the process of terminating M, the Trustees resolved to dispose of the surplus assets remaining in M, including the Demutualization Proceeds (hereinafter collectively the "Surplus Assets") by transferring M's Surplus Assets to Q.

Q is exempt from federal income taxation under section 501(c)(3) of the Code and is not a private foundation within the meaning of section 509(a) because it is an organization described in section 509(a)(3). Q was organized to carry out the charitable and educational purposes of R and, in particular, to conduct educational activities and programs related to the industry in which R's Members are engaged. Q is not an employer of employees who are beneficiaries of M, has never made contributions to M, and does not maintain M.

To effectuate the Trustees' resolution, the Trust Agreement was amended to provide, in relevant part, that the Trustees shall distribute Surplus Assets to an organization or organizations exempt under section 501 (c)(3) of the Code, and in no event shall such surplus be paid to a Member of R.

The following rulings have been requested:

  1. The transfer of the Surplus Assets from M to Q will not be treated as a reversion under
    section 4976 of the Code, and, therefore, the transfer will not be subject to that section's 100% excise tax penalty and thereby will not result in the imposition of the 100% excise tax on M, R, any of the Members, or Q.

  2. The transfer of the Surplus Assets to Q will not jeopardize the tax-exempt status of M
    under section 501(c)(9) of the Code.

  3. The transfer of the Surplus Assets (including the gain, if any, on the sale of the
    Demutualization Proceeds prior to the transfer) to Q will not result in unrelated business taxable income to M, R, or Q.

Section 501(a) of the Code provides an exemption from federal income taxation for organizations described in section 501 (c).

Section 501(c)(9) of the Code describes a voluntary employees' beneficiary association ("VEBA") providing for the payment of life, sick, accident, or other benefits to its members or their dependents or designated beneficiaries, and in which no part of its net earnings inures (other than through such payments) to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual.

Section 1.501(c)(9)-4(a) of the Income Tax Regulations (the "regulations") provides that no part of the net earnings of an employee's association may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual other than through the payment of permissible benefits. Whether prohibited inurement has occurred is a question to be determined with regard to all the facts and

circumstances.

  • 3 - 200223068

Section 1.501(c)(9)-4(d) of the regulations provides that it will not constitute prohibited inurement if, on termination of a plan established by an employer and funded through an association described in section 501(c)(9), any assets remaining in the association, after the satisfaction of all liabilities to existing beneficiaries of the plan, are applied to provide, either directly or through the purchase of insurance, life, sick, accident, or other benefits within the meaning of section 1.501(c)(9)-3 pursuant to criteria that do not provide for disproportionate benefits to officers, shareholders, or highly compensated employees of the employer.

Section 4976(a) of the Code imposes an excise tax on an employer equal to 100 percent of any disqualified benefit provided by an employer-maintained welfare benefit fund.

Section 4976(b)(1)(C) of the Code defines “disqualified benefit” to include any portion of a welfare benefit fund reverting to the benefit of the employer.

Section 511 of the Code imposes a tax on the unrelated business taxable income of organizations described in section 501(c).

Section 512(a)(3)(A) of the Code provides that, in the case of an organization described in section 501(c)(9), the term "unrelated business taxable income" means the gross income (excluding any exempt function income) less the deductions allowed by Chapter 1 which are directly connected with the production of the gross income (excluding exempt function income), both computed with modifications.

Section 512(a)(3)(B)(i) of the Code provides that, in the case of an organization described in section 501(c)(9), the term "exempt function income" includes all income (other than an amount equal to the gross income derived from any unrelated trade or business regularly carried on by such organization computed as if the organization were subject to section 512(a)(1)) which is set aside for a purpose specified in section 170(c)(4).

Section 170(c)(4) of the Code provides that the term "charitable contribution" includes a contribution or gift by an individual to or for the use of a domestic fraternal lodge, order, or association, operating under the lodge system, but only if such contribution or gift is to be used exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, literary, or educational purposes, or for the prevention of cruelty to children or animals.

The information submitted establishes that the Trustees of M intend to terminate M and transfer the Surplus Assets to Q, an organization exempt under section 501(c)(3), to carry out Q's educational purposes. The Surplus Assets will not revert to R or to any Member of R. Therefore, the transfer of the Surplus Assets to Q will not result in prohibited inurement under section 501(c)(9), and will not, of itself, affect the tax exempt status of M under section 501(c)(9).

Q is not an employer with respect to N, nor is it an organization that otherwise is merely an

alter ego of a Member. It is a charitable organization, the assets of which are dedicated to charitable purposes and cannot be used for the private benefit of a Member. Therefore, the

  • 4 - 200223068

transfer of M's Surplus Assets to Q is not a reversion "to the benefit of the employer" as defined in section 4976(b)(1)(C) of the Code.

The provisions of section 512(a)(3)(B) of the Code indicate that the income of an organization exempt under section 501(c)(9) set aside for a purpose specified in section 170(c)(4) is exempt function income and, therefore, is excluded in computing such organization's unrelated business taxable income. Since the income generated by M's assets will be transferred to Q for purposes specified in section 170(c)(4), such income is considered exempt function income for purposes of section 512(a)(3), and is excluded from gross income in determining the unrelated business taxable income of M, R, or Q.

Accordingly, based on the information you have submitted, we conclude that:

  1. The transfer of the Surplus Assets from M to Q does not constitute a disqualified benefit
    under section 4976(b)(1)(C) of the Code and, therefore, the transfer will not result in the imposition of the excise tax under section 4976(a) on either, M, R, any of R's Members, or Q.

  2. The transfer of the Surplus Assets from M to Q will not affect M's tax-exempt status
    under section 501(c)(9) of the Code.

  3. The transfer of the Surplus Assets (including the gain, if any, on the sale of the
    Demutualization Proceeds prior to the transfer) from M to Q will not result in unrelated business taxable income to M, R, or Q.

Except as we have ruled above, we express no opinion as to the tax consequences of the transactions under the cited provisions of the Code or under any other provisions of the Code.

Because this ruling letter could help to resolve any questions, please keep it in your permanent records.

This ruling is directed only to the organization that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be cited as precedent.

Sincerely,

(signed) Terrell M. Berkovsky

Terrell M. Berkovsky
Manager, Exempt Organizations
Technical Group 2

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace