PLR 200223048: Research credit election allowed on amended return

Number
200223048
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Alternative Incremental Credit
Code sections
§ 41, § 6511, § 6110
Ruling dated
March 5, 2002
Publicly released
June 7, 2002

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2002
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer originally filed two returns without claiming a research credit because it believed no credit was available. It later determined that it could claim credits under the alternative incremental method and asked to amend the returns. The IRS ruled that the taxpayer could amend both returns within the time allowed by section 6511 and make the alternative incremental credit election on Form 6765 with the earlier amended return. The IRS did not determine whether the underlying expenditures qualified for the credit.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer elect the alternative incremental research credit on an amended return and amend a later return to claim the credit?
  • Outcome: Approved, within the section 6511 amendment period.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 41(a), 41(c)(4), 6511; Treas. Reg. § 1.41-1(a).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200223048
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 6/7/2002
Index Number: 41.01-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:07-PLR-143913-01
Date:
Re:
March 05, 2002

Legend:

Taxpayer:
x: y:

Dear
:

We received letters from Taxpayer’s authorized representative requesting a ruling that Taxpayer may amend its federal income tax returns for the x and y taxable years to claim the credit for increasing research activities under § 41 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) and elect the alternative incremental credit for increasing research activities (AIC) under § 41(c)(4) for the x taxable year. This letter responds to that request.

FACTS:

The represented facts are as follows. Taxpayer is a calendar year taxpayer. Prior to taxable year x, Taxpayer calculated its credit for increasing research activities using the general rule under § 41(a). At the time Taxpayer filed its x and y tax returns, Taxpayer determined that it was not entitled to any credit for increasing research activities under either the general rule or the AIC. Accordingly, Taxpayer did not include a Form 6765, “Credit for Increasing Research Activities”, with its x and y tax returns. Subsequent to filing its x and y tax returns, Taxpayer determined that it was entitled to credits for increasing research activities under the AIC for taxable years x and y.

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

Section 41(c)(4)(A) provides that for taxable years beginning after June 30, 1996, a taxpayer may elect to determine its research credit under the AIC. Section 1.41-1(a), Income Tax Regulations. Section 41(c)(4)(B) provides that an election under
§ 41(c)(4)(A) shall apply for the taxable year in which made and all succeeding taxable years unless revoked with the consent of the Secretary.

CONCLUSION:

2

Given the particular facts and circumstances of this case, Taxpayer may amend its x and y tax returns within the time permitted by § 6511 of the Code and may include within its x amended tax return an election to use the AIC on Form 6765.

Except as expressly provided herein, we express or imply no opinion concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. Further, we express or imply no opinion concerning expenditures Taxpayer treated as qualified research expenses.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative. A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

Sincerely,
Leslie H. Finlow
Chief, Branch 7
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace