PLR 200220027: Amendment limits earlier ruling on LLC partnership status
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS amended an earlier private letter ruling to state that an LLC represented itself as classified as a partnership under Treas. Reg. § 301.7701-3. The amendment also added a limitation: the IRS expressed no opinion on whether the LLC actually was a partnership or whether the ruling recipient was a partner. All other parts of the earlier ruling remained the same. This letter supplies only those changes to the earlier ruling.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: What does the amendment change about the earlier ruling's discussion of the LLC?
- Outcome: other, amendment clarifying a representation and reserving the partnership classification questions
- Key authorities: Treas. Reg. § 301.7701-3
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 200220027
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
Date: September 24, 2001 Contact Person:
ID No.
UIL: 9999.98-00 Telephone Number:
T:EO:B1
Employer Identification Number:
Dear Sir/Madam:
This letter modifies private letter ruling number 200041038 dated July 20, 2000.
The first sentence in the first paragraph under the heading “Rationale” should be deleted and the following sentence should be substituted in its place:
LLC has represented that it is classified as a partnership for federal tax purposes under section 301.7701-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations.
In addition, under the heading “Rulings,” the following sentence should be added to the second paragraph following the three numbered rulings:
In particular, no opinion is expressed regarding (i) whether the LLC is classified as a partnership for federal tax purposes, or (ii) if LLC is classified as a partnership, whether you are a partner in the partnership. In all other respects, private letter ruling number 200041038 remains the same. In accordance with the Power of Attorney currently on file with the Internal Revenue Service, we are sending a copy of this letter to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
(signed) Marvin Friedlander
Marvin Friedlander
Manager, Exempt Organizations
Technical Group 1
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace