PLR 200218021: Supplemental ruling preserves prior corporate distribution rulings
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A corporate group requested a supplemental ruling after an earlier distribution of a controlled corporation. The group planned an equity infusion and an acquisition in which a foreign seller would transfer assets to a newly formed corporation for stock and notes. Based solely on the submitted information and representations, the IRS ruled that these later transactions would not adversely affect the prior rulings. The letter expressly declined to rule on the tax effects of the asset transfer itself or on matters outside the prior and supplemental rulings.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Will the proposed equity infusion and acquisition adversely affect the prior rulings on the corporate distribution?
- Outcome: Approved: the prior rulings remain in full force and effect on the stated facts.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 355 and 368; 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3).
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Number: 200218021
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 5/3/2002
Index Numbers: 0355.01-00, 0368.04-00
Person to Contact:
Telephone Number:
Refer Reply To:
CC:CORP:4 PLR-147187-01
Date:
January 30, 2002
Date A
=
Foreign Seller
=
Target Business
=
g
=
Dear
This letter responds to your August 24, 2001 request that we supplement our letter ruling dated December 16, 1998 (PLR-116429-98)(the “Original Letter Ruling”). An earlier supplemental letter ruling (PLR-105017-99)(the First Supplemental Letter Ruling”) was issued on June 16, 1999. The Original Letter Ruling and the First Supplemental Letter Ruling are together referred to herein as the “Prior Letter Rulings.” Capitalized terms not defined in this ruling retain the meanings assigned in the Prior Letter Rulings.
The Prior Letter Rulings address certain federal income tax consequences of a proposed distribution by Distributing 2 to its shareholders of Controlled 2 (“Distribution 2") and related transactions. Distribution 2 was completed on Date A. Subsequently, Distributing 1 began negotiations with Foreign Seller to acquire, and eventually agreed to acquire, the domestic and foreign operations of the Target Business (the “Target Acquisition Transaction”). As part of the Target Acquisition Transaction, (i) Controlled 2 will transfer all of the Distributing 1 stock to a newly formed corporation (“Newco”), (ii) Controlled 2 will issue additional equity (the “Equity Infusion”), and (iii) Foreign Seller will transfer to Newco Target Business assets in exchange for Newco stock and notes. Following the transfer, Foreign Seller will own g percent of Newco.
In connection with this supplemental ruling request, each of Distributing 2 and Controlled 2 makes the following representations:
PLR-147187-01
(a) After Distribution 2, there has been a change in business conditions that has resulted in the Equity Infusion and the Target Acquisition Transaction.
(b) At the time of Distribution 2, the Equity Infusion and the Target Acquisition Transaction were not anticipated by Controlled 2 and Distributing 2.
(c) At the time of Distribution 2, none of Distributing 2, Controlled 2, or their officers or directors had participated in any understanding, arrangement, agreement, or negotiation with Foreign Seller as to the Target Acquisition Transaction.
(d) At the time of Distribution 2, none of the Distributing 2 shareholders had participated in any understanding, arrangement, or negotiation with Foreign Seller as to the Target Acquisition Transaction.
Based solely on the information and representations submitted with the supplemental ruling request (including subsequent correspondence), we rule as follows:
The Equity Infusion and the Target Acquisition Transaction will have no adverse effect on the rulings contained in the Prior Letter Rulings, which will remain in full force and effect.
We express no opinion on the tax effects of the transaction under other provisions of the Code and regulations, or the tax effects of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the transaction that are not specifically covered by the Prior Letter Rulings and this supplemental ruling. In particular, no ruling was requested and no opinion is expressed regarding the transfer by Foreign Seller of Target Business assets in exchange for Newco stock and notes.
This supplemental ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Each taxpayer involved in the transaction should attach a copy of this supplemental letter to the taxpayer’s federal income tax return for th taxable year in which the transaction is consummated.
Under a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to the taxpayer and an additional representative.
Sincerely,
Sean P. Duffley
Assistant to the Chief, Branch 4
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Corporate)
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace