PLR 200217039: Financing changes preserve exception for identified short sales

Number
200217039
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Constructive Sales of Appreciated Financial Positions
Code sections
§ 1259, § 1233
Ruling dated
January 24, 2002
Publicly released
April 26, 2002

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2002
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A trust held stock while also maintaining short sales of the same stock. It had identified the stock and short sales as offsetting positions under the transition exception to IRC § 1259 in the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997. Its broker proposed changing the interest charged on margin borrowing and the fee retained from securities lending rebates. The IRS ruled that those financing changes would not end the exception or make the positions count toward a constructive sale. The trust still held the stock and had not delivered shares to close the short sales, which were key facts for the ruling.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Do changes to margin interest and a broker's rebate fee end the statutory exception for the identified short sales?
  • Outcome: Approved: the short sales continue to qualify for the exception under the represented facts.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1259; Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 § 1001(d)(2); Treas. Reg. § 1.1233-1(a).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200217039
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 4/26/2002
Index Number: 1259.00-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:
(202) 622-3920
Refer Reply To:
CC:FIP: /PLR-144619-01
Date:
January 24, 2002

LEGEND

Taxpayer
=
Trustee
=
Broker
=
Stock
=
State A
=
Date 1
=
Date 2
=
X
=
Y
=
Date 3
=
Z
=
Amount 1
=
Amount 2
=

Dear :

This is in reply to a letter dated August 17, 2001, and subsequent correspondence, submitted by your authorized representative, requesting a ruling that certain identified short sales with respect to Stock will continue to fall within the exception to section 1259 of the Internal Revenue Code provided in section 1001(d)(2) of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 (Public Law 105-34).

FACTS

Trustee is a banking corporation chartered under the laws of State A that engages in the banking, trust, and related financial services businesses. In its capacity as trustee, Trustee manages the assets of Taxpayer on behalf of Taxpayer’s beneficiaries. As part of its fiduciary duty, Trustee has sought to protect Taxpayer’s assets by, among other things, diversifying Taxpayer’s investments. In order to help achieve diversification, Trustee executed short against the box transactions with respect to Stock held by Taxpayer.

Between Date 1 and Date 2, Trustee caused Taxpayer to execute X separate short sales in respect of Y shares of Stock (the Short Sales). Due to a split of Stock on Date 3, the aggregate number of shorted shares is Z. These transactions were short against the box transactions because Taxpayer also owned Y shares of Stock at the
PLR-144619-01
2

time it entered into the Short Sales. Taxpayer represents that before the close of the 30-day period beginning on August 5, 1997, it clearly identified the Y shares of Stock and the Short Sales in its books and records as offsetting positions. Taxpayer continues to hold the Y shares of Stock and has not delivered shares to close the Short Sales.

In order to effect the Short Sales, Taxpayer established a securities trading account (Margin Account) with Broker so that Taxpayer could execute purchases and sales of securities through Broker and borrow cash on margin from the Broker. Broker charges interest in respect of any borrowing in the Margin Account.

Broker, acting at the direction and on behalf of Taxpayer, entered into a series of securities lending agreements with third parties (the Lenders) for the total Y shares of Stock. Cash collateral in an amount equal to the current fair market value of the borrowed shares had to be posted with the Lenders. On behalf of Taxpayer, Broker posted the required cash collateral with the Lenders. Broker received the Lender’s Rebate on the collateral posted and then credited Taxpayer with the Rebate less an amount retained by Broker as a fee. (Taxpayer was also required to post with Broker the same number of shares as were sold short.)

After the shares were transferred from the securities lender to Broker, Broker sold the shares in the capital markets and deposited the short sale proceeds in the Margin Account. If at any time the Lenders require more collateral, Broker must post the collateral on behalf of Taxpayer. If, at the time the collateral is posted, the amount of required collateral is more than the cash in the Margin Account, the difference is deemed a loan from Broker to Taxpayer. As noted above, Broker charges interest on such loans.

Broker proposes to change the interest rate on the Margin Account borrowings as well as the fee Broker retains from the Lender’s Rebate. Broker has proposed to fix the interest charged on margin borrowings at the federal funds rate less Amount 1 basis points and to pass along the Lender’s Rebate based on the federal funds rate less Amount 2 basis points.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1001(d)(2) of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 (the effective date provision) provides an exception to section 1259 for sales of positions, etc. held before June 9, 1997 if, before June 9, 1997, the taxpayer entered into any transaction which is a constructive sale of any appreciated financial position, and before the close of the 30- day period beginning on August 5, 1997 such transaction and position are clearly identified in the taxpayer’s records as offsetting. The exception ceases to apply as of the date such transaction is closed or the taxpayer ceases to hold the position. The legislative history of section 1259 explains that the effective date provision prevents any identified transaction or position from being taken into account in determining whether a
PLR-144619-01
3

constructive sale after June 8, 1997 has occurred. S. REP. NO. 949, 105th Cong., 1st Sess. 122 (1997), H. R. REP. NO. 2014, 105th Cong., 1st Sess. 438 (1997).

Section 1.1233-1(a) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that a short sale is not deemed to be consummated until delivery of property to close the short sale.

Taxpayer represents that it identified both the Y shares of Stock and the Short Sales as offsetting positions as of the date indicated in the effective date provision. At this time, Taxpayer still holds the Y shares of Stock and has not delivered shares to close the Short Sales.

Because Taxpayer has not closed the Short Sales and continues to hold the Y shares of Stock, the Short Sales and the Y shares of Stock still fall within the effective date provision of section 1259. The changes to the interest rate charged on the Margin Account and the fee retained by the Broker will not cause either the Y shares of Stock or the Short Sales to be taken into account in determining whether a constructive sale has occurred under section 1259.

CONCLUSION

Based on the facts submitted and representations made by Taxpayer, the Short Sales will continue to fall within the exception to section 1259 provided in section 1001(d)(2) of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997.

Except as specifically ruled upon, no opinion is expressed as to the federal tax treatment of the above transaction.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to Taxpayer’s authorized representative.

Sincerely yours,
PATRICK E. WHITE
Assistant to the Chief, Branch 1
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Financial Institutions & Products)
Enclosures:

Copy of this letter
Section 6110 Copy

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace