PLR 200217030: Parent receives more time to make a qualified subchapter S subsidiary election
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A company acquired all of the stock of an S corporation and intended to treat the acquired corporation as a qualified subchapter S subsidiary. The company did not timely file the required QSub election because its legal and tax advisers did not tell it that an election was required. The IRS concluded that the requirements for relief under Treasury Regulations §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 were satisfied. It granted the company 60 days to make the election effective on the specified date, subject to filing consistent amended returns. The ruling did not decide whether the company was a valid S corporation or whether the subsidiary was a valid QSub.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the company receive additional time to elect QSub treatment for its wholly owned subsidiary?
- Outcome: Approved: the company receives a 60-day extension to make the QSub election, subject to the stated conditions.
- Key authorities: IRC § 1361(b)(3); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1361-3(a)(6) and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Number: 200217030
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 4/26/2002
Index Numbers: 1362.01-03; 9100.00-00 Person to Contact:
Telephone Number:
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:3 PLR-154793-01
Date:
January 22, 2002
Legend
Company
=
Subsidiary =
State
=
a
=
b
=
Dear
This letter responds to a letter dated September 28, 2001, and subsequent correspondence, requesting on behalf of Company an extension of time pursuant to §§ 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations for Company to elect to treat Subsidiary as a qualified subchapter S subsidiary under § 1361(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
FACTS
According to the information submitted, Company was incorporated on a under the laws of State. On b, Company purchased all of the outstanding stock of Subsidiary, an S corporation. Thus, Subsidiary became a wholly owned subsidiary of Company. Company represents that it intended to continue treating Subsidiary as an S corporation. However, Company failed to timely file the proper election to be a qualified subchapter S subsidiary (“QSub”).
Company also represents that, except for the election, Subsidiary meets all of the requirements of a QSub under § 1361(b)(3)(B). Company further represents that it relied solely on the tax advice of its attorneys serving as legal counsel and tax advisor for the acquisition, who did not advise Company of the required QSub election. Finally, Company represents that it was not aware that a QSub election was required.
LAW & ANALYSIS
Section 1361(b)(3)(B) defines the term "qualified subchapter S subsidiary" (QSub) as a domestic corporation that is not an ineligible corporation, if 100 percent of the stock of the corporation is held by an S corporation, and the S corporation elects to treat the corporation as a QSub. The statutory provision does not, however, provide guidance on the manner in which the QSub election is made or the effective date of the election.
A taxpayer makes a QSub election for a subsidiary by filing Form 8869, Qualified Subchapter S Subsidiary Election, with the appropriate Service Center. The election may be effective on the date the Form 8869 is filed or up to two months and 15 days prior to the filing of the form, provided that date is not before the parent’s first taxable year beginning after December 31, 1996, and that the subsidiary otherwise qualifies as a QSub for the entire period for which the retroactive relief is in effect. If a valid QSub election is made, the subsidiary is not treated as a separate corporation, and all assets, liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit of the QSub are treated as assets, liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit of the parent S corporation.
Section 1.1361-3(a)(6) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that an extension of time to make a QSub election may be available under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100- 3.
Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term "regulatory election" as including an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-1(a).
Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.
Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Section 301.9100-3(a).
CONCLUSION
Based on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Consequently, Company is granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this letter to make an election to treat Subsidiary as a QSub effective b. A copy of this letter should be attached to the Form 8869 filed with the Service Center. A copy is enclosed for that purpose. This ruling is contingent on Company filing amended income tax returns for itself and Subsidiary consistent with the treatment of Subsidiary as a QSub for the period beginning b.
Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning whether Company is a valid S corporation or whether Subsidiary is a valid QSub for federal tax purposes.
Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to Company’s authorized representative.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Sincerely Yours,
Paul F. Kugler
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes
cc:
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace