PLR 200216034: Transfer between municipal retirement accounts would harm plan qualification

Number
200216034
Outcome
Denied
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Qualified Pension, Profit-Sharing, and Stock Bonus Plan
Code sections
§ 401, § 412, § 414, § 501
Ruling dated
January 24, 2002
Publicly released
April 19, 2002

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2002
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A state retirement system asked whether it could move assets from an overfunded municipal account to two accounts with unfunded liabilities. The IRS found that each account was a separate plan because its assets could pay benefits only for employees covered by that account, even though the system pooled investments. Moving assets from the overfunded account to the others would violate the exclusive benefit requirement of IRC § 401(a)(2). The IRS ruled that the transfer would adversely affect that account's qualified status and the system's tax exemption under § 501(a).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can the retirement system transfer surplus assets from one municipality account to two others without affecting tax qualification?
  • Outcome: Denied; the transfer would harm the source account's qualification and the system's tax exemption
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 401(a)(2), 501(a); Treas. Reg. § 1.414(l)-1(b)(1); Rev. Ruls. 81-100, 81-137

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index No. 401.00-00

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
200216034
TAX EXEMPT AND

GOVERNMENT ENTITIES

Date: JAN 24 2002

DIVISION

T:EP:RA:T:A1

In Re:

State A =

Municipal System =

City of B =

Certain Municipal System Accounts:
C Account =
D Account =
E Account =

This is in response to the request from your representative for a ruling that transfers of assets from the C Account to the D and E Accounts will not affect the qualified status of the Municipal System.

State A has established a retirement board (the “Retirement Board”) to manage certain retirement systems for government employees. One of the State A retirement systems is the Municipal System. The Municipal System is a contributory plan, intended to qualify under section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Municipal System is maintained by State A and 63 municipalities, housing authorities and water and sewer districts (collectively, the "Municipalities") within State A. The Municipal System is a governmental plan within the meaning of section 414(d).

All assets of the Municipal System are held within accounts ("Municipality Accounts") maintained for the Municipalities. A particular Municipality may have one or more Municipality Accounts. Assets may be transferred from one Municipality Account to another Municipality Account under the laws of State A only upon receipt of a favorable private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service. All assets within the individual Municipality Accounts are pooled together for investment purposes.

200216034

2

Each Municipality Account has three separate reserves: a Members’ Contribution Reserve, an Employer's Accumulation Reserve, and a Retirement Reserve. For each Municipality Account, employee contributions are credited to individual sub-accounts within that account’s Members’ Contribution Reserve and Municipality contributions are credited to that account's Employer's Accumulation Reserve.

All retirement benefits from a Municipality Account are paid from the Retirement Reserve of that Municipality Account. Amounts are credited to the Retirement Reserve upon the granting of a retirement allowance to an employee, at which time the accumulated value of that employee's Members' Contribution Reserve sub-account is transferred to the Retirement Reserve along with a transfer from the Employer's Accumulation Reserve of that Municipality Account of an amount equal to the excess of the actuarial value of the retirement allowance less the value of the employee's Members' Contribution Reserve sub-account. Thus, the assets of any particular Municipality Account are, in effect, only available to pay the benefits of employees covered under that Municipality Account.

All income from investments, on any of the three reserves within a Municipality Account, including gains and losses from investment transactions are credited (or charged) to that Municipality Account’s Retirement Reserve. Annually, the value of the assets of the Retirement Reserve within a Municipality Account is compared to the actuarial liabilities of that Retirement Reserve. If the value of the assets exceeds the actuarial liabilities, the excess is transferred from the Retirement Reserve of that Municipality Account to the Employer's Accumulation Reserve of that Municipality Account. If the value of the actuarial liabilities exceeds the assets, an amount equal to the deficiency is transferred from the Employer's Accumulation Reserve of that Municipality Account to the Retirement Reserve of that Municipality Account.

Three accounts are maintained for the City of B within the Municipal System: the C Account, the D Account, and the E Account. The C Account is overfunded. The D and E Accounts have unfunded liabilities.

Law

Section 401(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) provides that a trust created or organized in the United States and forming part of a stock bonus, pension, or profit-sharing plan of an employer for the exclusive benefit of his employees or their beneficiaries shall constitute a qualified trust under this section if under the trust instrument it is impossible, at any time, prior to the satisfaction of all liabilities with respect to employees and their beneficiaries under the trust, for any part of the corpus or income to be (within the taxable year or thereafter) used for, or diverted to, purposes other than for the exclusive benefit of his employees or their beneficiaries.

3

200216034

Section 1.414(l)-1(b)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that a plan is a "single plan” if and only if, on an ongoing basis, all of the plan assets are available to pay benefits to employees who are covered by the plan and their beneficiaries. Furthermore, that section provides that more than one plan will exist if a portion of the plan assets is not available to pay some of the of the benefits. This will be so even if each plan has the same benefit structure or plan document, or if all or part of the assets are invested with separate accounting with respect to each plan.

Revenue Ruling 81-100, 1981-1 C.B. 326 provides, in part, that a group trust, formed by the pooling the assets of individual trusts, is exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of the Code with respect to its funds which equitably belong to participating trusts described in section 401(a) only if the group trust instrument expressly limits participation to employer's pension trusts which are exempt under section 501 (a) of the Code by qualifying under section 401(a).

Revenue Ruling 81-137, 1981-1 C.B. 232 provides that if the assets of a subdivision of a trust are only available to provides benefits for employees of that subdivision, each subdivision constitutes a single plan, and furthermore the minimum funding standards of section 412 of the Code and section 302 of ERISA are separately determined for each of the single plans.

Analysis

The total assets of the Municipal System consist of the sum of the assets within each of the Municipal Accounts within the Municipal System. Under the laws of State A, the assets of any particular Municipal Account are only available to pay the benefits of the employees covered under that Municipal Account. Thus, because all of the assets of the Municipal System are not available to pay benefits for all covered employees the Municipal System is not a single plan. Moreover, because the assets of any particular Municipal Account are only available to pay the benefits for that Municipal Account, each Municipal Account constitutes a single plan. Therefore the C, D, and E Accounts each constitute a separate plan.

Because the C, D, and E Accounts are separate plans, in order to satisfy section 401(a)(2) of the Code no part of the corpus or income of any one of these Municipality Accounts may be used for purposes other than for the exclusive benefit of the employees or their beneficiaries whose retirement benefits are provided through that Municipality Account. The proposed transfer of assets from the C Account to the D or E Account would be a use of such assets for purposes other than for the exclusive benefit

of the employees or beneficiaries whose retirement benefits are provided through the C Account.

4

200216034

Furthermore, because the assets of the individual Municipality Accounts within the Municipal System are pooled together for investment purposes, the Municipal System is, in effect, a group trust within the meaning of Rev. Rule 81-100. Thus, the Municipal System is exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of the Code only if all of the Municipality Accounts qualify under section 401 (a).

Therefore we hold that:
The transfer of assets from the C Account to the D or the E Account would not satisfy the requirements of section 401(a) of the Code and therefore would adversely affect the qualified status of the C account under section 401 and the tax exempt status of the Municipal System under section 501 (a).

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

A copy of this letter is being furnished to your authorized representative pursuant to a power of attorney (Form 2848) on file.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact (not a toll free number).

Sincerely,

James E. Holland, Jr., Acting Manager

Employee Plans Technical

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace