PLR 200214022: Former resident's expatriation lacked a principal tax avoidance purpose

Plain-English summary

A former U.S. long-term resident surrendered his green card and asked whether tax avoidance was a principal reason. His net worth exceeded the threshold that ordinarily creates a presumption of tax avoidance under IRC § 877. The IRS found his request complete and made in good faith, so the presumption did not apply. It also concluded that the submitted information clearly established the absence of a principal purpose to avoid U.S. income, estate, or gift taxes. The ruling did not determine his tax liability for other years or under other Code provisions.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Did surrendering the green card have a principal purpose of avoiding U.S. taxes?
• Outcome: Approved; the presumption was rebutted and the IRS found no principal tax avoidance purpose on the submitted facts.
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 877, 2107, and 2501(a)(3); Notice 98-34.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200214022
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 4/5/2002
Index Number: 877.01-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:Br1-PLR-164375-01
Date:
January 3, 2002

TY:

A
=

Country B
=

Date C
=

Year 1
=

Country D
=

Date E
=

Dear:

This is in response to a letter from your authorized representative dated October 24, 2000, requesting a ruling that A’s surrender of his U.S. Alien Registration Card (Green Card) did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes under subtitle A or subtitle B of the Code. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

A was born in Country B on Date C. In Year 1, A obtained a Green Card. A now resides in Country D. A surrendered his Green Card on Date E. A will be subject to Country D tax on his worldwide income. On the date of A’s expatriation, his net worth exceeded the applicable amount set forth in section 877(a)(2). 2 PLR-164375-01

Section 877 generally provides that a citizen who loses U.S. citizenship or a U.S. long-term resident who ceases to be taxed as a lawful permanent resident (individuals who "expatriate") within the 10-year period immediately preceding the close of the taxable year will be subject to the special rules of section 877(d) for such taxable year, unless such loss did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. Sections 2107 and 2501(a)(3) provide special estate and gift tax regimes, respectively, for individuals who expatriate with a principal purpose to avoid U.S. taxes.

A former U.S. citizen or former U.S. long-term resident will be treated as having expatriated with a principal purpose to avoid U.S. taxes for purposes of sections 877, 2107 and 2501(a)(3) if the individual’s average income tax liability or the individual’s net worth on the date of expatriation exceed certain thresholds. See sections 877(a)(2), 2107(a)(2)(A) and 2501(a)(3)(B).

A former U.S. citizen whose net worth or average tax liability exceeds these thresholds, however, will not be presumed to have a principal purpose of tax avoidance if that former citizen is described within certain statutory categories and submits a request for a ruling within one year of the date of loss of U.S. citizenship for the Secretary’s determination as to whether such loss had for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. See sections 877(c)(1), 2107(a)(2)(B), and 2501(a)(3)(C).

Under Notice 98-34, 1998-2 C.B. 29, modifying Notice 97-19, 1997-1 C.B. 394, a former long-term resident whose net worth or average tax liability exceeds the applicable thresholds will not be presumed to have a principal purpose of tax avoidance if that former resident is described within certain categories and submits a complete and good faith request for a ruling as to whether such loss had for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes.

Notice 98-34, requires that certain information be submitted with a request for a ruling that an individual’s expatriation did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes.

A narrowly fails to satisfy the criteria of section IV of Notice 97-19 because A spent 45 days in the United States during one year of the 10-year period prior to expatriation. Therefore, A is eligible to submit a ruling request.

A submitted all of the information required to be submitted by Notice 97-19, as modified by Notice 98-34, including additional information requested by the Service after review of the submission.

Accordingly, based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that A has made a complete and good faith submission in accordance with section 877(c)(1)(B) and Notice 98-34. Therefore, A will not be presumed under section 877(a)(2) to have had as one of his principal purposes for expatriating the avoidance of 3 PLR-164375-01

U.S. taxes. We further conclude that A will not be treated under section 877(a)(2) as having had as one of his principal purposes for expatriating the avoidance of U.S. taxes because the information submitted clearly establishes the lack of a principal purpose to avoid taxes under subtitle A or B of the Code.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. In addition, no opinion is expressed as to A’s U.S. tax liability for the taxable years prior to or after his expatriation under sections of the Code other than sections 877, 2107, and 2501(a)(3).

A copy of this letter must be attached to A’s U.S. income tax return for the year in which A obtained the ruling (whether or not A is otherwise required to file a return).

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to one of A’s authorized representatives and to A.

Sincerely,
Senior Technical Reviewer
CC:INTL:Br1