PLR 200213029: Switching future pension accruals to plan contributions is not a cash election

Number
200213029
Outcome
Mixed outcome
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Qualified Pension, Profit-Sharing, and Stock Bonus Plan
Code sections
§ 401
Ruling dated
December 31, 2001
Publicly released
March 29, 2002

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2002
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An employer planned to let employees stop earning future benefits in its defined benefit plan and instead receive enhanced employer contributions to its defined contribution plan. Existing accrued benefits would remain in the first plan, and employees would have no option to receive cash or another taxable benefit. The IRS ruled that this choice was not a cash or deferred election under IRC § 401(k). It declined to answer a second request about the plans' partial qualification because its published procedure bars such rulings. The favorable ruling assumed that both plans remained qualified under § 401(a).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Would the choice between future pension accruals and employer contributions be a cash or deferred election?
  • Outcome: Mixed; the IRS ruled no on the election question and declined to address the second request.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 401(a), 401(k); Treas. Reg. § 1.401(k)-1(a)(3); Rev. Proc. 2001-4.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

200213029

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

DEC 31 2001

UIL: 401.00-00

Legend:
Taxpayer =
Plan X =
Plan Y =

State A =

This is in response to a request for a private letter ruling dated July 26, 2001, submitted on your behalf by your authorized representative. The request concerns whether a proposed election offered to employees participating in Plan X and Plan Y constitutes a cash or deferred election under section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Taxpayer is a State A corporation that has established Plan X, a defined benefit plan, and Plan Y, a defined contribution plan, for the benefit of its employees. Plan X and Plan Y have both been issued favorable determination letters as to their qualification under Code section 401(a) from the appropriate Area Office of the Internal Revenue Service on March 19, 2001 and November 15, 2000, respectively. All participants in Plan X are also eligible to participate in Plan Y.

The Taxpayer proposes to amend Plan X and Plan Y to offer all participants in Plan X a one time irrevocable election to cease future participation in Plan X effective December 30, 2001, and thereafter receive an enhanced contribution to Plan Y known as the "Employer Regular Contribution". The Employer Regular Contribution would be made by the Taxpayer to Plan Y in the amount of 1, 2, 3 or 4 percent of the participant's annual compensation depending on his number of years of credited service. Participants who make this election (“transferring participants”) will cease to accrue benefits under Plan X after December 30, 2001. Participants in Plan X who do not make this election will continue to participate in Plan X in accordance with its terms.

Page 2 200213029

No distributions will be made to the transferring participants as a result of the transfer. The Plan X benefits accrued through December 30, 2001, by the transferring participants will be held, administered and distributed in accordance with the terms of Plan X. Plan X will be further amended to provide that effective December 30, 2001, any employee hired by the Taxpayer will not have the option of participating in Plan X. The obligations to the transferring participant under Plan X will be those that have accrued through December 30, 2001, and the obligations to the transferring participant under Plan Y are enhanced only to the extent of the Employer Regular Contribution commencing after December 30, 2001 and continuing thereafter.

The only additional benefit a transferring participant will receive is the Employer Regular Contribution to Plan Y. The Taxpayer is not providing any additional compensation for the transfer (either now or in the future) in the form of cash or some other taxable benefit. The Taxpayer has neither incurred nor will incur any obligations to transferring participants apart from those under Plan X and Plan Y as a result of the transfer.

Section 8.04 of Revenue Procedure 2001-4, 2001-1 I.R.B.121, states that the Service will not issue a letter ruling on the partial determination of an employee plan. Accordingly, we are unable to respond to your second ruling request.

Based on the above facts, the following ruling requested:

The election of any transferring participant to cease to accrue benefits in Plan X effective December 30, 2001 and thereafter and to become eligible to receive the Employer Regular Contribution as described in Plan Y will not be a cash or deferred election as described in section 401(k) of the Code and the regulations thereunder.

Section 1.401(k)-1(a)(3) of the Income Tax Regulations states that a cash or deferred election is any election (or modification of an earlier election) by an employee to have the employer either provide an amount to the employee in the form of cash or some other taxable benefit that is not currently available, or contribute an amount to a trust or provide an accrual or benefit under a plan deferring the receipt of compensation.

The election here for the Plan X participant is between continuing benefit accruals under Plan X or having additional amounts contributed to Plan Y on his behalf. There is no option to receive cash or some other taxable benefit that is not currently available.

Accordingly, we conclude that the election of any transferring participant to cease to accrue benefits in Plan X effective December 30, 2001 and thereafter and to become eligible to receive the Employer Regular Contribution as described in Plan Y will not be a cash or deferred election as described in section 401(k) of the Code and the regulations thereunder

This ruling is based on the assumption that Plan X and Plan Y remain qualified under Code section 401(a) at all times relevant to this ruling request. We are expressing no opinion on whether the language of the proposed Plan X and Plan Y plan amendments will affect the qualified Status of those plans. A determination as to the continued qualified status of Plan X and Plan Y as amendment is within the jurisdiction of the appropriate Internal Revenue Service Area Office.

This ruling is directed solely to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent

Page 3 200213029

The original of this ruling is being sent to your authorized representative in accordance with a power of attorney on file in this office.

The author of this letter is (ID# ) who may be reached at( ) -

Sincerely yours,

Frances V. Sloan, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 3

Tax Exempt and Government
Entities Division

Enclosures:
Deleted copy
Form 437

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace