PLR 200211033: Former resident's departure was not principally for tax avoidance

Plain-English summary

A former long term U.S. resident gave up lawful permanent resident status and became fully subject to income tax in the country of his birth. His net worth exceeded the statutory threshold that could trigger a tax avoidance presumption under the expatriation rules then in effect. He sought a ruling within a year and supplied the information required by Notice 98-34. The IRS concluded that his submission was complete and made in good faith, so he would not be presumed or treated as having a principal tax avoidance purpose under section 877(a)(2). The ruling did not decide other U.S. tax liabilities before or after his departure.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Did the former resident's loss of U.S. permanent resident status have a principal purpose of avoiding U.S. taxes?
• Outcome: Approved: no such purpose was found under the cited expatriation provisions on the submitted facts.
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 877, 2107, 2501(a)(3); Notice 98-34.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200211033
Release Date: 3/15/2002
Washington, DC 20224
Index No.: 877.01-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number

Refer Reply to:
PLR-163742-01/CC:INTL:B01
Date:
December 17, 2001

A
=

Date B =

Date C =

Country D =

Dear
:

This is in response to a letter of Date B, by A’s authorized representative requesting a ruling under section 877(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 ("Code") that A’s loss of long-term resident status did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes under subtitle A or subtitle B of the Code.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by penalty of perjury statements executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

A, a long-term resident of the United States within the meaning of section 877(e), relinquished his U.S. lawful permanent resident status ("expatriated") on Date C. A is a citizen of Country D, the country in which he was born. On the date of A’s expatriation, his net worth exceeded the threshold amount stated in section 877(a)(2).

Section 877 generally provides that a citizen who loses U.S. citizenship or a U.S. long-term resident who ceases to be taxed as a lawful permanent resident (individuals who "expatriate") within the 10-year period immediately preceding the close of the taxable year will be taxed under section 877(b) and the special rules of section 877(d) for such taxable year, unless such loss did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. Sections 2107 and 2501(a)(3) provide special estate and gift tax regimes, respectively, for individuals who expatriate with a principal purpose to avoid U.S. taxes.

PLR-163742-01
Page 2

A former citizen or former long term-resident will be treated as having expatriated with a principal purpose to avoid U.S. taxes for purposes of sections 877, 2107 and 2501(a)(3) if the individual’s average income tax liability or the individual’s net worth on the date of expatriation exceed certain thresholds. See sections 877(a)(2), 2107(a)(2)(A) and 2501(a)(3)(B).

A former U.S. citizen or former long term-resident whose net worth or average tax liability exceeds these thresholds, however, will not be presumed to have a principal purpose of tax avoidance if that former citizen is described within certain statutory categories and submits a request for a ruling within one year of the date of loss of U.S. citizenship for the Secretary’s determination as to whether such loss had for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. See sections 877(c), 2107(a)(2)(B) and 2501(a)(3)(C).

Under Notice 98-34, 1998-2 C.B. 29, modifying Notice 97-19, 1997-1 C.B. 394, a former long-term resident whose net worth or average tax liability exceeds the applicable thresholds will not be presumed to have a principal purpose of tax avoidance if that former resident is described within certain categories and submits a complete and good faith request for a ruling as to whether such loss had for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes.

Notice 98-34 requires that certain information be submitted with a request for a ruling that an individual’s expatriation did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. A submitted all the information required by Notice 98-34, including any additional information requested by the Service after review of the submission.

A is eligible to request a ruling pursuant to Notice 98-34 because he has become a resident fully liable to income tax in the country in which he was born. A submitted his request within one year of expatriation.

Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude that A has made a complete and good faith submission in accordance with section 877(c)(1)(B) and Notice 98-34. Therefore, A will not be presumed under section 877(a)(2) to have as one of his principal purposes for expatriating the avoidance of U.S. taxes. It is further concluded that A will not be treated under section 877(a)(2) as having as one of his principal purposes of expatriating the avoidance of U.S. taxes.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. In addition, no opinion is expressed as to A’s U.S. tax liability for taxable periods prior to his loss of permanent residence status or for taxable periods after his loss of permanent residence status under sections of the Code other than sections 877, 2107, and 2501(a)(3).

A copy of this letter must be attached to A’s U.S. income tax return for the year in

PLR-163742-01
Page 3

which A obtained the ruling.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter will be sent to A and A’s second representative.

Sincerely yours,
W. EDWARD WILLIAMS
Senior Technical Reviewer
Branch 1
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(International)

cc: