PLR 200206028: Shareholders avoid gain on an exchange of retained non equity rights

Number
200206028
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Recapitalization (Type "E")
Code sections
§ 351, § 368, § 1001
Ruling dated
November 8, 2001
Publicly released
February 8, 2002

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2002
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer planned a restructuring in which its shareholders would exchange several classes of stock for corresponding classes of stock in a new parent company. The IRS had previously treated related non equity rights separately for analysis and had ruled on the broader reorganization and recapitalization. In this supplemental ruling, the IRS concluded that the shareholders would not recognize gain or loss attributable to their retained non equity rights in the stock exchange. The conclusion relied on the submitted facts, representations, and the prior separation of the equity interests and non equity rights.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Will shareholders recognize gain or loss on retained non equity rights when they exchange the taxpayer's stock for stock in a new parent?
  • Outcome: Approved, no gain or loss was recognized on the retained rights under the described exchange.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 351, 368, 1001; Rev. Proc. 2001-1.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200206028
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 2/8/2002
Index Number: 368.05-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:
(202) 622-7790
Refer Reply To:
CC:CORP:B03-PLR-137416-01
Date:
November 8, 2001

Taxpayer
=

New Parent
=

Date A
=

Date B
=

State X
=

c
=

d
=

e
=

f
=

We respond to your letter dated July 10, 2001, requesting a ruling supplementing the rulings previously issued in PLR-100524-00 (the Original Letter Ruling). The material information submitted for consideration is summarized below.

In the Original Letter Ruling, we issued rulings under §§ 368 and 1001 of the Internal Revenue Code regarding a plan for a reorganization and recapitalization, which 2 PLR-137416-01

resulted with members holding certain Equity Interests and Non-Equity Rights. In the Original Ruling Letter, we stated that, although the Non-Equity Rights are associated with the Class B Equity Interests, the Non-Equity Rights are not attributes of equity. We deemed a separation of the Equity Interests and the Non-Equity Rights for analytical purposes and ruled that the members of Taxpayer would not recognize any gain or loss on deemed exchanges for Equity Interests and Non-Equity Rights in Newco (now referred to herein as Taxpayer). This transaction was consummated as of Date A.

On Date B, the board of directors of Taxpayer authorized preparations for additional restructuring. Accordingly, Taxpayer proposes to engage in the following steps:

(i) Taxpayer will form a new wholly-owned subsidiary, New Parent, a State X for-profit corporation;

(ii) New Parent will form a new wholly-owned subsidiary, Transitory, a State X for-profit corporation; and

(iii) Taxpayer will merge with and into Transitory in accordance with State X law, with Taxpayer surviving the transaction. Shareholders of Taxpayer will exchange their Class A and Class B shares in Taxpayer for Class A and Class B shares in New Parent in the following manner: Each share of Taxpayer Class A stock will be converted into one share of New Parent Class A stock, each share of Taxpayer Series B-1 stock will be converted into c shares of New Parent Class A stock and one share of New Parent Series B-1 stock, each share of Taxpayer Series B-2 stock will be converted into d shares of New Parent Class A stock and one share of New Parent Series B-2 stock, each share of Taxpayer Series B-3 stock will be converted into e shares of New Parent Class A stock and one share of New Parent Series B-3 stock, and each share of Taxpayer Series B-4 stock will be converted into f shares of New Parent Class A stock and one share of New Parent Series B-4 stock.

Taxpayer represents that, subject only to the resolution of the issue addressed in the ruling below, the transfer of Class A and Class B common stock of Taxpayer in exchange for Class A and Class B common stock of New Parent will constitute a transfer described in § 351 of the Code.

Based solely on the information submitted, the representation set forth above, and the separation of Equity Interests and Non-Equity Rights, we hold that the shareholders of Taxpayer will not recognize any gain or loss attributable to their retained Non-Equity Rights when they exchange their Class A and respective series of Class B shares in Taxpayer for Class A and Class B shares of New Parent. 3 PLR-137416-01

The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon the facts and representations submitted by the taxpayers and accompanied by a penalties of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the materials submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the information, representations, and other data may be required as part of the audit process. See section 12.04 of Rev. Proc. 2001-1, 2001-1 I.R.B. 1, 46, which discusses in greater detail the revocation or modification of ruling letters. However, when the criteria in section 12.05 of Rev. Proc. 2001-1, 2001-1 I.R.B. at 47, are satisfied, a ruling is not revoked or modified retroactively except in rare or unusual circumstances.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer(s) requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter should be attached to the federal income tax returns of the taxpayers involved for the taxable year in which the transaction covered by this ruling letter is consummated.

Sincerely yours,

Filiz A. Serbes
Chief, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Corporate)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace