PLR 200205042: Fund may revoke its distribution timing election

Number
200205042
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Excise Tax on Undistributed Income of Regulated Investment Companies
Topics
Code sections
§ 851, § 988, § 1222, § 1296, § 4982
Ruling dated
November 7, 2001
Publicly released
February 1, 2002

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2002
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A regulated investment company had elected to use its calendar tax year instead of the period ending October 31 when calculating part of its required distributions under section 4982. It asked to revoke that election because it created administrative burdens, and represented that revocation would not produce a tax benefit through hindsight or prejudice the government. The IRS consented to revocation effective for 2001 and later years. For 2001, the fund must use the January 1 through October 31 period for specified capital gain and foreign currency calculations. As a condition of consent, it may not make the same election again for 2002 through 2006.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the fund revoke its section 4982(e)(4)(A) election and return to the October 31 measurement period?
  • Outcome: Approved, with a five year restriction on making a new election.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 4982(b), 4982(e)(2), 4982(e)(4)-(6), 988.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200205042
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 2/1/2002
Index Number: 4982.00-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:FIP:1-PLR-154811-01
Date:
November 7, 2001

Fund =
State A =

Dear :

This is in reply to a letter dated October 2, 2001, requesting rulings on behalf of Fund. Fund requests a ruling granting permission for calendar year 2001 and subsequent calendar years to revoke an election under § 4982(e)(4)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code to use Fund's tax year (the calendar year) in lieu of the 1-year period ending October 31, for purposes of calculating the required distribution amount under § 4982(b)(1)(B), § 4982(e)(2), § 4982(e)(5), and § 4982(e)(6). Further, Fund requests a ruling that in calculating the required distribution under § 4982 for the calendar year ending December 31, 2001, Fund's capital gain net income shall be determined on the basis of capital gains and losses realized and recognized during the 10-month period beginning on January 1, 2001, and ending on October 31, 2001; and its ordinary income shall be determined by including foreign currency gains and losses attributable to transactions under § 988 that are properly taken into account for the 10-month period beginning on January 1, 2001, and ending on October 31, 2001.

Facts:

Fund is a State A corporation that is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a no-load, non-diversified open-end investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq. Fund has elected and qualified to be treated as a regulated investment company (RIC) under subchapter M of Chapter 1 of the Code. Fund is treated as a separate corporation under § 851(g) for federal income tax purposes.

For calendar year 1998 (and subsequent years), Fund elected under § 4982(e)(4)(A) to use its calendar tax year in lieu of the 1-year period ending on October 31, for purposes of calculating the required distribution amount under

2
PLR-154811-01

§ 4982(b)(1)(B), § 4982(e)(2), § 4982(e)(5), and § 4982(e)(6). Fund assumed that the election would relieve the administrative burden associated with dual calculations of capital gain net income and § 988 gain or loss under the excise tax and subchapter M regimes. However, Fund's experience is that the election has created additional administrative complexities primarily due to time constraints in declaring required distributions to avoid the excise tax imposed by § 4982. Further, the promulgation of regulations that coordinate the excise tax and subchapter M rules has greatly reduced the administrative burden of having a tax year different from the period for determining Fund's required distributions under § 4982.

Fund represents that:

1. Its desire to revoke its election is due to administrative and non-tax related financial burdens caused by the election;

2. It is not seeking to revoke its election to preserve or secure a tax benefit;

3. It will neither benefit through hindsight nor prejudice the interests of the government as a result of being permitted to revoke the election; and

4. It will not make a subsequent election under § 4982(e)(4)(A) for five calendar years following the year of the grant of revocation.

Law and Analysis:

Section 4982(a), which was enacted as part of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and is effective for calendar years beginning after December 31, 1986, imposes an excise tax on every RIC for each calendar year equal to 4 percent of the excess (if any) of the "required distribution" for the calendar year over the "distributed amount" for the calendar year.

Section 4982(b)(1) defines "required distribution" to mean, with respect to any calendar year, the sum of 98 percent of the RIC's ordinary income for such calendar year, plus 98 percent of the RIC's capital gain net income for the 1-year period ending on October 31 of such calendar year.

Section 4982(e)(2)(A) provides that for purposes of § 4982, in general, the term "capital gain net income" has the meaning given to that term by § 1222(9), but determined by treating the 1-year period ending on October 31 of the calendar year as the RIC's tax year.

Section 4982(e)(2)(B) reduces the RIC's capital gain net income, but not below the RIC's net capital gain, by the amount of the RIC's net ordinary loss for the calendar year. Section 4982(e)(2)(C)(i) provides that, for purposes of § 4982, the term "net

3
PLR-154811-01

capital gain" has the meaning given that term by § 1222(11), but determined by treating the 1-year period ending on October 31 of the calendar year as the RIC's tax year.

Section 4982(e)(4)(A) provides that if the tax year of a RIC ends with the month of November or December, the RIC may elect to have the capital gain net income for its tax year applied in lieu of the 1-year period ending on October 31 of the calendar year for purposes of satisfying the required distribution defined under § 4982(b)(1). Section 4982(e)(4)(B) provides that, once made, such election may be revoked only with the consent of the Secretary.

Section 4982(e)(5) provides that any foreign currency gain or loss attributable to a § 988 transaction and which is properly taken into account for the portion of the calendar year after October 31 shall not be taken into account in determining the amount of the ordinary income of the RIC for the calendar year but shall be taken into account in determining the RIC's ordinary income in the following calendar year. However, if a RIC has made an election under § 4982(e)(4), the preceding sentence shall be applied by substituting the last day of the RIC's tax year for October 31.

Section 4982(e)(6)(A) provides that for purposes of determining a RIC’s ordinary income, § 1296 shall be applied as if the RIC's tax year ended on October 31. Section 4982(e)(6)(B) provides that any ordinary gain or loss from an actual disposition of stock in a passive foreign investment company during the portion of the calendar year after October 31 shall be taken into account in determining the RIC's ordinary income for the following calendar year. However, if a RIC has made an election under § 4982(e)(4), the preceding two sentences shall be applied by substituting the last day of the RIC's tax year for October 31.

Based on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude that Fund's desire to revoke its election under § 4982(e)(4)(A) is due to administrative burdens and not because of any federal tax-related burden caused by the election. Fund does not seek to revoke its election to preserve or secure a federal tax benefit. Also, Fund will not benefit through hindsight or prejudice the interests of the government as a result of being permitted to revoke the election.

Conclusion:

Accordingly, pursuant to § 4982(e)(4), the Secretary consents to the revocation of Fund's election made under § 4982(e)(4)(A) effective for calendar year 2001 and for subsequent years. In calculating the "required distribution" for calendar year 2001, for purposes of § 4982(b)(1)(B) and § 4982(e)(2), the capital gain net income shall be determined on the basis of the capital gains and losses taken into account during the 10-month period from January 1, 2001, through October 31, 2001. Further, for calendar year 2001, the 10-month period from January 1, 2001, through October 31, 2001, shall be used for purposes of § 4982(e)(5).

4
PLR-154811-01

As a condition to the Secretary’s consenting to the revocations pursuant to § 4982(e)(4)(B), Fund may not make a subsequent election under § 4982(e)(4)(A) for a period of 5 calendar years following the year to which the grant of revocation applies, that is, 2002 through 2006.

Except as specifically ruled upon above, no opinion is expressed or implied as to any federal excise or income tax consequences of Fund.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely yours,
ALVIN J. KRAFT
Chief, Branch 1
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Financial Institutions & Products)

Enclosure:
Copy of this letter
Copy for 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace