IRS determination 200204052: Conditional waiver of pension funding excise tax

Number
200204052
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Determination Letter
IRS subject
Taxes on Failure to Meet Minimum Funding Standards
Topics
Code sections
§ 4971
Ruling dated
November 2, 2001
Publicly released
January 25, 2002

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's determination, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2002
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An employer requested waivers of the 100% excise tax on accumulated funding deficiencies in its money purchase pension plan for two plan years. The employer said its revenue fell after changes in government reimbursement rates, and the plan was later frozen and converted to a profit sharing plan. The IRS conditionally waived the tax under IRC § 4971(b) and ERISA § 3002(b). The employer had to allocate $54,510 to nonmanagement participants' accounts on the stated monthly payment schedule. If it failed to satisfy that condition, the waivers would be retroactively void.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Will the IRS waive the plan's 100% excise tax for its two funding deficiency years?
  • Outcome: Approved conditionally; the employer must make the specified participant allocations.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 4971(b); ERISA § 3002(b).

Full text (IRS public release)

COMMISSIONER
NOV 02 2001

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES

Significant Index No. 4971.02-00

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

200204052

T:EP:RA:T:A1
UIL: 4971.00-00

In re:

This letter constitutes notice that, with respect to the above-named money purchase pension plan, your request for waivers of the 100% excise tax under § 4971(b) of the Internal Revenue Code for the two plan years ended December 31, 1993-1994 has been conditionally granted. The conditional waivers have been granted for the tax that would otherwise apply to the accumulated funding deficiencies for those two plan years.

The conditional waivers of the 100% excise tax have been granted in accordance with

§ 3002(b) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The amount for which each of these conditional excise tax waivers has been granted is equal to 100 percent of the accumulated funding deficiency in the funding standard account to zero as of the end of each of the applicable plan years for which a waiver is granted to the extent such deficiency has not been corrected. Of course, because we have conditionally waived the 100% excise tax for these two plan years, the penalties and interest associated solely with respect to the excise taxes under § 4971(b) of the Code will be zero.

The New York State Department of Social Services (“DSS") changed eligibility standards for the Employer's clients in 1993. Therefore, DSS began to reimburse the Employer at 50% of the previous funding rate. DSS represents a major revenue source for the Employer. Accordingly, because the Employer was unable to replace that lost revenue it began to run a deficit. In addition to the DSS policy change, the county where the Employer provides services began in 1998 to provide reimbursement at a lower rate than the county had historically done. Also, according to the information received, the Plan was frozen in 1994 and converted into a profit-sharing plan of the Employer in 1995. Therefore, no additional participant allocations have been required since the end of the 1994 plan year.

200204052

These waivers are subject to the following condition:

The Employer will allocate to the accounts of all non-management Plan participants the difference between the required Plan contribution for such participants in 1993 less the contributions to the profit-sharing plan in 1995 for such participants. This amount equals $54,510. The payment schedule for this amount will be 12 monthly payments of $700 each followed by 24 monthly payments of $1,921.25. This payment schedule will commence in the month following the date of this letter.

In a letter sent by your authorized representative dated October 21, 2001, you agreed to this condition. If the condition is not satisfied, these waivers are retroactively null and void.

We have sent a copy of this letter to your authorized representative pursuant to a Form 2848 (Power of Attorney) on file with our office. We have also sent a copy of the letter to
the EP Classification Manager in
and to the EP Area Manager for
the
. If you have any questions, please
contact me. Or, you may contact

Sincerely,

[signature]

James E. Holland, Jr., Manager
Employee Plans Actuarial Group 1
Tax Exempt and Government Entities
Division

cc:

cc:

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace