PLR 200202054: Extra time granted for QSub election

Number
200202054
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Late Elections; Extension of Time for Making Certain Elections
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362, § 6110, § 9100
Ruling dated
October 11, 2001
Publicly released
January 11, 2002

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2002
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporation elected S corporation status and intended to elect qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub) treatment for its wholly owned subsidiary, but missed the QSub election deadline. The IRS found that the requirements for discretionary filing relief were met and gave the parent 60 days from the letter date to submit completed Forms 8869 with copies of the ruling. The release requests one redacted effective date but states a different redacted effective date in its conclusion, so the exact intended date is unclear from the public text. The IRS did not decide whether the parent was a valid S corporation or whether the subsidiary was a valid QSub.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the parent receive extra time to elect QSub treatment for its subsidiary?
  • Outcome: Approved: 60-day filing extension, with an effective date stated in the conclusion.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1361(b)(3)(B); Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200202054
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 1/11/2002
Index Number: 1362.01-03; 9100.00-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B1-PLR-147560-01
Date:
October 11, 2001

Legend:

X
=

Sub =
State =
Date 1 =
Date 2 =
Date 3 =

This letter responds to a letter dated August 15, 2001, written on behalf of X, requesting an extension of time under sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an election. X is requesting a ruling that it be granted an extension of time in which to elect to treat its wholly owned subsidiary, Y, as a qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub) under section 1361(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.

FACTS

The information submitted discloses that X was incorporated on Date 1 under the laws of State. X was to be taxed as a C Corporation. On Date 2, X purchased all of the shares of Y, a validly organized corporation under the laws of State, which was also taxed as a C Corporation.

X represents that it filed an election, which was accepted by the Internal Revenue Service, to become an S corporation effective Date 3. X intended to elect to treat Y as a qualified subchapter S subsidiary but failed to timely make the election. X requests a ruling that its section 1362(a) election to treat Y as a QSub will be treated as effective on Date 3.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1361(b)(3)(B) defines the term "qualified subchapter S subsidiary" as a domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation as defined in section 1361(b)(2), if (1) an S corporation holds 100 percent of the stock of the corporation, and (2) that S corporation elects to treat the subsidiary as a QSub. The election is made by 2 PLR-147560-01

filing Form 8869.

Under section 301.9100-1(c) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations, the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code except subtitles E, G, H and I, if the taxpayer demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting the relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term "regulatory election" as including an election whose deadline is prescribed by a notice published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section 310.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections, but does not apply to QSub elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do not meet the requirements of section 301.9100-2. Requests for relief under section 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

CONCLUSION

Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, the requirements of sections 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. As a result, X is granted an extension of time of sixty (60) days from the date of this letter to make an election to treat its wholly owned subsidiary, Y, as a QSub effective Date 2. X should submit the properly completed Forms 8869 to the relevant service center. A copy of this letter should be attached to each of the Forms 8869 filed with the service center.

Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed concerning whether X is a valid S corporation or whether its subsidiary, Y, is a valid QSub.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,
Paul F. Kugler
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace