PLR 200152023: Taxpayer granted time to file dual consolidated loss elections

Number
200152023
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Other; Dual Resident Corporation
Code sections
§ 1503, § 6110
Ruling dated
September 27, 2001
Publicly released
December 28, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer did not file elections and annual certifications concerning an entity's losses because its tax advisers believed an exception to the dual consolidated loss rules applied. They later learned that this view conflicted with the IRS position. The IRS found that the taxpayer met the standards for late election relief and granted 30 days from the ruling date to file the statements for three tax years and the annual certifications for losses in two of those years. The extension did not establish that the taxpayer was otherwise eligible to make the elections or certifications.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer file late elections and annual certifications under the dual consolidated loss rules?
  • Outcome: Approved: 30 days to file the specified statements and certifications.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1503; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1503-2(g)(2) and 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200152023
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 12/28/2001
Index Number: 9100.22-00
Person to Contact:
1503.04-04
Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:PLR-125904-00
Date:
September 27, 2001

LEGEND

Taxpayer
=
Entity
=
Date 1, 2, 3
=
Individual A, B
=

Dear

This replies to a letter dated October 31, 2000, in which Taxpayer requests an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to file the statement of election and agreement provided under § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) with respect to Entity for the tax years ended on Dates 1, 2 and 3, and to file the annual certification as required by § 1.1503- 2(g)(2)(vi) with respect to the losses of Entity incurred in the tax years ended on Dates 1 and 2. Additional information was submitted in a letter dated August 1, 2001. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process.

Individual A is the Vice President of Taxation for Taxpayer, and Individual B is a partner in CPA Firm. Because Individuals A and B concluded that the specific facts of Taxpayer qualified Taxpayer for the exception to the dual consolidated loss rules under
§ 1.1503-2(c)(5)(ii), Taxpayer did not elect to be bound by the elective relief provision of § 1.1503-2(g)(2) for the tax years ended on Dates 1, 2 and 3. Later, Individuals A and B learned that their conclusion was inconsistent with the position of the IRS that the losses of Entity were subject to the dual consolidated loss rules.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in § 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except 2

In re: PLR-125904-00

subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
§ 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, § 1.1503-2(g)(2) fixes the time to file the statement of election and agreement, and the annual certification. Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100–1(c) to grant Taxpayer an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the standards set forth in § 301.9100-3(a).

Based on the facts and circumstances of this case, we conclude that Taxpayer satisfies § 301.9100-3(a). Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time until 30 days from the date of this ruling letter to file the statement of election and agreement provided under § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) with respect to Entity for the tax years ended on Dates 1, 2 and 3, and to file the annual certification as required by § 1.1503- 2(g)(2)(vi) with respect to the losses of Entity incurred in the tax years ended on Dates 1 and 2.

The granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to file the statements of elections and agreements, and the annual certifications. § 301.9100-1(a).

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this ruling letter should be associated with the statements of elections and agreements, and the annual certifications.

No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling letter is being furnished to your authorized representatives.

Sincerely,
Allen Goldstein
Reviewer
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (International)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace