Ezel / IRS Rulings / 200149024

CCA 200149024: Business remains a Railroad Retirement Tax Act employer

Number
200149024
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Employers v. Not Employers
Topics
Employment taxes
Code sections
§ 3231
Ruling dated
September 5, 2001
Publicly released
December 7, 2001
Source
View Official PDF

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A redacted business asked the Railroad Retirement Board to reconsider whether it remained an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act. The Board gave its opinion to the IRS. Chief Counsel reviewed that opinion and the information submitted to the Board, then concluded that the business continued to be an employer under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. The memorandum directs the service center to act on that conclusion but does not describe the business or the Board's reasoning.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the business continue to be an employer under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act?
  • Outcome: Advice given: yes, it remained an employer.
  • Key authorities: Railroad Retirement Tax Act; Railroad Retirement Act; Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
I N T E R N AL R E V E N U E S E R V I C E WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

SEP 05, 2001

Number: 200149024
Release Date: 12/7/2001
CC:TEGE:EOEG:ET1 - COR-131236-01
UILC: 3231.01-00

MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE CENTER Kansas City, MO

.Attn: Entity Control

FROM: Office of Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel
(Tax Exempt and Government Entities)

SUBJECT: CC:TEGE:EOEG:ET1 - COR-131236-01
Railroad Retirement Act Tax Status

In accordance with the coordination procedure established between the Service and the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB), the RRB has provided us with its opinion concerning a reconsideration request from the following business as to whether it continues to be an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act:

We have reviewed the opinion of the RRB and, based upon the information submitted to the RRB, we also conclude that
continues to be an employer under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. Please take the appropriate action regarding this business.

Will E. McLeod

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace