CCA 200149009: Health insurer deduction is calculated for each group member

Number
200149009
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Separate Taxable Income
Code sections
§ 833, § 832, § 1502, § 172
Ruling dated
August 20, 2001
Publicly released
December 7, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A consolidated group contained two organizations eligible for the deduction under § 833 and other companies. Chief Counsel advised that each eligible organization must calculate its own deduction and taxable income limit using only its own health-related items, including related net operating losses. Group taxable income cannot supply a deduction to a member with no health-related taxable income. For an organization joining the group midyear, the deduction can be calculated for the full year and allocated between periods if the needed items cannot be clearly determined from permanent records; otherwise, each period is calculated separately. The separate return limitation year rules affect consolidated use of losses but do not change this member-level § 833 calculation.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: How do consolidated return and loss limitation rules affect each member's § 833 deduction?
  • Outcome: Advice given: calculate separately for each eligible member, with allocation between periods dependent on its records.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 172, 832, 833; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1502-11, 1.1502-12, 1.1502-21(c)(2)(ii), former 1.1502-76(b)(4).

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
I N T E R N AL R E V E N U E S E R V I C E WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

OFFICE OF
CHIEF COUNSEL
August 20, 2001

Number: 200149009
Release Date: 12/7/2001
CC:DOM:CORP
TL-N-7097-00
UILC: 1502.12-00

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE FIELD SERVICE ADVICE

MEMORANDUM FOR ASSOCIATE AREA COUNSEL
(Large and Mid-Size Business)

CHARLES W. MAURER, JR.
ATTORNEY (LMSB)

FROM: Edward S. Cohen
Chief, CC:CORP:2

SUBJECT: Regence Ordering Rule

This Chief Counsel Advice responds to your memorandum. In accordance with I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3), this Chief Counsel Advice should not be cited as precedent.
Unless otherwise specified, citations refer to the regulations effective at the time of the transaction.

LEGEND

Date 1
=

Date 2
=

Date 3
=

Year 1
=

ISSUES

1. Where a consolidated group includes two organizations described in Internal Revenue Code § 833 (I.R.C. § 833 organizations) and a non-insurance subgroup, how should the taxable income limitation on the I.R.C. § 833(b) deduction be computed?
2
TL-N-7097-00

  1. Where a consolidated group includes two I.R.C. § 833 organizations, should
    the taxable income limitation on the I.R.C. § 833(b) deduction be computed
    separately for each organization, or should all such organizations be
    combined for computation purposes?

  2. If an I.R.C. § 833 organization joins a consolidated group on Date 2, and
    ratably allocates its items between the separate and consolidated periods,
    how should the I.R.C. § 833(b) deduction be computed?

  3. If an I.R.C. § 833 organization joins a consolidated group on Date 2, and its
    short taxable year ending Date 1 resulted in a loss which created a SRLY
    NOL deduction for that organization in the consolidated return for the year
    ending Date 3, how should the SRLY limitations be applied in computing the
    I.R.C. § 833(b) deduction?

CONCLUSIONS

  1. An I.R.C. § 833 organization that is a member of a consolidated group
    calculates its I.R.C. § 833 deduction in the same manner as it would if it filed
    a separate return. For purposes of computing the I.R.C. § 833 deduction
    taxable income limitation, each I.R.C. § 833 organization should compute its
    own taxable income as defined by I.R.C. § 832(a) (including the deductions
    allowed by I.R.C. § 833(c)) by only taking into account its health-related
    items as required by I.R.C. § 833(b)(4).

  2. Each I.R.C. § 833 organization should separately compute its own I.R.C.
    § 833 deduction and its own deduction limitation under I.R.C. § 833(b)(2) by
    only using the corporation’s own health-related items.

  3. Where an I.R.C. § 833 organization allocates items ratably between separate
    and consolidated periods, the corporation determines its I.R.C. § 833
    deduction for the entire year and then allocates part of the deduction to each
    period.

  4. The SRLY limitation does not affect the calculation of the I.R.C. § 833
    deduction. Sub calculates its I.R.C. § 833 deduction and then determines
    the deduction limitation by determining taxable income under I.R.C. § 832
    taking into account its health-related NOLs.

FACTS

Parent, an organization described under I.R.C. § 833, is the common parent of a consolidated group that includes non-insurance companies. Parent acquired Sub, another I.R.C. § 833 organization, on Date 2. 3 TL-N-7097-00

For Sub’s short taxable year ending Date 1, Sub filed a separate return. For the period from Date 2 to Date 3, Sub was included in Parent’s consolidated return. Sub reported a loss for its short taxable year ending Date 1, without taking into consideration an available net operating loss carryforward. Sub also reported a loss for the short taxable year it was a member of the Parent. The Parent consolidated group had positive taxable income for the tax year ending Date 3.

Sub calculated the I.R.C. § 833 deduction amount, absent the taxable income limitation of I.R.C. § 833(b)(4), on a full-year basis using its ending adjusted surplus from Year 1. Sub took this figure and ratably allocated the amount to the short taxable year ending Date 1 and the consolidated return year ending Date 3. Sub reported the figure allocable to the period it was included in the consolidated return as its I.R.C. § 833 deduction. The taxpayer determined there was no I.R.C.
§ 833(b)(2) limitation on the deduction. Sub contributed no taxable income to the group.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

  1. Where a consolidated group includes two I.R.C. § 833 organizations and a
    non-insurance subgroup, how should the taxable income limitation on the
    I.R.C. § 833(b) deduction be computed?

    We concur with the conclusion in your memorandum. Section 833(a) allows
    I.R.C. § 833 organizations a deduction for any taxable year equal to the excess (if any) of (A) 25 percent of the sum of (i) the claims incurred during the taxable year and liabilities incurred during the taxable year under cost-plus contracts, and (ii) the expenses incurred during the taxable year in connection with the administration, adjustment, or settlement of claims, over (B) the adjusted surplus as of the beginning of the taxable year. I.R.C. § 833(b). This deduction is limited by I.R.C.
    § 833(b)(2), which provides that "the deduction determined under paragraph (1) for any taxable year shall not exceed taxable income for such taxable year (determined without regard to such deduction)."

    Section 832(a) provides, in part, that "taxable income" means the gross
    income as defined in I.R.C. § 832(b)(1) less the deductions allowed by I.R.C.
    § 832(c). Thus, because I.R.C. § 832(c)(10) allows a deduction for NOL carryovers permitted under I.R.C. § 172, the I.R.C. § 833 organization must reduce its taxable income attributable to health-related items by the portion of its NOL carryover attributable to health-related items in determining the I.R.C. § 833(b)(2) limitation.

    Section 833(b)(4) provides that any determination under this subsection shall
    be made by only taking into account items attributable to the health-related business of the taxpayer. Thus, the computation of the amount of the deduction under I.R.C. § 833(b)(1) and the taxable income limitation under (b)(2) take into 4 TL-N-7097-00

account only the items that are attributable to the health-related business of the I.R.C. § 833 organization.

To the extent the organization has no health-related taxable income after applying health-related NOLs, it is not entitled to a I.R.C. § 833 deduction. In the facts presented above, under a separate entity calculation of the I.R.C. § 833 deduction, Sub is not entitled to an I.R.C. § 833 deduction for either its short taxable year ending Date 1 or for the portion of the year it is included in Parent’s consolidated return ending Date 3, provided that Sub did not have health-related taxable income for the taxable year. I.R.C. § 833(b)(4).

The consolidated return regulations modify the calculation of tax for corporations filing a consolidated return. However, the Code is applicable to the group to the extent the regulations do not exclude its application. Treas. Reg.
§ 1.1502-80.

In this case, the consolidated return regulations do not change the application of I.R.C. § 833. Section 1.1502-11 sets forth how a consolidated group determines its taxable income. This section provides that the consolidated taxable income for a consolidated return year shall be determined by taking into account the separate taxable income, as defined by Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-12, of each member of the group, and the specific enumerated items that are calculated on a consolidated basis. Section 833 deduction is not listed in Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-11 as one of the items calculated on a consolidated basis. Therefore, a member entitled to the I.R.C. § 833 deduction must factor in the deduction when determining separate taxable income under Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-12 unless that regulation section provides otherwise.

Section 1.1502-12 provides that the separate taxable income of a member is computed in accordance with the provisions of the Code covering the determination of taxable income of separate corporations subject to specified enumerated modifications. Section 833 is not one of the listed modifications. Therefore, an I.R.C. § 833 organization allowed by the Code to take the I.R.C. § 833 deduction is allowed the deduction in computing its separate taxable income under Treas. Reg.
§ 1.1502-12.

Because the consolidated return regulations do not modify the calculation of the I.R.C. § 833 deduction, Parent and Sub each calculate the deduction, including the limitation thereon, under the Code (I.R.C. § 833) as if each filed a separate return. Because I.R.C. § 833(a) provides that these organizations determine their taxable income as stock insurance companies under I.R.C. § 832, I.R.C. § 832 is used to determine taxable income for purposes of the limitation. However, only health-related items are used in the calculation. 5 TL-N-7097-00

  1. Where a consolidated group includes two I.R.C. § 833 organizations, should
    the taxable income limitation on the I.R.C. § 833(b) deduction be computed
    separately for each organization, or should all such organizations be
    combined for computation purposes?

    We agree with your conclusion. As stated above, the deduction and
    

    limitation should be calculated separately for each organization in the consolidated group. In a separate return context, each I.R.C. § 833 organization must calculate its taxable income under I.R.C. § 832 using only health-related items to determine the I.R.C. § 833(b)(2) limitation on the deduction. I.R.C. § 833(b)(4).

  2. If an I.R.C. § 833 organization joins a consolidated group on Date 2, and
    ratably allocates items between the separate and consolidated periods, how
    should the I.R.C. § 833(b) deduction be computed?

    The information submitted indicates that the taxpayer elected to allocate
    items pursuant to Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-76(b)(2)(ii). However, that section is effective for acquisitions after January 1, 1995. For acquisitions prior to January 1, 1995, such as the acquisition of Sub on Date 1, former Treas. Reg. § 1.1502- 76(b)(4)(i) provided that the taxable income to be reported in each such return shall be determined on the basis of the Target member’s income shown on its permanent records (including work papers). If a portion of an item of income or deduction to be reported in each return cannot be clearly determined from the permanent records, the portion of such item to be included in each such return shall be the amount of the item for the full taxable year ratably allocated to each return based on the number of days included in each return. Former Treas. Reg. § 1.1502- 76(b)(4)(ii).

    Whether or not the items necessary to calculate the I.R.C. § 833 deduction
    can be determined from Sub’s permanent records is a factual question that may decided by your office. If you determine that the items cannot be clearly determined from the permanent records, then we concur with your conclusion that the I.R.C. § 833 deduction is determined on a full-year basis and then ratably allocated to each period, rather than allocating each item to a period and then calculating the allowable deduction separately for each period.

    If you determine the items necessary to calculate the I.R.C. § 833 deduction
    can be determined from the permanent records, then the entire calculation should be done by treating each period as a separate tax year. See Former Treas. Reg.
    § 1.1502-76(d). For example, as you point out, “adjusted surplus” forms the base for the deduction calculation. “Adjusted surplus” is a cumulative amount adjusted each tax year by the preceding taxable years’s adjusted taxable income or decreased by the preceding taxable year’s adjusted net operating loss. I.R.C.
    § 833(b)(3). In this case, “adjusted surplus” should be calculated for the short 6 TL-N-7097-00

period ending Date 1 and again for Sub’s year ending Date 3 by treating each period as a separate taxable year. Former Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-76(d).

  1. If an I.R.C. § 833 organization joins a consolidated group on Date 2, and its
    short taxable year ending Date 1 resulted in a loss that created a SRLY NOL
    deduction for that organization in the consolidated return for the year ending
    Date 3, how should the SRLY limitations be applied in computing the I.R.C.
    § 833(b) deduction?

    We agree with your conclusion. Because each I.R.C. § 833 organization
    calculates its own I.R.C. § 833 deduction and its taxable income limitation separately as if it filed a separate return, the fact that the Sub has losses incurred in a separate limitation year (SRLY) does not change Sub’s I.R.C. § 833 calculation.

    Section 1.1502-1(e) and (f), in general, define a separate return limitation
    year (SRLY) as a taxable year of a corporation for which it files a separate return or for which it joins in the filing of a consolidated return by another group. Section 1.1502-21(c)(2)(ii) limits the offsetting of net operating losses arising in a SRLY against consolidated taxable income.

    As discussed above, the consolidated return regulations do not change the
    calculation of the I.R.C. § 833 deduction. The SRLY limitations only apply when calculating consolidated taxable income. Therefore, in determining the I.R.C. § 833 deduction, Sub’s health-related NOLs from prior years would offset any positive taxable income from health-related items for the year ending Date 3 even though SRLY would restrict the use of the NOL against the Parent group’s consolidated taxable income in the return for the taxable year ending Date 3.

CASE DEVELOPMENT, HAZARDS AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

This memorandum does not address the application of Treas. Reg. § 1.172- 5(a) which determines the amount of net operating loss which shall be carried to other taxable years. Application of Treas. Reg. § 1.172-5(a) was addressed in previous memoranda. The National Office’s position on the application of Treas. Reg. § 1.172-5(a) has not changed.

This writing may contain privileged information. Any unauthorized disclosure of this writing may have an adverse effect on privileges, such as the attorney client privilege. If disclosure becomes necessary, please contact this office for our views.

Please call Guy Barry at (202) 622-8012 if you have any further questions.

Edward S. Cohen
Chief, Branch 2 (Corporate)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace