PLR 200148001: Later asset purchase leaves earlier corporate split ruling intact
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS had previously ruled on a tax-free separation of two corporate groups under §§ 351, 355, and 368. After the distribution, the groups still had service agreements with one another. They proposed ending those agreements and having one group buy assets used by the other because of unforeseen business and market conditions. In this supplemental ruling, the IRS said the separation measures, including the asset purchase, would not adversely affect the earlier ruling, which remained in force. The letter does not restate every term of the earlier ruling.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Would terminating service agreements and buying assets disturb the earlier corporate separation ruling?
- Outcome: Approved; the prior ruling remains in force.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 351, 355, 368(a)(1)(D).
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Number: 200148001
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 11/30/2001
Index Number: 368.00-00 355.00-00
Person to Contact:
Telephone Number:
(202) 622-7770
Refer Reply To:
CC:CORP:2-PLR-120721-01
Date:
April 20, 2001
Legend:
Distributing 2
=
Distributing 1
=
Controlled
=
Sub A
=
Sub D
=
LLC
=
x
=
y
=
z
=
Service A
=
Agreement 1
=
Agreement 2
=
City U
=
Dear:
We respond to your letter dated April 6, 2001, requesting a supplemental ruling to PLR 100247-00, a ruling letter issued on June 7, 2000 (“Prior Ruling Letter”). In the Prior Ruling Letter we ruled that the Controlled Group could separate from the 2 PLR-120721-01
Distributing Group under §§ 351, 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code.
The Prior Ruling addresses certain federal income tax consequences of a proposed transaction intended to separate Controlled and its affiliated entities (the “Controlled Group”) from Distributing 2 and its affiliated entities (the “Distributing Group”). The Prior Ruling Letter held, in part, that (i) the transfer by Distributing 1to Controlled of the stock of certain Distributing 1 subsidiaries, including Sub A, and certain other assets, including the right to use certain distribution facilities located in City U and certain associated assets and leases (collectively, the “City U Assets”), in exchange for the constructive issuance of additional Controlled stock, cash and the assumption by Controlled of certain liabilities; (ii) the subsequent transfer by Controlled of the City U Assets and certain other assets to Sub A in exchange for the constructive issuance of additional Sub A stock and Sub A’s assumption of certain liabilities (collectively (i) and (ii) are hereinafter “the Contributions”); and (iii) the distribution of the more than 80% of the stock of Controlled from Distributing 1 to Distributing 2, followed by the distribution of such Controlled stock to Distributing 2’s shareholders (collectively, the “Distributions”), were tax-free under sections 351, 355, and 368(a)(1)(D). The Distributions were effected on Date A.
At the time of the Distributions, Distributing 1 and Sub A still had a business relationship due to Distributing 1 and Sub A entering into Agreement 1. In addition, prior to the Distributing Group’s acquisition of LLC (the predecessor of Sub D) on Date B, the Controlled Group had entered into Agreement 2 with LLC to provide Service A. Upon the acquisition of LLC by the Distributing Group, Agreement 2 was assigned to and assumed by Sub D.
Due to certain business circumstances and market conditions that were unforeseen at the time the Distributions were effected, the Distributing Group and the Controlled Group desire to terminate Agreement 1 and Agreement 2 in order to accelerate a more complete separation of their existing business relations (the “Separation”).
In order to accelerate the separation, the Distributing Group and Controlled Group will undertake various measures, including:
(1) Agreement 1 and Agreement 2 will be terminated and the parties will waive or otherwise resolve all claims thereunder.
(2) The Distributing Group will acquire certain assets, including the City U assets, currently used by the Controlled Group to provide Service A to Distributing 1 under Agreement 1 and to Sub D under Agreement 2 (the “Purchase”).
Based upon the information and representations submitted with the original and supplemental ruling requests, we rule that the Separation, including the Purchase, will have no adverse effect on the Prior Letter Ruling and the Prior Letter Ruling remains in 3 PLR-120721-01
full force and effect.
This supplemental ruling is directed only to the taxpayers requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, copies of this letter are being sent to your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate)
By: Lewis K Brickates
Assistant to Chief, Branch 2
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace