PLR 200146029: Entity gets more time to elect partnership tax classification

Number
200146029
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Classification of Certain Business Entities
Code sections
§ 7701
Ruling dated
August 9, 2001
Publicly released
November 16, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An entity with two owners intended to be classified as a partnership for federal tax purposes, but Form 8832 was not filed on time. The IRS analyzed the entity classification election rules and found that the requirements for late filing relief were met. It granted 60 days from the letter to file the election with the intended effective date. The released facts use the same placeholder for both a company said to be incorporated abroad and a domestic limited liability company, so the precise entity structure is unclear. The ruling does not address other tax consequences.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the entity file Form 8832 late to elect partnership classification from the intended effective date?
  • Outcome: Approved: a 60-day extension to file the election.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 301.7701-3, 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200146029
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 11/16/2001
Index Numbers: 7701.00-00; 9100.31-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:3 PLR-118707-01
Date:
August 9, 2001

LEGEND:

W
=

X
=

Y
=

Z
=

D1
=

Country =

Dear

This letter responds to a letter dated March 29, 2001, and subsequent correspondence written on behalf of Z, requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an election to be classified as a partnership under § 301.7701-3(c).

FACTS

According to the information submitted, X was incorporated on D1 under the laws of Country. X, a domestic limited liability company that is a disregarded entity for federal tax purposes, and Y, a Country corporation, are the sole shareholders of Z. W, a domestic S corporation, is the sole owner of X. It is represented that the members of Z have limited liability within the meaning of § 301.7701-3(b)(2)(ii). W, X, and Y intended to have Z classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes effective D1. However, due to inadvertence, Form 8832, Entity Classification Election, was not timely filed.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 301.7701-3(a) allows a business entity that is not classified as a corporation under § 301.7701-2(b)(1), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), or (8) (an eligible entity) to elect its classification for federal tax purposes as provided in § 301.7701-3. An eligible

PLR-118707-01
2

entity with at least two members can elect to be classified as either an association (and thus a corporation under § 301.7701-2(b)(2)) or a partnership.

Section 301.7701-3(b)(2)(i)(B) provides that, unless the entity elects otherwise, a foreign eligible entity is an association if all members have limited liability.

Section 301.7701-3(c)(1)(i) provides that an eligible entity may elect to be classified as other than its default classification in § 301.7701-3(b) by filing Form 8832 with the appropriate service center. Section 301.7701-3(c)(1)(iii) provides that the effective date specified on the Form 8832 cannot be more than 75 days prior to the date on which the election is filed and cannot be more than 12 months after the date on which the election is filed.

Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term "regulatory election" as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register, or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election.

Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

CONCLUSION

Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Consequently, Z is granted an extension of time for making the election to be classified as a partnership effective D1, until 60 days following the date of this letter. The election should be made by following the procedures set forth in Form 8832 and a copy of this letter should be attached to the election.

Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed or implied as to the federal tax consequences of the transaction described above under any other

PLR-118707-01
3

provision of the Code.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer on whose behalf it was requested.
Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Under a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of this letter to Z’s authorized representative.

Sincerely yours,
PAUL F. KUGLER
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosures: 2
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace