PLR 200146021: Taxpayer gets time to file loss agreement and certifications

Number
200146021
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Dual Resident Corporation
Code sections
§ 1503
Ruling dated
July 16, 2001
Publicly released
November 16, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer deducted part of an entity's operating loss on a U.S. consolidated return but inadvertently omitted an agreement and certifications required by the dual consolidated loss regulations. It sought more time before the IRS discovered the omission and supported the request with an affidavit describing its reliance on a tax adviser. The IRS found that the taxpayer satisfied the standards for late filing relief. It gave the taxpayer 30 days to file the agreement and certifications. The extension did not determine whether the taxpayer was otherwise eligible to file them.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the taxpayer file the required loss agreement and certifications after the return deadline?
  • Outcome: Approved: a 30-day extension, without a ruling on underlying eligibility.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200146021
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 11/16/2001
Index Number: 9100.22-00
Person to Contact:
1503.04-04
Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:PLR-125906-00
Date:
July 16, 2001

LEGEND

Taxpayer
=

Entity
=

Date One
=

Individual A
=

CPA Firm
=

Dear :

This replies to a letter dated October 30, 2000, in which Taxpayer requests an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to file the agreement and certifications described in § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) with respect to Entity for the tax year ended on Date One. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process.

Entity elected to be classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Entity generated an operating loss, which was passed through, in part, to Taxpayer, and deducted on Taxpayer’s U.S. consolidated tax return for the tax year ended on Date One. The tax return was timely filed under extension. Through inadvertence, the agreement, including certifications, required under § 1.1503-2(g)((2)(i) was not filed with the tax return.

2

PLR-125906-00

Individual A is a tax partner with CPA Firm and was engaged by Taxpayer to provide advice regarding the steps necessary to allow Taxpayer to use the losses of Entity in Taxpayer’s consolidated tax return. Individual A’s affidavit describes the circumstances surrounding the failure to timely file the agreement and certifications required under § 1.1503-2-(g)(2)(i), and establishes that Taxpayer relied upon Individual A for advice regarding the use of Entity’s losses. Taxpayer is seeking relief before the failure to file the agreement is discovered by the IRS.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in § 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
§ 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, § 1503-2(g)(2)(i) fixes the time to file the agreement, including certifications, and, therefore, the agreement is a regulatory election under
§ 301.9100-1(b). Accordingly, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under
§ 301.9100-1(c) to grant Taxpayer an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the rules set forth in § 301.9100-3(a).

Based on the facts and circumstances of this case, we conclude that Taxpayer satisfies the standards of § 301.9100-3. Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time until 30 days from the date of this ruling letter to file the agreement and certifications described in § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) with respect to Entity for the tax year ended on Date One.

The granting of an extension of time to file the agreement is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to file the agreement. § 301.9100 -1(a).

No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented.

A copy of this ruling letter should be associated with the agreement.

3

PLR-125906-00

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.

Sincerely,
Allen Goldstein
Reviewer
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (International)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace