PLR 200145026: Unissued second class of stock did not affect S status
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A corporation's organizing documents authorized voting Class A stock and nonvoting Class B stock, but only Class A shares were issued during the period at issue. The corporation later eliminated distribution preferences between the classes. The IRS ruled that the corporation had only one class of stock during the period because no Class B stock was outstanding. It did not decide whether the corporation's original S election was valid under any other rule.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Did the corporation have more than one class of stock while its Class B shares were unissued?
- Outcome: No. The corporation had one class of stock during the stated period.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(a)(1), 1361(b)(1)(D); Treas. Reg. § 1.1361-1(l).
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Number: 200145026
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 11/9/2001
Index Number: 1362.00-00
Person to Contact:
Telephone Number:
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:1-PLR-120646-01
Date:
August 8, 2001
Legend:
X =
D1 =
D2 =
n1 =
This responds to a letter dated March 13, 2001, submitted on behalf of X, requesting a ruling that from D1 to D2 X had only one class of stock within the meaning of section 1361(b)(1)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code.
FACTS
X was incorporated on D1. X elected to be treated as an S corporation for federal tax purposes effective on D1. X’s organizing documents provided for Class A and Class B stock. The Class A stock was voting common stock with a right to distributions. The Class B stock was non-voting common stock with no right to distributions.
On D1, X issued n1 shares of Class A stock to each of X’s shareholders. No Class B stock was issued on D1, or at any time between D1 and D2. On D2, X eliminated all distribution preferences between the Class A stock and Class B stock.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 1361(a)(1) defines an S corporation as a small business corporation for which an election under section 1362(a) is in effect. Section 1361(b)(1) defines “small business corporation” as a domestic corporation that is not an ineligible corporation and that does not (A) have more than 75 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, other than a trust described in section 1361(c)(2), and other than an organization described in (c)(6)) who is not an individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more than one class of stock.
Section 1.1361-1(I)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that, except as provided in section 1.1361-1(I)(4) (relating to instruments, obligations, or arrangements
PLR-120646-01
2
treated as a second class of stock), a corporation is treated as having only one class of stock if all outstanding shares of stock of the corporation confer identical rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds. Differences in voting rights among shares of stock of a corporation are disregarded in determining whether a corporation has more than one class of stock. There was no Class B stock outstanding from D1 to D2, so for purposes of the one class of stock requirement, it is disregarded.
CONCLUSION
Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that from D1 to D2, X had only one class of stock within the meaning of section 1361(b)(1)(D).
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. Specifically, no opinion is expressed concerning whether the original election made by X to be treated as an S corporation was a valid election under section 1362.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer(s) requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
David R. Haglund
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
Enclosures (2) copy of this letter copy for § 6110 purposes
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace