PLR 200145022: Partnership received a conditional extension for a section 754 election

Number
200145022
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Section 754; Manner of Electing Optional Adjustment to Basis of Partnership Property
Code sections
§ 734, § 743, § 754
Ruling dated
August 8, 2001
Publicly released
November 9, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A partnership missed the deadline to elect a basis adjustment under section 754 after a partner died. It said its tax return preparer had not advised it of the election. The IRS found that the partnership met the requirements for late election relief and gave it 60 days to file the election. The relief was conditional: depreciation for an earlier year on property held by another party had to be computed without the section 743(b) adjustment, with a specified basis calculation for later depreciation. The IRS did not decide whether the partnership was otherwise eligible to make the election.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the partnership make a late section 754 basis adjustment election?
  • Outcome: Approved, subject to the stated depreciation condition and a 60-day filing deadline.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 734, 743, 754; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.754-1(b), 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200145022
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 11/9/2001
Index Number: 9100.15-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:3 PLR-121808-01
Date:
August 8, 2001

X:

M:

N:
a:
b:

Address:

Dear

This letter responds to a letter dated April 14, 2001, requesting an extension of time for X to elect under § 754 of the Internal Revenue Code to adjust the basis of partnership property. X represents the following facts.

M, a partner of X died in a. X filed its partnership return for the year of M’s death without a § 754 election, having relied on a professional tax return preparer who failed to advise X of the availability and benefits of such an election.

Section 754 provides that, if a partnership files an election, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the basis of partnership property shall be adjusted, in the case of a distribution of property, in the manner provided in § 734 and, in the case of a transfer of a partnership interest, in the manner provided in § 743. Such an election shall apply with respect to all distributions of property by the partnership and to all transfers of interests in the partnership during the tax year with respect to which the election was filed and all subsequent tax years.

Section 1.754-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that an election under § 754 and this section to adjust the basis of partnership property under §§ 734(b) and 743(b), with respect to a distribution of property to a partner or a transfer of an interest in a partnership, shall be made in a written statement filed with the partnership return for the tax year during which the distribution or transfer occurs. For the election 2 PLR-121808-01

to be valid, the return must be filed no later than the time prescribed by § 1.6031(a)-1(e) (including extensions thereof) for filing the return for that tax year.

Under § 301.9100-1(c) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations, the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-1(a).

Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Section 301.9100-3(a).

Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, X has established that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied. Consequently, as conditioned in the following paragraph, X is granted an extension of 60 days from the date of this letter for electing under § 754 to adjust the basis of its partnership property. Within the extension period, X must file the election with the Chief, Planning and Special Programs, Area 8, at Address for association with X’s return. A copy of this letter should be attached to the election statement.

As a condition for this late election relief, any allowable depreciation deduction for a on property held by N is to be computed using property basis unadjusted under § 743(b) because of M’s death. Any depreciation deduction subsequently allowable, beginning in b, is to be computed based on remaining useful life and using property basis as adjusted by the greater of any depreciation deduction allowed or allowable in a had the § 754 election been timely made.

Except for the specific ruling above, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of the Code. Section 301.9100-1(a) provides that the granting of an extension of time for making an election is not a determination that the taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make the election.

Under a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending the original of this letter to you and a copy to the taxpayer.
3
PLR-121808-01

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer on whose behalf it was requested.
According to § 6110(k)(3), this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,
PAUL F. KUGLER
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

enclosures: copy of this letter copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace