PLR 200145016: Partnership received 30 days to make a section 754 election

Number
200145016
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Section 754; Manner of Electing Optional Adjustment to Basis of Partnership Property
Code sections
§ 734, § 743, § 754
Ruling dated
August 6, 2001
Publicly released
November 9, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A partnership filed a tax return without a section 754 basis adjustment election after a partner died. The IRS found that it met the requirements for late election relief under the election regulations. It gave the partnership 30 days from the letter date to file a written election for association with its return. The relief was conditional: depreciation on partnership property for the earlier year had to be calculated without the section 743(b) adjustment, with the specified basis calculation applying to later depreciation.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the partnership file a late section 754 basis adjustment election?
  • Outcome: Approved, with a 30-day deadline and a depreciation condition.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 734, 743, 754; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.754-1(b), 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200145016
Release Date: 11/9/2001
Person to Contact:
Index Number: 9100.15-00
Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:2 - PLR-114986-00
Date:
Aug 6, 2001

Partnership =

A
=

D1
=

Year 1
=

Year 2
=

Chief, Planning & =
Special Programs,
Area 8

Dear
:

This responds to your letter dated July 31, 2000, and subsequent correspondence, that you submitted on Partnership’s behalf, requesting an extension of time to make an election under § 754 of the Internal Revenue Code.

On D1, A, a partner in Partnership, died. Partnership's return for the Year 1 taxable year was filed without a § 754 election.

Section 754 provides that a partnership may elect to adjust the basis of partnership property in the case of a distribution of property or in the case of a transfer of a partnership interest. The election applies with respect to all distributions of property by the partnership and to all transfers of interests in the partnership during the taxable year with respect to which such election is filed and all subsequent taxable years.

Section 1.754-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that an election under § 754 and this section to adjust the basis of partnership property under §§ 734(b) -2-

and 743(b), with respect to a distribution of property to a partner or a transfer of an interest in a partnership, shall be made in a written statement filed with the partnership return for the tax year during which the distribution or transfer occurs. For the election to be valid, the return must be filed no later than the time prescribed by § 1.6031(a)-1(e) (including extensions thereof) for filing the return for that tax year.

Under § 301.9100-1(c) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations, the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I, if the taxpayer demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting the relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election.

Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

In this case, based on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been met. Consequently, Partnership is granted an extension of time for making the § 754 election until thirty days following the date of this letter. The election should be made in a written statement filed with the Chief, Planning & Special Programs, Area 8, for association with Partnership's tax return. A copy of this letter should be attached to the statement filed with the District Director. Enclosed is a copy for that purpose.

As a condition for this late election relief, any allowable depreciation deduction for Year 1 on property held by the Partnership is to be computed using property basis unadjusted under § 743(b) because of A’s death. Any depreciation deduction subsequently allowable, beginning in Year 2, is to be computed based on the remaining useful life and using property basis as adjusted by the greater of any depreciation deduction allowed or allowable in Year 1 had the § 754 election been timely made.

Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the -3-

Code.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to Partnership.

Sincerely yours,
Paul F. Kugler
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosures: 2
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace