PLR 200144027: Investment funds allowed to revoke excise tax timing elections

Number
200144027
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Excise Tax on Undistributed Income of Regulated Investment Companies
Topics
Code sections
§ 4982
Ruling dated
August 8, 2001
Publicly released
November 2, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Twenty-two regulated investment companies had elected to use their calendar tax years rather than an October 31 period to calculate capital gain distributions for a section 4982 excise tax. They said the elections created administrative burdens and asked to revoke them. The IRS consented, finding that the request was not aimed at a tax benefit or hindsight advantage. For the transition year, the funds would use gains and losses from January through October to calculate the required distribution. They could not make the same election again for five calendar years.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the funds revoke their section 4982(e)(4)(A) elections for capital gain distribution calculations?
  • Outcome: Approved, with a five-year bar on making a new election.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 4982(a), 4982(b)(1), 4982(e)(4).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury

Number: 200144027 Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 11/2/2001
UIL: 4982.00-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:FIP:Br.3/PLR-130169-01
Date:
August 8, 2001

Legend:

Fund 1 =

Fund 2 =

Fund 3 =

Fund 4 =

Fund 5 =

Fund 6 =

Fund 7 =

Fund 8 =

Fund 9 =

Fund 10 =

Fund 11 =

Fund 12 =

Fund 13 =

Fund 14 =

Fund 15 =

Fund 16 =
PLR-130169-01
2

Fund 17 =

Fund 18 =

Fund 19 =

Fund 20 =

Fund 21 =

Fund 22 =

Year A =

Year B =

Year C =

Year D =

Year E =

Year F =

Year G =

Year H =

Dear
:

This ruling responds to a letter dated May 16, 2001, submitted on behalf of Funds 1 through 22 (collectively referred to as the “Funds”) by their authorized representatives. Each Fund requests consent to revoke, for tax Year F and subsequent calendar years, a previous election made by that Fund under section 4892(e)(4)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code. Additionally, the Funds request that the calculation of each of their required distributions of capital gain net income under section 4982(b)(1) and (e)(2) for the calendar year ending December 31, Year F, be determined on the basis of capital gains and losses realized and recognized during the ten-month period from January 1, Year F, through October 31, Year F.

The Funds are diversified, open-ended management investment companies that have registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. Section 80a-1 et seq. Each Fund has elected and intends to continue to qualify for treatment as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under Subchapter M of the Code. The Funds are primarily designed to serve as an investment vehicle for individual, partnership, and corporate retirement plans and other
PLR-130169-01
3

entities exempt from federal income taxation, although shares in each Fund may be purchased by other investors.

The Funds use an accrual method of accounting for tax and financial accounting purposes and use a calendar year for tax purposes. Pursuant to section 4982(e)(4)(A), each of the Funds elected to use its tax year ending on December 31 in lieu of the 1- year period ending on October 31, for purposes of calculating the required distribution under sections 4982(b)(1)(B) and 4982(e)(2). Funds 1 - 9 and 11 - 15 made their respective elections in Year D, Funds 10 and 18 in Year E, Fund 16 in Year C, Funds 17, 19, and 22 in Year A and Funds 20 and 21 in Year B.

At the time the Funds originally made their respective elections, each believed that the election under section 4982 would relieve the administrative burdens associated with dual calculations of capital gains and losses under the excise tax and Subchapter M provisions of the Code. However, the Funds’ experience has been that the section 4982(e)(4)(A) election has created additional administrative complexities primarily due to time constraints in declaring required excise tax distributions and the need for Funds’ accounting group to perform capital gain net income calculations at a different time than for other funds not subject to a section 4982(e)(4)(A) election.

Moreover, the promulgation of regulations coordinating the excise tax and Subchapter M provisions has greatly reduced the administrative burden of having a tax year different from the period used for determining the required distributions under section 4982. Accordingly, the computation of capital gain net income by the Funds on the last business day of their tax year pursuant to their section 4982(e)(4)(A) elections has become administratively impracticable, and the Funds seek consent to revoke their elections to use the taxable year (the calendar year) for purposes of sections 4982(b)(1)(B) and 4982(e)(2).

Permitting the Funds to revoke their section 4982(e)(4)(A) elections and compute capital gain net income for the tax year on October 31, rather than December 31, would significantly lessen the administrative burden of computing capital gain net income in an accurate and timely manner. Additionally, the Funds represent that:

1. The desire to revoke their section 4982(e)(4)(A) elections is due to administrative and non-tax related financial burdens caused by the elections.

2. They are not seeking to revoke their elections for the purpose of preserving or securing a tax benefit.

3. They will neither benefit through hindsight nor prejudice the interests of the government as a result of being permitted to revoke their elections.

4. They will not make a subsequent election under section 4982(e)(4)(A) for five (5) calendar years following the year of the grant of revocation.
PLR-130169-01
4

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 4982(a), which was enacted as part of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and is effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 1986, imposes an excise tax on every RIC for each calendar year equal to 4 percent of the excess (if any) of the “required distribution” over the “distributed amount,” for the calendar year.

Section 4982(b)(1) defines the term “required distribution” to mean, with respect to any calendar year, the sum of 98 percent of the RIC’s ordinary income for such calendar year, plus 98 percent of its capital gain net income for the 1-year period ending on October 31 of such calendar year.

Section 4982(e)(4)(A) provides that if the tax year of a RIC ends with the month of November or December, the RIC may elect to have its capital gain net income for its tax year applied in lieu of the 1-year period ending on October 31 of the calendar year for purposes of satisfying the required distribution defined in section 4982(b)(1). Section 4982(e)(4)(B) provides that, once made, such election may be revoked only with the consent of the Secretary.

Based upon the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude that each Fund’s desire to revoke its election under section 4982(e)(4)(A) of the Code is because of administrative burdens and not because of any federal tax- related financial burden caused by the election. The Funds do not seek to revoke their elections for the purpose of preserving or securing a federal tax benefit. Additionally, the Funds will neither benefit through hindsight nor prejudice the interest of the government as a result of being permitted to revoke their elections.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, based upon the representations made and pursuant to section 4982(e)(4)(B), the Secretary consents to the revocation of the elections made by the Funds under section 4982(e)(4)(A), effective for calendar Year F and subsequent years. In addition, in calculating the “required distribution” for calendar Year F, for purposes of section 4982(b)(1) and (e), the capital gain net income of the Funds will be determined on the basis of the capital gains and losses taken into account during the 10-month period from January 1, Year F, through October 31, Year F. See section 4982(e)(5) for the effect of this ruling on the treatment of any foreign currency gains or losses.

As a condition to the Secretary’s consent to the revocation pursuant to section 4982(e)(4)(B), none of the Funds may make a subsequent election under section 4982(e)(4)(A) for a period of five (5) calendar years following the year to which the grant of revocation applies (i.e., Year G through Year H).

Except as specifically ruled upon above, no opinion is expressed or implied as to any other federal excise or income tax consequences.
PLR-130169-01
5

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayers requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

It is important that a copy of this letter be attached to the federal income and excise tax return filed by each of the Funds for the first year to which this ruling applies.

Sincerely yours,
Alice M. Bennett
Chief, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Financial Institutions & Products)

Enclosure: Copy of this letter
Copy for section 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace