PLR 200140074: Taxpayer receives time to file dual consolidated loss documents
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A corporate taxpayer used losses of foreign hybrid entities in its U.S. consolidated return but missed required elections, agreements, and annual certifications for dual consolidated losses. It said it relied on its tax staff and accounting firm to file the documents, and that the losses had not been used to offset foreign taxable income. The IRS found the taxpayer met the good faith and government interest standards for discretionary filing relief under the § 301.9100 regulations. It gave the taxpayer 30 days from the letter to file the omitted documents. The IRS expressly did not decide whether the taxpayer otherwise qualified to file them.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the taxpayer file omitted dual consolidated loss elections and certifications after their deadlines?
- Outcome: Approved: a 30 day extension, without a ruling on underlying eligibility.
- Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1503-2(g)(2), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Number: 200140074
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 10/5/2001
Index Number: 9100.22-00
Person to Contact:
1503.04-04
Telephone Number:
In re: Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:PLR-120457-00
Date:
July 11, 2001
LEGEND
Taxpayer
=
Entities
=
Fiscal tax year ended on date =
A, B, C
Fiscal year A, B, C
=
Individuals A, B, C
=
CPA Firm
=
Dear:
This replies to a letter dated October 11, 2000, in which Taxpayer requests an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 as follows (i) to file the elections, agreements and certifications required under § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) for the fiscal tax year ended on date A (related to the dual consolidated losses occurring in fiscal year A); (ii) to file the annual certifications required under § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi) for the fiscal tax year ended on date B (related to the fiscal year A dual consolidated losses); and (iii) to file annual certifications for the fiscal tax year ended on date C (related to the fiscal years A and B dual consolidated losses). The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.
The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process.
2
In re: PLR-120457-00
The facts state that all Entities are hybrid entity separate units as described in
§ 1.1503-2(c)(4); that, therefore, these Entities are dual resident corporations as described in § 1.1503-2(c)(2); and that the losses incurred by these Entities are dual consolidated losses under § 1.1503-2(c)(5).
All Entities incurred net operating losses for the fiscal tax year ended on date A. Taxpayer included the foreign losses in calculating its U.S. consolidated taxable income for fiscal year A. However, the dual consolidated loss elections, agreements and certifications required to be filed under § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) were inadvertently omitted. None of these foreign losses were used to offset taxable income in a foreign jurisdiction.
In fiscal year B, Entities generated additional losses. The elections, agreements and certifications related to the fiscal year B dual consolidated losses were properly included in Taxpayer’s federal tax return for fiscal year B. However, the required annual certifications related to the fiscal year A dual consolidated losses were not included in the federal tax return for fiscal year B.
In fiscal year C. two of the Entities generated additional losses. The elections, agreements, and certifications related to the dual consolidated losses for fiscal year C were properly included in Taxpayer’s federal tax return for fiscal year C. However, the required annual certifications related to the dual consolidated losses for fiscal years A and B were not included in the federal tax return for fiscal year C.
Individual A is the Tax Director of Taxpayer. Individual B is a tax partner with CPA Firm, and Individual C is a tax manager with CPA Firm. The affidavits of these Individuals describe the circumstances surrounding the failure to timely file the agreements and annual certifications, and establish that Taxpayer relied upon these Individuals to timely file the agreements and annual certifications.
The Internal Revenue Service has not discovered Taxpayer’s failure to timely file the agreements and annual certifications
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in § 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
§ 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer 3
In re: PLR-120457-00
acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
In the present situation, § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) fixes the time to file the election, agreement, and certification; and § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi) fixes the time to file the annual certification. Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under
§ 301.9100–1(c) to grant Taxpayer an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the standards set forth in § 301.9100-3(a).
Based on the facts and circumstances of this case, we conclude that Taxpayer satisfies § 301.9100-3(a). Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time until 30 days from the date of this ruling letter (i) to file the elections, agreements and certifications required under § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) for the fiscal tax year ended on date A (related to the dual consolidated losses occurring in fiscal year A); (ii) to file the annual certifications required under § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi) for the fiscal tax year ended on date B (related to the fiscal year A dual consolidated losses); and (iii) to file annual certifications for the fiscal tax year ended on date C (related to the fiscal years A and B dual consolidated losses)
The granting of an extension of time to file the agreements and annual certifications is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to file the agreements and annual certifications. § 301.9100-1(a).
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
A copy of this ruling letter should be associated with the agreements and annual certifications.
No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented.
Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling letter is being furnished to Taxpayer and the other authorized representative.
Sincerely,
/s/ Allen Goldstein
Reviewer
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (International)
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace