PLR 200139003: Extension granted for personal holding company consent dividends

Number
200139003
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Extension of Time for Making Certain Elections
Code sections
§ 542, § 565
Ruling dated
June 18, 2001
Publicly released
September 28, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A personal holding company missed the elections needed to treat certain amounts as consent dividends under § 565(a). It had relied on its outside accounting firm to identify and prepare appropriate elections, but the firm had not advised it of this election. The IRS found that the requirements for discretionary filing relief were met. It gave the company 30 days from the letter to file Forms 972 and 973 for the 1997 and 1998 tax years and directed it to send copies to the specified IRS official.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the company file its consent dividend forms after the original deadline?
  • Outcome: Approved: Forms 972 and 973 could be filed within 30 days of the letter.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 542(a), 565(a); Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200139003
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 9/28/2001
Index Number: 9100.00-00
Person to Contact:
PLR-108080-01/CC:PSI:B5
Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
Date:
June 18, 2001

Legend

Corp 1
=

State A
=

b
=

Firm A
=

SB/SE Official
=

This is response to a request for rulings dated November 29, 2000, submitted by your authorized representative requesting relief under 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make the consent dividend election under § 565(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Corp A was incorporated in State A on b. Corp A is currently invested primarily in rental properties, municipal bonds and stocks. The majority of the rentals consist of real property leased to commercial businesses.

According to the information submitted, during the tax years ending September 30, 1998 and September 30, 1999, Corp A was a personal holding company as defined under § 542(a) of the Code. Corp A had personal holding company income of $ and $ for the 1997 and 1998 tax years, respectively and paid dividends
in the amount of for the 1997 tax year and $ for the 1998 tax year.
Corp A had undistributed personal holding company income of $
and $
for the 1997 and 1998 tax years, respectively.

Corp A did not have a tax director or any other tax professional on its staff. Firm A had been providing accounting and tax services since 1991 and had knowledge of all the relevant facts regarding Corp A and its shareholders. Firm A was required by 2

contract to “provide ... consultation on accounting and tax matters as you may require during the year and at year end.” Corp A and its shareholders relied on Firm A to analyze all aspects of their tax situation, to make appropriate recommendations, to carry out the implementation of those recommendations, to determine what elections it was required or advisable to file, to supervise the preparation and presentation of all such elections, and to ensure that the appropriate documents were completed.

Firm A prepared compiled financial statements and income tax returns for Corp A and its shareholders for the 1997 and 1998 tax years. Firm A affirms by affidavit that it did not discuss the availability or recommend the consent dividend election orally or in written format with any of the corporate officers or shareholders of Corp A during the course of the preparation of the compiled financial statements, the preparation of the income tax returns for Corp A and shareholders, or in any other meetings with the corporate officers or the shareholders of Corp A during the 1997 and 1998 tax years.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election.

Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term "regulatory election" as including an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than 6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3(a) will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

In this case, good cause has been shown and the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been met. Accordingly, based on the facts submitted and the representations made, Corp A is granted an extension of time to file Forms 972 and 973 for the 1997 and 1998 tax years until or before 30 days from the date of this letter. In addition, a copy of this letter along with copies of the Forms should be sent to the SB/SE Official. A copy of this letter is enclosed for this purpose.

No opinion is expressed or implied regarding the application of any other provisions of the Code or regulations.
3

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the power of attorney on file, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized legal representative.

Sincerely yours,
PAUL F. KUGLER
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
Enclosures:
6110 copy
Copy of Letter

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace