PLR 200138024: Revised spin-off steps preserve earlier rulings

Number
200138024
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Distribution of Stock and Securities of a Controlled Corporation
Code sections
§ 355, § 358
Ruling dated
June 25, 2001
Publicly released
September 21, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A company changed several steps of a planned distribution of a subsidiary's stock after receiving an earlier ruling. The changes included exchanging preferred shares, revising asset transfers, and planning to dispose of two other subsidiaries instead of offering and distributing their shares. The IRS replaced two prior rulings to confirm that shareholders would recognize no gain or loss on the distribution and would allocate their existing stock basis between the two companies' shares. It said the other earlier rulings remained in force despite the changes. The IRS did not rule on the tax treatment of disposing of the two other subsidiaries.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Would revised transaction steps change the earlier spin-off rulings?
  • Outcome: Approved: revised shareholder nonrecognition and basis rulings; other earlier rulings retained effect.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 355(a)(1), 355(b), 358.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200138024
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 9/21/2001
Index Number: 0355.00-00
Person to Contact:
Richard K. Passales (50-05544)
Telephone Number:
(202)-622-7530
Refer Reply To:
CC:CORP:B04 PLR-127906-01
Date:
June 25, 2001

Date O
=

Dear

This responds to your May 18, 2001 request that we supplement our letter ruling dated March 1, 2001 (PLR-118279-00) (the "Prior Letter Ruling"). Capitalized terms not defined herein have the meanings assigned them in the Prior Letter Ruling.

The Prior Letter Ruling addresses certain federal income tax consequences of a proposed initial public offering of Controlled stock (the “Offering”), followed by the distribution by Distributing of its Controlled stock (the “Distribution”), and certain related transactions. The Offering was completed on Date O. The Distribution has not yet been undertaken. The taxpayer proposes to modify the Proposed Transaction described in the Prior Letter Ruling in the following manner:

Before the Distribution, the Distributing preferred stock held by Investor D (the “Old Preferred”) will be exchanged for new Distributing preferred stock (the “New Preferred”) pursuant to an Exchange Agreement. The New Preferred will have the same terms as the Old Preferred, with the following exceptions: (i) Distributing will not make the Cash Distribution to Investor D that is described in step (vi) of the Proposed Transaction and (ii) the amount of the reduction in the liquidation preference of Investor D’s Old Preferred will be the value of the Controlled stock distributed on the New Preferred as of the redemption date (or, if earlier, the date Distributing is liquidated) rather than as of the Distribution date. Since Distributing will not make the Cash Distribution, the references to the Cash Distribution in the Legend and Caveats of the Prior Letter Ruling are deleted.

Additionally, Distributing no longer intends to contribute substantially all of its non-operating assets (other than the Sub 1, Sub 2, Sub 3, and Controlled stock) to Sub 2 and Controlled, and then contribute the Sub 1 and Sub 3 stock to Sub 2, as described in step (ii) of the Proposed Transaction. Instead, Distributing will contribute certain non- operating assets to Controlled in exchange for additional Controlled stock and cause Sub 1 to merge into Distributing. After the merger of Sub 1 into Distributing, Distributing will conduct directly Sub 1's share of the integrated activities of Business C.
PLR-127906-01
2

Also, Distributing no longer intends to do either (i) an initial public offering of Sub 2 stock, followed by a distribution of Distributing’s Sub 2 stock to its shareholders, or (ii) an initial public offering of Sub 3 stock, followed by a distribution of Distributing's Sub 3 stock to its shareholders. Instead, Distributing will sell or dispose of the stock or assets of these subsidiaries or liquidate them. As a result, clause (v) of the Caveats of the Prior Letter Ruling is deleted.

In response to these changes, Representations (d) and (g) are deleted from the Prior Letter Ruling, and Representations (e1), (f), and (l) are replaced with the following representations:

(e1) The gross assets of the business relied upon by Distributing to satisfy the active trade or business test of § 355(b) will have a fair market value equal to or greater than five percent of the total fair market value of the gross assets of Distributing immediately after the Distribution.

(f) Following the Distribution, Controlled and Distributing each will continue, independently and with its separate employees, the active conduct of its share of the integrated activities of Business C.

(l) There is no plan or intention to liquidate either Distributing or Controlled, to merge either corporation with any other corporation, or to sell or otherwise dispose of the assets of either corporation after the transaction, except in the ordinary course of business and except that Distributing may sell or otherwise dispose of Sub 2 or Sub 3 or both (including through distributions to Distributing’s shareholders). Distributing further represents that its continued conduct of a significant active trade or business under § 355(b) would be unaffected by any disposition of the stock or the assets of Sub 2 or Sub 3 or both. See representations (e1) and (f).

As a result of the changes described above, rulings (7) and (8) of the Prior Letter Ruling are deleted and replaced with the following rulings:

(7) No gain or loss will be recognized by (and no amount will otherwise be included in the income of) Distributing’s shareholders on the Distribution (§ 355(a)(1)).

(8) The aggregate basis of the Distributing stock and the Controlled stock in the hands of each Distributing shareholder after the Distribution will equal the basis of the Distributing stock held by the shareholder immediately before the Distribution. (§§ 358(a)(1) and 358(c)). The aggregate basis will be allocated between the Distributing stock and Controlled stock in proportion to the fair market value of each immediately after the Distribution in accordance with § 1.358-2(a)(2) (§ 358(b)(2)).

In addition, the following ruling is issued:
PLR-127906-01
3

Except as described above regarding rulings (7) and (8) of the Prior Letter Ruling, the additional information and representations contained in this supplemental ruling will not adversely affect the Prior Letter Ruling, and the Prior Letter Ruling retains full force and effect.

We express no opinion about the tax treatment of the Proposed Transaction under any other provision of the Code or regulations or the tax treatment of any condition existing at the time of, or effect resulting from, the Proposed Transaction that is not specifically covered by the above rulings. In particular, no opinion is expressed regarding the tax treatment of the sale or other disposition of Sub 2 or Sub 3 or both described above in representation (l).

This supplemental letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it.
Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Each taxpayer involved in the Proposed Transaction should attach a copy of this letter, along with a copy of the Prior Letter Ruling, to the taxpayer’s federal income tax return for the taxable year in which the Proposed Transaction is completed.

Under a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to each of your authorized representatives.

Sincerely,
Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)
By: Wayne T. Murray
Senior Technician/Reviewer
Branch 4

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace