PLR 200138011: Extensions granted for three related QSub elections

Number
200138011
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Extension of Time for Making Certain Elections
Code sections
§ 1361
Ruling dated
June 20, 2001
Publicly released
September 21, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An S corporation intended to treat two directly owned subsidiaries and one subsidiary owned through them as qualified subchapter S subsidiaries (QSubs). It missed the elections for the first two, then discovered that this prevented it from electing QSub status for the third. The IRS found that the requirements for discretionary relief were met. It gave the parent 60 days to file Forms 8869 for all three subsidiaries, using the respective intended effective dates stated in the letter. The IRS did not decide whether the parent was a valid S corporation or the subsidiaries were valid QSubs.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the parent make late QSub elections for two direct subsidiaries and a lower-tier subsidiary?
  • Outcome: Approved: all three elections could be filed within 60 days.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1361(b)(3)(B); Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200138011
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 9/21/2001
Index Number: 9100.00-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:P&SI:1-PLR-111744-01
Date:
June 20, 2001

X
=

W
=

Y
=

Z
=

Date 1 =

Date 2 =

Date 3 =

:

This letter responds to a letter dated December 8, 2000, written on behalf of X, requesting a ruling that X be granted an extension of time in which to elect to treat its first tier subsidiaries, W and Y, and its second tier subsidiary, Z, as qualified subchapter S subsidiaries (QSubs).

FACTS

According to the information submitted, X was formed on Date 1. On the same date X incorporated its wholly owned subsidiary W. On Date 2, the shareholders of Y, a corporation, contributed their shares in Y to X in exchange for X stock. X elected to be treated as an S corporation effective Date 2. From the date on which X elected to be treated as an S corporation X intended to have W and Y treated as QSubs; however X inadvertently failed to timely file QSub elections for W and Y.
2
PLR-111744-01

On Date 3 Y incorporated Z. From the date of incorporation of Z, X intended to treat Z as a QSub. However, in the course of preparing to file a QSub election for Z, X discovered that because X had not filed a QSub election for Y, it was not possible for X to file a QSub election for Z.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1361(b)(3)(B) defines the term “qualified subchapter S subsidiary” as a domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation as defined in section 1361(b)(2), if (1) an S corporation holds 100 percent of the stock of the corporation, and (2) that S corporation elects to treat the subsidiary as a QSub. The election is made by filing Form 8869.

Under section 301.9100-1(c) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations, the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code except subtitles E, G, H and I, if the taxpayer demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting the relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term “regulatory election” as including an election whose deadline is prescribed by a notice published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section 310.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections, but does not apply to QSub elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do not meet the requirements of section 301.9100-2. Requests for relief under section 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

CONCLUSIONS

Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, the requirements of sections 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. As a result, X is granted an extension of time of sixty (60) days from the date of this letter to make an election to treat its wholly owned subsidiaries W and Y as QSubs effective Date 2. In addition, X is granted an extension of time of sixty (60) days from the date of this letter to make an election to treat Y’s wholly owned subsidiary Z as a QSub effective Date 3. X should submit the properly completed Forms 8869 to the relevant service center. A copy of this letter should be attached to each of the Forms 8869 filed with the service center.
3
PLR-111744-01

Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed concerning whether X is a valid S corporation or whether its subsidiaries W, Y, and Z are valid QSubs.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to the power of attorney on file with this office a copy of this letter is being sent to the taxpayer.

Sincerely yours,
Paul F. Kugler
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for section 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace