CCA 200137045: Anonymous taxpayer must identify herself before closing agreement

Number
200137045
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Anonymous Closing Agreement
Topics
Ruling dated
July 2, 2001
Publicly released
September 14, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel reviewed a draft closing agreement submitted for an unidentified taxpayer. It found the draft acceptable in principle, but said the IRS should sign only after the taxpayer disclosed her identity and the responsible office confirmed that she was not under examination or notified of one. Counsel proposed language calling for payment of tax and interest within 90 days of signing. It also proposed requiring unredacted nonresident income tax returns and supporting schedules for three years. The memorandum treated those steps as necessary to resolve the taxpayer's past liabilities and support future compliance.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the IRS enter into the proposed closing agreement while the taxpayer remained anonymous?
  • Outcome: Advice: the draft was acceptable in principle, but the taxpayer had to identify herself and meet stated conditions before signing.
  • Key authorities: No Code section is cited in the memorandum.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
I N T E R N AL R E V E N U E S E R V I C E WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
July 2, 2001
OFFICE OF
CHIEF COUNSEL

Number: 200137045
CC:INTL:Br1:NChowdhry
Release Date: 9/14/2001
WTA-N-128318-01
UIL: 9999.98-00

MEMORANDUM FOR ROB D. STANCHIK
Supervisory Attorney, Group 1116
S:C:15:T1:1114/1116

FROM: W. Ed Williams
Senior Technical Reviewer, Branch 1
CC:INTL:1

SUBJECT: Anonymous Closing Agreement

Pursuant to your request, we have reviewed the closing agreement that was prepared by taxpayer’s counsel and that you forwarded to our office on May 9, 2001.

In our view, the draft closing agreement is acceptable as an agreement in principal.
However, it should be entered into on behalf of the Commissioner only after the taxpayer reveals her identity. As you know, the Internal Revenue Service does not enter into closing agreements with anonymous taxpayers. In addition, prior to signing the closing agreement, your office should confirm that the taxpayer is not presently under examination and has not been notified of the initiation of any such examination.

We suggest that the following be added to the closing agreement on page 1, after the final WHEREAS:

WHEREAS, in recognition of taxpayer’s voluntary disclosure to the IRS of the above facts and circumstances, taxpayer’s full and immediate payment of the U.S. income taxes due, and the IRS policy of determining the extent of retroactive compliance to be required based on all the facts and circumstances and in the best interest of the U.S. Government from the standpoint of reasonableness, salutary effect on compliance, and prudent deployment of resources, the parties desire to enter into this Agreement.

We suggest that the first full sentence in the first full paragraph on page 3 of the Agreement be revised as follows:
2
WTA-N-128318-01

The parties agree that the tax liability of the taxpayer required to be paid pursuant to this agreement, plus statutory interest, shall be paid and remitted to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue within ninety (90) days from the signing of this Agreement.

Finally, we suggest that the following be added as a paragraph directly before the paragraph above:

Upon execution of this Agreement for the Commissioner, the taxpayer shall file unredacted Nonresident Alien Individual Income Tax Returns, Forms 1040 NR, for the years 1997, 1998, and 1999, with all necessary supporting schedules and copies of unredacted Forms K-1 for these years. The IRS will utilize this information, and such other supporting documentation as it may ask the taxpayer to provide, to set forth any required adjustments to the taxpayer’s income tax liabilities for the years 1997, 1998, and 1999.

It is our view that the draft closing agreement provides a basis for resolving the outstanding issues and fully protects the interests of the Internal Revenue Service. The closing agreement also brings a taxpayer back into the federal tax system and reasonably ensures future compliance.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please do not hesitate to call me at 622-3268, or Nina Chowdhry at 622-4691.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace