PLR 200136020: Extension granted to file dual consolidated loss agreements for seven years

Number
200136020
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Other; Dual Resident Corporation
Code sections
§ 1503
Ruling dated
June 11, 2001
Publicly released
September 7, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporate group's foreign branch incurred dual consolidated losses in seven tax years. A later corporate transaction triggered a filing requirement for agreements relating to those losses, but the group filed only a statement of its intent to enter a closing agreement after receiving professional advice. The IRS found that the group met the standards for regulatory election relief. It gave the group 30 days from the letter to file the required agreements for the seven years. The extension addressed the deadline only and did not decide whether the group was otherwise eligible to file them.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the group file the required dual consolidated loss agreements after the deadline for a triggering year?
  • Outcome: Approved: a 30-day extension to file the agreements for seven tax years.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1503-2(g)(2), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200136020
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 9/7/2001
Index Number: 9100.22-00
Person to Contact:
1503.04-04
Telephone Number:
In re: Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:PLR-107720-01
Date:
June 11, 2001

LEGEND

Taxpayer
=

Corporation A
=

Corporation B
=

Branch
=

Seven tax years ended on =
the dates enumerated

Tax Year One
=

Individuals A and B
=

CPA Firm
=

Country Y
=

Months A and B of Year X =

Dear :

This replies to a letter dated February 1, 2001, in which Taxpayer requests an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to file the agreement under
§ 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) as required by § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(iv)(B)(2)(iii) for the seven tax years ended on the dates enumerated for the taxable year in which the event described in
§ 1.1503-2(g)(2)(iv)(B)(1) occurred. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material

2
In re: PLR-107720-01

submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process.

From its incorporation in Tax Year One, Corporation A owned all of the shares of Corporation B, which conducted business in Country Y through Branch. Branch sustained losses for the seven tax years ended on the dates enumerated. These losses were not and have not been used to offset the income of any other persons under the laws of Country Y or any other foreign country.

As a result of transactions relating to Corporation A during the months of A and B in Year X, Taxpayer became the common parent of a new affiliated group of corporations that included Corporation A and Corporation B. The transaction constituted a triggering event as described in §1.1503-2A(c)(3)(iii)(B)(2) and §1.1503- 2(g)(2)(iii)(A)(2).

Individual A is the tax director for Taxpayer, and was unsure of the procedure involved in entering into a closing agreement with the Internal Revenue Service as provided under § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(iv)(B)(2)(i) so that the transaction would not constitute a triggering event. Individual A consulted with Individual B, an international tax partner with CPA Firm. On the advice of Individual B, Taxpayer filed a statement evidencing its intention to enter into a closing agreement. The IRS after reviewing the closing agreement advised Taxpayer that it failed to file the agreement under § 1.1503- 2(g)(2)(i) as required by § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(iv)(B)(2)(iii). However, Taxpayer was not advised by Individual B to file the agreement under § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i).

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in § 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
§ 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(iv)(B)(2)(iii) fixes the time to file the agreement under § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100–1(c) to grant Taxpayer an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the standards set forth in § 301.9100-3(a).

3
In re: PLR-107720-01

Based on the facts and circumstances of this case, we conclude that Taxpayer satisfies § 301.9100-3(a). Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time until 30 days from the date of this ruling letter to file the agreement under
§ 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) as required by § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(iv)(B)(2)(iii) for the seven tax years ended on the dates enumerated for the taxable year in which the event described in
§ 1.1503-2(g)(2)(iv)(B)(1) occurred. The granting of an extension of time to file the agreement is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to file the agreement. § 301.9100-1(a).

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

No ruling is expressed regarding the application of any section of the Code or regulations other than the above rulings which you have specifically requested. A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the agreement.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling letter is being furnished to Taxpayer and the other authorized representative.

Sincerely,

/s/ Allen Goldstein
Allen Goldstein
Reviewer
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (International)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace