CCA 200135025: Lower failure-to-pay rate starts when installment agreement is accepted

Number
200135025
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Failure to File Tax Returns or Pay Tax (Addition v. No Addition to Tax)
Code sections
§ 6651, § 6159
Ruling dated
July 24, 2001
Publicly released
August 31, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS asked whether a mailed application for an installment agreement could be treated as accepted on the day it arrived so the taxpayer would receive a lower failure-to-pay addition to tax sooner. Chief Counsel advised that the reduced rate under § 6651(h) applies only during a month when an installment agreement is in effect. Receiving a proposal is not acceptance; an IRS official must take an affirmative action to accept it, even for an agreement covered by the statutory guaranteed-agreement rules. Therefore the IRS cannot start the reduced rate on the mailing or receipt date merely because the taxpayer applied by correspondence.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the IRS treat receipt of a mailed installment agreement proposal as acceptance for the reduced failure-to-pay rate?
  • Outcome: Advice given: no, the rate changes only after the agreement is accepted and in effect.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6651(h), 6159.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
I N T E R N AL R E V E N U E S E R V I C E WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

OFFICE OF
CHIEF COUNSEL
July 24, 2001

Number: 200135025
CC:PA:APJP:MWMendel
Release Date: 8/31/2001
GL-112612-01
UILC: 6651.00-00

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE SERVICE CENTER ADVICE

MEMORANDUM FOR Associate Area Counsel (SB/SE), Area 1, Boston

FROM: Assistant Chief Counsel (Administrative Provisions & Judicial
Practice) CC:PA:APJP

SUBJECT: Failure to Pay Additional Tax

This memorandum is in response to your request for Significant Service Center Advice dated April 24, 2001, in connection with a question posed by the Collection Branch of the Andover Service Center. This document is not to be used or cited as precedent.

ISSUE

Whether the Service can treat an installment agreement as accepted on the date it receives the written application for an installment agreement for purposes of reducing the failure to pay addition to tax rate imposed pursuant to section 6651(h)?

CONCLUSION

The Service is not authorized to treat the receipt date of a proposed installment agreement as the acceptance date for purposes of reducing the failure to pay addition to tax rate imposed pursuant to section 6651(h).

FACTS

Pursuant to the Internal Revenue Manual 5.14.2.2, streamlined installment agreements may be accepted by Service employees without managerial approval when the unpaid balance of assessments is $25,000.00 or less and the tax liability will be paid in full within sixty months or prior to the expiration of the collection statute expiration date, whichever comes first. The agreements may be obtained in person, by telephone or by correspondence. See I.R.M. 5.14.2.2 (6).

2
GL-112612-01

It is our understanding that when an agreement is secured by telephone and meets the streamline requirements authorized Service personnel may accept the agreement immediately. Thus, the Service immediately places into effect the reduced failure to pay penalty authorized under section 6651(h). When a taxpayer proposes an installment agreement by correspondence, however, the Service may not accept the agreement for several weeks. Only upon acceptance does the Service apply the reduced penalty rate. As a result, taxpayers who obtain their installment agreement approval by telephone have the reduced penalty rate sooner than taxpayers who apply for installment agreements in writing.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 6651(a)(2) provides that in the case of failure ”to pay the amount shown as tax on any return specified in paragraph (1) on or before the date prescribed for payment of such tax (determined with regard to any extension of time for payment) unless it is shown that such failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, there shall be added to the amount shown as tax on such return 0.5 percent of the amount of such tax if the failure is not for more than 1 month, with an additional 0.5 percent for each additional month or fraction thereof during which such failure continues, not exceeding 25 percent in the aggregate.” However, Section 6651(h) provides some relief by limiting the penalty if an installment agreement is in effect. Specifically, section 6651(h) provides “[i]n the case of an individual who files a return of tax on or before the due date for the return (including extensions), paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (a) shall each be applied by substituting ‘0.25' for ‘.05' each place it appears for the purposes of determining the addition to tax for any month during which an installment agreement under Section 6159 is in effect for the payment of such tax.”

Section 6159 authorizes the Secretary to enter into written installment agreements with any taxpayer to satisfy that taxpayer’s tax liability. With the exception of installment agreements entered into under section 6159(c), the Service has discretion to reject or accept a proposed installment agreement. See Treas. Reg.
§ 301.6159-1(b)(1)(i); Kitchen Cabinets, Inc. v. United States, 2001-1 U.S.T.C.
¶50,287 (N.D. Tex 2001). Under section 6159(c), the Secretary is required to enter into an installment agreement where the taxpayer will pay his tax liability in full within three years if (a) the liability does not exceed $10,000 and (b) the taxpayer, during the preceding five years, has not failed to file a return, failed to pay the tax due, or entered into an installment agreement. See I.R.C. § 6159(c)(2)(a)-(c). In addition, however, the Secretary must determine that the taxpayer is unable to pay the liability when due. See I.R.C. § 6159(c)(3). Thus, even an installment agreement guaranteed by section 6159(c) requires the Secretary to make an

3
GL-112612-01

affirmative determination. Accordingly, no installment agreement can be in effect until the Service performs an affirmative act to accept the agreement
.
Because the mere receipt of a proposed installment agreement does not involve any affirmative act by the Service, an installment agreement is not accepted, or in effect, on the date of receipt. The plain language of section 6651(h) does not permit the Service to reduce the penalty rate until an installment agreement is in effect. Thus, the Service cannot apply the reduced penalty rate under section 6651(h) as of the date a taxpayer mails, or the date the Service receives, an installment agreement proposal from a taxpayer who submits an installment agreement proposal by mail.

If you have any questions regarding this response, please contact Branch 2 of Administrative Provisions & Judicial Practice.

CURTIS G. WILSON
By:Ashton P. Trice
Senior Technician Reviewer
APJP, Branch 2

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace