PLR 200134028: Pension plan minimum funding waiver denied

Number
200134028
Outcome
Denied
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Minimum Funding Waiver
Code sections
§ 412, § 4971
Ruling dated
May 29, 2001
Publicly released
August 24, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A company requested a waiver of the minimum funding standard for its defined benefit pension plan for the 2000 plan year. The IRS denied the request because the company's controlled group did not show temporary substantial business hardship. The group had a profit greater than twice the requested waiver, net worth greater than 20 times the waiver, and cash exceeding three times the waiver. Under § 412 and the corresponding ERISA rule, the IRS assessed hardship for both the employer and its controlled group. The IRS said the company still had to meet the funding requirement by September 15, 2001, or the plan would incur a funding deficiency subject to § 4971 excise taxes.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the plan receive a waiver of its 2000 minimum funding standard because of temporary substantial business hardship?
  • Outcome: Denied; the controlled group's finances did not support the claimed hardship.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 412(d)(5), 4971; ERISA §§ 302, 303(d)(2).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Significant-Index No. 0412.06-00
Washington, DC 20224
200134028

Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply to: T:EP:RA:1:A1

Date: MAY 29 2001
In re:

This letter constitutes notice that with respect to the above-named defined benefit pension plan, your request for a waiver of the minimum funding standard for the plan year ended December 31, 2000 has been denied.

Thus, the minimum funding standard under § 412 of the Internal Revenue Code and § 302 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) will apply to the plan for the plan year ended December 31, 2000. The company has until September 15, 2001 to satisfy the minimum funding requirement for the 2000 plan year. Unless such requirement is met, the plan will have an accumulated funding deficiency for the 2000 plan year upon which the excise taxes under Code § 4971 will apply.

The information furnished indicates that the controlled group of which the company is a member does not have a temporary substantial business hardship. For the nine-month period ended October 31, 2000, the controlled group had a profit of more than double the amount of the requested waiver. In addition, the controlled group had net worth equal to more than 20 times the amount of the requested waiver. Finally, the controlled group had cash-on-hand of more than three times the amount of the requested waiver. Also, as of January 1, 2000, the value of the plan’s assets was equal to only 77% of the plan's current liability.

The company was informed of our tentative denial and was offered a conference of right. A telephone conference was held on April 26, 2000. At the conference we reiterated our position that Code § 412(d)(5) and ERISA § 303(d)(2) require that when an employer is part of a controlled group, the determination of whether there is temporary substantial business hardship must be made with respect to the employer and to the controlled group of which the employer is a member. Since the conference, the company has offered no addition information regarding the request. Accordingly, our tentative denial is now final.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Code § 6110(k)(3) provides that others may not use it as precedent.

172

-2- 200134028

We have sent a copy of this letter to the enrolled actuary for the plan pursuant to Form 2848 (Power of Attorney) on file with our office. We have also sent a copy to the Employee Plans Classification Manager in

Sincerely,

James E. Holland, Jr., Manager
Employee Plans Actuarial Group 1
Tax Exempt and Government Entities
Division

173

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace