PLR 200134017: Fuel credit rulings continue after conversion to LLC

Number
200134017
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
(Section 44 Redesignated as Section 29) Credits for Producing Fuel From a Nonconventional Source
Code sections
§ 29
Ruling dated
May 29, 2001
Publicly released
August 24, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A company asked whether its earlier private letter ruling on § 29 fuel production credits would continue to apply after it converted from a corporation to a limited liability company. It represented that all other material facts would remain the same. The earlier ruling, as quoted in this letter, addressed qualified coke fuels, production from specified facilities, and sales eligible for the credit, with a restriction on certain coke gas used to fire the facilities. The IRS ruled that those conclusions did not depend on the taxpayer's entity form, so the company could continue to rely on its earlier ruling after conversion. The letter warns that later regulations inconsistent with its conclusions could modify or revoke the ruling.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer continue to rely on its earlier § 29 fuel credit ruling after becoming an LLC?
  • Outcome: Approved, based on all other material facts remaining the same.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 29(a), (c)(1)(C), (f)(1)(B).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200134017
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 8/24/2001
Index Number: 29.00-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B07- PLR-119586-00
Date:
May 29, 2001

DO:

Legend

A =
B =

Dear

In a letter dated October 5, 2000 you requested a ruling that the Service confirm that PLR 9725044 will still be applicable to A after its conversion from a corporation to limited liability company. You represent that other than the change of form of A, all material facts will remain the same as described in PLR-9725044. The rulings received in that PLR are as follows:

1. Coke (including breeze) and coke gas are “qualified fuels” within the meaning of section 29(c)(1)(C) of the Code.

2. The Coke By-Products are ““qualified fuels” within the meaning of section 29(c)(1)(C) of the Code.

3. The Facilities, which were first placed in service after December 31, 1979 and before January 1, 1993, and are therefore capable of producing qualified fuels under section 29(f)(1)(B) of the Code, will continue to produce qualified fuels after transfer to the Taxpayer.

4. Production from the Facilities will be attributable to the Taxpayer within the meaning of section 29(a)92)(B) of the Code.

5. The sale of qualified fuels produced from the Facilities by the Taxpayer to B or any other unrelated person will qualify the Taxpayer to the credit for producing fuel from a nonconventional source under section 29(a) of the Code.
However, Taxpayer cannot claim the credit on any coke gas it sells to Seller and purchases back from B, whether or not blended with other gas, that is used to underfire the Facilities.
2

The above rulings are not dependant on the form of entity of the taxpayer. A may continue to rely on PLR 9725044 after it becomes a limited liability company.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer(s) requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Temporary or final regulations pertaining to one or more of the issues addressed in this ruling have not yet been adopted. Therefore, this ruling will be modified or revoked by the adoption of temporary or final regulations, to the extent the regulations are inconsistent with any conclusion in the letter ruling.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

Sincerely,
Joseph H. Makurath
Acting Branch Chief
CC:PSI:7

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace