PLR 200133008: Internet network access lines are outside the communications excise tax

Number
200133008
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Communications Tax (Taxable v. Not Taxable)
Topics
Code sections
§ 4251, § 4252, § 4291
Ruling dated
May 24, 2001
Publicly released
August 17, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A company built communication networks and sold internet service providers access to those networks. It bought primary rate interface lines connecting local exchange carriers to its modem bank, plus lines connecting the modem bank to its data network and the providers' services. The IRS concluded that these services did not provide local telephone service, toll telephone service, or teletypewriter exchange service as those terms are defined for the communications excise tax. The company's purchases were therefore not subject to the tax, and amounts paid by the internet providers for access were also outside the tax. The company had no collection obligation under section 4291 for those amounts.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Were the network line services and related access charges subject to the communications excise tax?
  • Outcome: Approved: the described payments were not subject to the tax.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 4251, 4252, 4291.

Full text (IRS public release)

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

Number: 200133008
Release Date : 8/17/2001
Index No.: 4251.00-00

CC:PSI:8/PLR-104339-01

MAY 24, 2001

In re:

Legend:

Taxpayer =

Dear

This is in response to a letter ruling request regarding Taxpayer’s responsibility for the excise tax imposed by § 4251 of the Internal Revenue Code on amounts paid for communication services. Your authorized representative submitted this request on your behalf. Taxpayer has represented the following.

Taxpayer builds communication networks and sells access to these networks to internet service providers (ISPs). ISPs provide their customers access to the ISPs’ services via Taxpayer’s communication networks.

To build the networks Taxpayer purchases from local exchange carriers (LECs) two types of line services. Taxpayer purchases local primary rate interface (PRI) line service between the LEC’s central office, where ISPs’ customers’ calls are received, and Taxpayer’s modem bank. This PRI line service is a one way line service that permits Taxpayer to receive, but not to initiate, voice and data transmissions. Taxpayer also purchases other line services that connect its modem bank to its data network and ultimately to the ISPs’ services (other line services). Taxpayer sells to ISPs access to these line services.

An ISP’s customers access the ISP’s services by calling via a modem into the LEC’s central office. The customer’s call is then routed to Taxpayer’s modem bank over a PRI line. At the modem bank, the customer’s call is routed over other line services to the Taxpayer’s data network and ultimately the ISP’s services.

Section 4251 imposes a tax on amounts paid for communications services. The term communications services means local telephone service, toll telephone service, -2-

and teletypewriter exchange service. Section 4251(a)(2) provides that the tax is paid by the person paying for the service. Under § 4291, the person receiving the payment for the service is responsible for collecting the tax from the person making the payment.

Section 4252(a) defines local telephone service as: (1) the access to a local telephone system and the privilege of telephonic quality communication with substantially all persons having telephone or radio telephone stations constituting a part of such local telephone system, and (2) any facility or service provided in connection with a service described in (1). The term local telephone service does not include any service which is a toll telephone service or a private communication service.

Section 4252(b) defines toll telephone service as: (1) a telephonic quality communication for which (A) there is a toll charge which varies in amount with the distance and elapsed transmission time of each individual communication and (B) the charge is paid in the United States, and (2) a service which entitles the subscriber, upon payment of a periodic charge (determined as a flat amount or upon the basis of total transmission time), to the privilege of an unlimited number of telephonic communications to or from all or a substantial portion of the persons having telephone or radio telephone stations in a specified area which is outside the local telephone system area in which the station provided with the service is located.

Taxpayer’s purchase of the PRI line service and the other line services do not provide Taxpayer with the privilege of telephonic quality communication with substantially all persons having telephone or radio telephone stations constituting a part of a local telephone system. Therefore, Taxpayer’s payments to the LECs for its line services are not amounts paid for local telephone service as defined in § 4252(a). Likewise, Taxpayer’s sale of access to these line services does not give ISPs the privilege of communication as defined in § 4252(a). Therefore, amounts paid by the ISPs to Taxpayer for access to these line services are not amounts paid for local telephone service as defined in § 4252(a).

Taxpayer’s purchase of the PRI line service and the other line services do not provide Taxpayer with telephonic communication for which there is a toll charge for each individual communication or the privilege of an unlimited number of telephonic communications to or from all or a substantial portion of the persons having telephone or radio telephone stations in a specified area that is outside the local telephone system area in which the station provided with the service is located. Therefore, Taxpayer’s payments to the LECs for its line services are not amounts paid for toll telephone service as defined in § 4252(b). Likewise, Taxpayer’s sale of access to these line services does not give ISPs the privilege of toll telephone service as defined in § 4252(b). Therefore, amounts paid by the ISPs to Taxpayer for access to these line services are not amounts paid for toll telephone service as defined in § 4252(b). Neither the amounts Taxpayer pays to the LECs for line services nor the amounts paid to Taxpayer by the ISPs for access to these line services are for teletypewriter exchange service as described in § 4252(c).
-3-

Accordingly, based on Taxpayer’s representations:

(1) Amounts paid by Taxpayer to the LECs for the purchase of PRI line service are not subject to the communications excise tax imposed by § 4251.

` (2) Amounts paid by Taxpayer to the LECs for the purchase of other line services from its modem bank to ISPs’ services are not subject to the communications excise tax imposed by § 4251.

(3) Amounts paid to Taxpayer by ISPs for providing access over the lines described above are not subject to the communications excise tax imposed by § 4251. Consequently, Taxpayer has no collection obligation under § 4291 with respect to these amounts.

This ruling letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it shall not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
By: Bernard Weberman
Assistant to the Branch Chief, Branch 8

Enclosures (2):
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace