PLR 200130031: Acquirer is not a successor to an acquired S corporation

Number
200130031
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Election by Small Business Corporation
Code sections
§ 1362, § 1361
Ruling dated
April 30, 2001
Publicly released
July 27, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A domestic corporation acquired and merged with an S corporation. None of the acquirer's shareholders owned the acquired corporation when the acquisition occurred, and a former shareholder later obtained less than a 2% interest in the acquirer. The IRS ruled that the acquirer was not a successor corporation under the regulation implementing IRC § 1362(g). That rule can delay a new S election after an earlier S election terminates. The ruling did not decide whether the acquirer itself qualified as a small business corporation or whether the acquired corporation's subsidiaries qualified as S corporation subsidiaries.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Was the acquiring corporation a successor corporation for the S election restriction?
  • Outcome: Approved: the acquirer was not a successor corporation on the submitted facts.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1362(g); Treas. Reg. § 1.1362-5(b).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200130031
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 7/27/2001
Index Number: 1362.00-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:Br.1-PLR-109222-01
Date:
April 30, 2001

X =

Y =

a =

b =

State =

D1 =

D2 =

D3 =

D4 =

This letter responds to a letter dated January 22, 2001, and subsequent correspondence, written on behalf of X, requesting that we rule that X is not a successor corporation of Y as defined by section 1.1362-(5)(b).

FACTS

According to the information submitted, X, a domestic entity, was incorporated under the laws of State on D1. On D2, X acquired all of the shares of Y, which was a corporation with a Subchapter S election in effect and which had made Qsub elections for its two subsidiaries, a and b. At the time of X’s acquisition of Y, none of the shareholders of X owned, directly or indirectly, any of the shares of Y. On D3, Y was merged into X. Subsequent to the merger, a previous shareholder of Y acquired less than a 2% interest in X.

2
PLR-109222-01

Law and Analysis

Section 1362(g) of the Code provides that, if a small business corporation has made an election under section 1362(a) and if such election has been terminated under section 1362(d), the corporation (and any successor corporation) is not eligible to make an election under section 1362(a) for any taxable year before its fifth taxable year which begins after its first taxable year for which the termination is effective, unless the Secretary consents to the election.

Section 1.1362-5(b) provides that a corporation is a successor corporation to a corporation whose election under 1362 has be terminated if 50 percent or more of the stock of the corporation (new corporation) is owned, directly or indirectly, by the same persons who, on the date of the termination, owned 50 percent or more of the stock of the corporation whose election terminated (the old corporation); and either the new corporation acquires a substantial portion of the assets of the old corporation, or a substantial portion of the assets of the new corporation were the assets of the old corporation.

Conclusion

Based solely on the information submitted, and the representations made, we conclude that X is not a successor corporation within the meaning of section 1.1362- 5(b).

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. Specifically, no opinion is expressed on whether X otherwise qualifies as a small business corporation under 1361(b) or that a and b otherwise meet the requirements of section 1361(b)(3).

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,
/s/ David R. Haglund
Senior Technician Reviewer,
Branch 1
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for section 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace