PLR 200130024: Former resident's Green Card surrender lacked a principal tax-avoidance purpose

Plain-English summary

A former U.S. long-term resident surrendered her Green Card after she and her retired husband returned to her birth country. Her net worth exceeded a threshold that could trigger a presumption of tax avoidance under the then-applicable expatriation rules. The IRS found her ruling request complete and made in good faith under Notice 98-34. Based on her submissions, it ruled that she would neither be presumed to have expatriated for a principal tax-avoidance purpose nor be treated as having done so. The ruling did not decide her other U.S. tax liabilities, and she had to attach a copy to her U.S. income tax return for the year she obtained it.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Did the surrender of her Green Card have a principal purpose of avoiding U.S. income, estate, or gift taxes?
• Outcome: Approved: no principal tax-avoidance purpose under the specified expatriation provisions.
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 877, 2107, 2501(a)(3); Notice 98-34.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200130024
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 7/27/2001
Index Number: 877.01-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
In re: CC:INTL:Br1-PLR-112602-01
Date:
April 27. 2001

A
=

Country B
=

Year l
=

Year 2
=

Year 3
=

Dear:

This is in response to your letter dated February 28, 2001, requesting a ruling that A’s surrender of her U.S. Alien Registration Card (Green Card) did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes under subtitle A or subtitle B of the Code. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

A was born in Country B in Year 1. In Year 2, A obtained a Green Card. A’s husband has now retired and the couple has returned to Country B. A surrendered her Green Card in Year 3. A will be subject to Country B tax on her worldwide income. On the date of A's expatriation, her net worth exceeded the amount set forth in section 877(a)(2).

Section 877 generally provides that a citizen who loses U.S. citizenship or a U.S. long-term resident who ceases to be taxed as a lawful permanent resident (individuals who "expatriate") within the 10-year period immediately preceding the close of the taxable year will be subject to the special rules of section 877(d) for such taxable year, unless such loss did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. Sections 2107 and 2501 (a)(3) provide special estate and gift tax regimes, respectively, for individuals who expatriate with a principal purpose to avoid U.S. taxes.

2
PLR-112602-01

A former U.S. citizen or former U.S. long-term resident will be treated as having expatriated with a principal purpose to avoid U.S. taxes for purposes of sections 877, 2107 and 2501 (a)(3) if the individual’s average income tax liability or the individual’s net worth on the date of expatriation exceed certain thresholds. See sections 877(a)(2), 2107(a)(2)(A) and 2501(a)(3)(B).

A former U.S. citizen whose net worth or average tax liability exceeds these thresholds, however, will not be presumed to have a principal purpose of tax avoidance if that former citizen is described within certain statutory categories and submits a request for a ruling within one year of the date of loss of U.S. citizenship for the Secretary’s determination as to whether such loss had for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. See sections 877(c)(1), 2107(a)(2)(B), and 2501 (a)(3)(C).

Under Notice 98-34, 1998-27 I.R.B. 30, modifying Notice 97-19, 1997-1 C.B.
394, a former long-term resident whose net worth or average tax liability exceeds the applicable thresholds will not be presumed to have a principal purpose of tax avoidance if that former resident is described within certain categories and submits a complete and good faith request for a ruling as to whether such loss had for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes.

Notice 98-34, requires that certain information be submitted with a request for a ruling that an individual’s expatriation did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes.

A is eligible to request a ruling pursuant to Notice 98-34 because she is a resident of Country B and her worldwide income is subject to Country B tax, the country in which she was born.

A submitted all of the information required to be submitted by Notice 97-19, as modified by Notice 98-34, including additional information requested by the Service after review of the submission.

Accordingly, based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that A has made a complete and good faith submission in accordance with section 877(c)(1)(B) and Notice 98-34. Therefore, A will not be presumed under section 877(a)(2) to have as one of her principal purposes for expatriating the avoidance of U.S. taxes. We further conclude that A will not be treated under section 877(a)(2) as having as one of her principal purposes for expatriating the avoidance of U.S. taxes because the information submitted clearly establishes the lack of a principal purpose to avoid taxes under subtitle A or B of the Code.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. In addition, no opinion is expressed as to A’s U.S. tax liability

3
PLR-112602-01

for the taxable years prior to or after her expatriation under sections of the Code other than sections 877, 2107, and 2501(a)(3).

A copy of this letter must be attached to A’s U.S. income tax return for the year in which A obtained the ruling (whether or not A is otherwise required to file a return).

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to A.

Sincerely,
W. Edward Williams
Senior Technical Reviewer
CC:INTL:Br1