PLR 200128022: Former resident rebuts expatriation tax avoidance presumption

Plain-English summary

A former long-term U.S. resident returned to her birth country and surrendered her green card. Her net worth exceeded the threshold that would otherwise trigger a presumption of tax avoidance. The IRS found that she made a complete, good faith submission under Notice 98-34, so the presumption under IRC § 877(a)(2) would not apply. The IRS did not decide whether tax avoidance was actually one of her principal purposes, which could still be determined from the facts and circumstances.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Does the former resident's submission rebut the presumption that she expatriated to avoid U.S. tax?
• Outcome: Approved as to rebutting the presumption; no opinion on actual purpose.
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 877, 2107, 2501(a)(3); Notice 98-34.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200128022
Release Date: 7/13/2001
Index No.: 877.01-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number

Refer Reply to

Date:
April 12, 2001

A
=

Date B =
Country C =
Date D =
Year E =

Dear
,

This is in response to a letter dated B, by A’s authorized representative requesting a ruling under section 877(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 ("Code") that A’s loss of long-term resident status did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes under subtitle A or subtitle B of the Code.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by penalty of perjury statements executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

A, a long-term resident of the United States within the meaning of section 877(e), returned to Country C and relinquished her U.S. lawful permanent resident status ("expatriated") on Date D. A is a citizen of Country C by birth. A became a permanent resident of the United States and obtained her green card in Year E. On the date of A’s expatriation, her net worth exceeded the threshold required under section 877(a)(2).

Section 877 generally provides that a citizen who loses U.S. citizenship or a U.S. long-term resident who ceases to be taxed as a lawful permanent resident (individuals who "expatriate") within the 10-year period immediately preceding the close of the taxable year will be taxed under section 877(b) and section 877(d) for such taxable year, unless such loss did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. Sections 2107 and 2501(a)(3) provide special estate and gift tax regimes, respectively, for individuals who expatriate with a principal purpose to avoid U.S. taxes.
PLR-104391-01
Page 2

A former citizen or former long term-resident will be treated as having expatriated with a principal purpose to avoid U.S. taxes for purposes of sections 877, 2107 and 2501(a)(3) if the individual’s average income tax liability or the individual’s net worth on the date of expatriation exceed certain thresholds. See sections 877(a)(2), 2107(a)(2)(A) and 2501(a)(3)(B).

Under Notice 98-34, 1998-2 C.B. 29, modifying Notice 97-19, 1997-1 C.B. 394, a former long-term resident whose net worth or average tax liability exceeds the applicable thresholds will not be presumed to have a principal purpose of tax avoidance if that former resident is described within certain categories and submits a complete and good faith request for a ruling as to whether such loss had for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. A is eligible to request a ruling pursuant to Notice 98-34 because on the date of expatriation, A was a resident and fully liable to income tax in Country C, the country where A was born.

Notice 98-34 requires that certain information be submitted with a request for a ruling that an individual’s expatriation did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. A submitted all the information required by Notice 98-34, including any additional information requested by the Service after review of the submission.

Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude that A has made a complete and good faith submission in accordance with section 877(c)(1)(B) and Notice 98-34. Therefore, A will not be presumed under section 877(a)(2) to have as one of her principal purposes for expatriating the avoidance of U.S. taxes.

However, because the information submitted does not clearly establish the existence or lack of a principal purpose to avoid taxes under subtitle A or B of the Code, no opinion is expressed as to whether A’s expatriation had for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of such taxes. While this ruling rebuts the presumption of tax avoidance under section 877(a)(2), it is not conclusive as to whether A subsequently may be found to have a principal purpose of tax avoidance under sections 877(a)(1), 2107(a)(1), and 2501(a)(3)(A) based on all the facts and circumstances. See section 877(c)(1).

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. In addition, no opinion is expressed as to A’s U.S. tax liability for taxable periods prior to her loss of permanent residence status or for taxable periods after his loss of permanent residence status under sections of the Code other than sections 877, 2107, and 2501(a)(3).

A copy of this letter must be attached to A’s U.S. income tax return for the year in which A obtained the ruling.
PLR-104391-01
Page 3

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to A’s representative.

Sincerely yours,

________
W. EDWARD WILLIAMS
Senior Technical Reviewer
Branch 1
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(International)