CCA 200126009: IRS cannot forgive a future payroll tax liability on hardship grounds

Number
200126009
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT: Basis for compromise
Code sections
§ 7121, § 7122
Ruling dated
March 20, 2001
Publicly released
June 29, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A business asked the IRS to forgive part of payroll taxes it expected to owe over an upcoming six month period. It cited financial hardship after a payroll agency embezzled funds. Chief Counsel agreed that the Code did not authorize forgiving a tax liability prospectively on hardship grounds. The proposal did not satisfy the rules for an offer in compromise, though the business could submit one through the established process. Counsel also said a closing agreement was inappropriate in these circumstances.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can the IRS forgive part of a future payroll tax liability because of hardship?
  • Outcome: Advice given: no authority for the proposed prospective forgiveness.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 7121, 7122.

Full text (IRS public release)

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

Number: 200126009 UIL 17.07.00-00 CC:PA:CBS:Br2 Releae Date: 6/29/2001 9999.98-00 GL-131964-00

March 20, 2001

MEMORANDUM FOR ASSOCIATE AREA COUNSEL
(SMALL BUSINESS / SELF-EMPLOYED)
Attention: Pamela Karr Harrison

FROM: Joseph W. Clark
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 2 (Collection, Bankruptcy & Summonses)

SUBJECT: : Request for Forgiveness of Tax
Liability

This constitutes our response to your request for comments on your draft memorandum regarding a taxpayer’s request for forgiveness of a future tax liability.
(the taxpayer), which does business in
, wrote to the
Commissioner requesting that its payroll tax liability for an upcoming six-month period be forgiven in part because an agency which handled payroll taxes for the taxpayer between and was convicted of embezzling the funds, a situation which has forced the taxpayer to struggle financially ever since. The taxpayer’s letter to the Commissioner was forwarded to your office, and you subsequently drafted a memorandum reflecting your views on the matter.

We agree with the view expressed in the memorandum, that the Internal Revenue Code (the Code) fails to provide the Service with authority to accept the arrangement proposed by the taxpayer, which would entail the Service’s forgiving approximately $ of a $ liability which has not yet been incurred. As the memorandum reflects, the taxpayer’s proposal as currently presented does not meet the standards for an offer in compromise pursuant to I.R.C. § 7122. If the taxpayer wishes to have the Service consider an offer in compromise, the taxpayer would need to comply with established procedures for consideration of offers. The Code does not authorize forgiveness of tax liabilities prospectively, on hardship grounds. While the Service does settle unassessed amounts by executing closing agreements, pursuant to I.R.C.
§ 7121, we do not believe that this is the type of situation in which use of a closing agreement would be appropriate.

Thank you for soliciting our advice on this matter. If you have further questions, please call 202/622-3620.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace