PLR 200125093: Foundation merger carries tax attributes without termination tax

Number
200125093
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Termination of Private Foundation Status
Code sections
§ 501, § 507, § 509, § 4941, § 4942, § 4945
Ruling dated
March 26, 2001
Publicly released
June 22, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Two private foundations with overlapping leadership planned to merge, leaving one foundation as the survivor. The IRS ruled that the transfer of all the other foundation's assets was a merger transfer under IRC § 507(b)(2) and would not impose a private foundation termination tax. The survivor would inherit the transferor's aggregate tax benefit and excess qualifying distribution carryover. The merger would not itself be self-dealing or a taxable expenditure. The transferor still had to meet its distribution requirements for the transfer year, but the ruling said its record keeping duty under section 4942(g)(3)(B) would not apply in the following year when it had no assets.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: What tax consequences would follow the merger and transfer of one private foundation's assets to another?
  • Outcome: Approved: the transfer, carryovers, and stated excise tax treatment were accepted on the represented facts.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 507(b)(2), 4941, 4942, 4945; Treas. Reg. § 1.507-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
200125093

Date: 3/26/01
S.I.N. 0507.00-00
S.I.N. 4941.00-00
S.I.N. 4942.00-00
S.I.N. 4945.00-00

Contact Person:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
ID Number:
XXXXXXXXXX
Telephone Number:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
T: EO: B3

Employer Identification Number: XXXXXXXXXXX

Legend:
Y= XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
U= XXXXXXXXXXX
V= XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Dear Applicant:

This refers to your letter dated September 29 , 2000, as supplemented by correspondence dated November 28, 2000, in which you and Y request certain rulings in connection with a proposed transaction under sections 507, 4941, 4942, and 4945 of the Internal Revenue Code. More specifically you and Y

requested us to rule:

  1. That the transfer by operation of law of the assets of Y to you pursuant to the merger
    constitutes a transfer of assets described in section 507(b)(2) of the Code and will not result in termination of Y's status as a private foundation under section 507(a) of the Code.

  2. That neither the transfer by operation of law of the assets of Y to you pursuant to the

merger, nor any subsequent notice of termination will result in the imposition of the termination tax under section 507(c) of the Code.

  1. That because you and Y are effectively controlled by the same persons, you will be treated
    as if you were Y for purposes of Chapter 42, section 507 and section 509 of the Code.

  2. That you will succeed to the aggregate tax benefit of Y.

  3. That as a result of the proposed merger, you will succeed to the excess qualifying
    distributions carryover of Y as of December 31, 2000.

  4. That the contemplated transaction will not constitute an act of self-dealing and therefore will
    not result in the imposition of tax under section 4941 of the Code.

  5. That the proposed transfer by operation of law of assets to you pursuant to the merger will not
    subject Y to any tax under section 4942(a) of the Code for a failure to distribute income.

  6. That Y will not be required to comply with the record keeping requirements of section
    4942(g)(3)(B) of the Code with respect to the transfer of assets to you pursuant to the merger

  • 2 -
    200125093

after the transfer by operation of law of all of its assets.

  1. That the contemplated transaction will not be a taxable expenditure under section 4945 of the
    Code and therefore will not subject Y to tax under section 4945 of the Code, nor will Y be required to exercise expenditure responsibility over the assets transferred to you.

Facts:

You were incorporated as a non-profit corporation, and received a determination letter from the Service recognizing you as exempt from federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Code.

Y was incorporated and received a determination letter recognizing it as exempt from federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Code. Both you and Y have been classified as private foundations.

U, a corporation, was your founder and is a substantial contributor to you. V, a corporation, was the founder of and a substantial contributor to Y. U and V merged with U being the surviving corporation. Thus, U is a disqualified person with respect to both you and Y.

Your president is also the president of Y. Your secretary is also the secretary of Y. Currently, all three of Y's directors serve on your seven member Board of Directors.

Your Board of Directors and Y's Board of Directors approved a plan of merger under which it was agreed that you and Y would merge, with you being the surviving foundation. Your Board of Directors and Y's Board of Directors concluded that the proposed merger would eliminate needless extra expenses associated with the operation of two foundations. Upon the merger, Y's separate corporate existence would cease, with you being the surviving foundation. All rights, privileges, immunities, powers, franchises and authority of Y would cease. All of Y's assets and liabilities would vest in you by operation of law without further act or deed. The merger agreement provides that the merger is to become effective as of a particular date. As of that date, Y's separate corporate existence will cease and all of Y's assets and property shall vest in you by operation of law.

Y represents that it intends to make sufficient qualifying distributions in 2000 to satisfy the distribution requirements imposed by section 4942 of the Code. Y represents that it has no outstanding expenditure responsibility grants under section 4945(h) of the Code. Y will notify the Service of its intent to terminate within the meaning of section 507(a) of the Code at least one day after all of its assets have been transferred to you.

Y represents that, upon the transfer of its assets to you, and its subsequent dissolution and liquidation, it will notify the Internal Revenue Service of such termination, liquidation and transfer. You will assume liability for any excise tax owed by Y on its investment income for the year of the distribution and any subsequent year. Also, Y will not treat any amount of the transferred assets as a qualifying distribution under Code section 4942(g).

You and Y represent that neither of you has committed any willful repeated acts giving rise to liability under Chapter 42 of the Code.

Law and Rationale:

  • 3 -
    200125093

A. Ruling #1 and Ruling #2

Section 507 of the Code provides that a section 501(c)(3) exempt organization's classification as a private foundation may be terminated in the ways described respectively in sections 507(a)(1), 507(a)(2), 507(b)(1)(A), and 507(b)(1)(B). Section 507 also concerns, under section 507(b)(2), the transfer of assets by one private foundation to another private foundation.

Section 507(b)(2) of the Code provides that, in the transfer of assets by one private foundation to one or more other private foundations as part of a reorganization, the transferee private foundation shall not be treated as a newly created organization.

Section 507(c) of the Code imposes on each organization referred to in section 507(a) a tax equal to the lower of (1) the amount which the foundation substantiates by adequate records as the aggregate tax benefit resulting from the section 501(c)(3) status of the foundation, or (2) the value of the net assets of such foundation.

Section 1.507-1(b)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides in part that a private foundation that wishes to terminate its private foundation status must submit a statement to the district director of its intent to terminate its private foundation status and that such statement must set forth in detail the computation and amount of tax imposed under section 507(c).

Section 1.507-3(c)(1) of the regulations indicates that a transfer under section 507(b)(2) of the Code includes a transfer of assets from one private foundation to another private foundation pursuant to a reorganization, merger or liquidation.

Section 1.507-3(d) of the regulations provides that a transfer of assets under section 507(b)(2) of the Code will not constitute a termination of the transferor's private foundation status.

Section 1.507-4(b) of the regulations provides that, with exceptions not involved here, the tax on termination of private foundation status imposed by section 507(c) of the Code does not apply to a section 507(b)(2) transfer of assets.

Your Board of Directors and Y's Board of Directors concluded that the proposed merger would eliminate needless extra expenses associated with the operation of two foundations. The transfers of assets from Y to you will be a transfer of assets described in section 507(b)(2) of the Code because the transfer of funds will be from one private foundation to another pursuant to a merger, as stated in section 1.507-3(c)(1) of the regulations. Under section 1.507-3(d), there is no private foundation termination tax in the case of section 507(b)(2) transfers from one private foundation to one or more other private foundations. If Y, subsequent to the merger, files a voluntary notice of intent to terminate its private foundation status pursuant to section 507(a)(1), such filing will not result in any termination tax under section 507(c) because the value of Y's assets at that time will be zero.

B. Ruling #3, Ruling #4 and Ruling #5

Section 1.507-3(a)(1) of the regulations provides that in the transfer of assets from one private foundation to another private foundation pursuant to a reorganization, merger, or liquidation, the

  • 4 -
    200125093

transferee private foundation shall not be treated as a newly created organization.

Section 1.507-3(a)(2)(i) of the regulations provides that a transferee organization to which this paragraph applies shall succeed to the aggregate tax benefit of the transferor organization. Such amount shall be an amount equal to the amount of such aggregate tax benefit multiplied by a fraction the numerator of which is the fair market value of the assets (less encumbrances) transferred to such transferee and the denominator of which is the fair market value of the assets of the transferor (less encumbrances) immediately before the transfer. Fair market value shall be determined as of the time of the transfer.

Section 1.507(a)-3(a)(2)(iii) of the regulations, Example (1), provides that:

Pursuant to a transfer described in section 507(b)(2), F, a private foundation, transfers to G, a private foundation, all of its assets which have a fair market value of $400,000. Immediately before the transfer F's aggregate tax benefit was $200,000, and G's aggregate tax benefit was
$300,000. After the transfer G's aggregate tax benefit is $500,000 ($200.000 +$300,000).

Section 1.507(a)-3(a)(8) of the regulations provides that certain tax provisions, listed therein, will carry over to a transferee private foundation that is given a Code section 507(b)(2) transfer of assets from a transferor private foundation.

Section 1.507-3(a)(9)(i) of the regulations provides that if a private foundation transfers all of its net assets to one or more private foundations which are effectively controlled (within the meaning of Sec. 1.482-1(i)(4)), directly or indirectly, by the same person or persons which effectively controlled the transferor private foundation, for purposes of chapter 42 (section 4940 et seq.) and part II of subchapter F of chapter 1 of the Code (sections 507 through 509) such a transferee private foundation shall be treated as if it were the transferor.

Section 1.507-3(a)(9)(iii) of the regulations, Example (1), describes a situation where the trustees of X charitable trust, a private foundation, formed Y charitable corporation, also a private foundation, in order to facilitate the conduct of their activities. The trustees of X are also the directors of Y. Y has the same charitable purpose as X. All of the assets of X are transferred to Y, and Y continues to carry on X's charitable activities. Under such circumstances, Y shall be treated as if it were X for purposes of subdivision (i) of this subparagraph. Thus, for example, Y will be permitted to take advantage of any special rules or savings provisions with respect to chapter 42 to the same extent as X could have if X continued in existence.

You and Y are effectively controlled by the same individuals within the meaning of section 1.482-1(i)(4)

of the regulations. The carryover provisions for a Code section 507(b)(2) transfer will be applicable. Similar to section 1.507-3(a)(2)(iii), Example (1), all of Y's aggregate tax benefit, as defined in section 507(d) of the Code, will be carried over to you, including Y's excess qualifying distribution carryover for the year 2000. In addition, under sections 1.507-3(a)(1) through (8), any other applicable carryover provisions will be applicable to you, the private foundation transferee.

C. Ruling # 6

Section 4941 of the Code imposes a tax upon any act of self-dealing between a private foundation and any of its disqualified persons as defined in section 4946.

  • 5 -
    200125093

Section 53.4946-1(a)(8) of the regulations provide that for purposes of section 4941 only, the term “disqualified person” shall not include any organization which is described in section 501(c)(3) (other than an organization described in section 509(a)(4)).

There will be no acts of self-dealing under section 4941 of the Code. The transfers of assets are not acts of self-dealing because they are transfers of funds for exempt purposes to another section 501(c)(3) organization, and, even if controlled by the same persons, the transferee is not considered a disqualified person pursuant to section 53.4946-1(a)(8) of the regulations.

D. Ruling #7 and Ruling #8

Section 4942 of the Code requires that a private foundation make qualifying distributions as defined in section 4942(g) in amount equal to its distributable amount as defined in section 4942(d).

Section 4942(g)(1)(A) of the Code indicates, in pertinent part, that a private foundation does not make any qualifying distribution under section 4942(g) where the contribution is either: (i) to another organization that is controlled by the transferor or by one or more of the transferor’s disqualified persons, or (ii) to any private foundation that is not an operating foundation under section 4942(j)(3), unless the requirements of section 4942(g)(3) are met.

Section 4942(g)(3) of the Code requires that a private foundation, in order to have a qualifying distribution for its grant to another private foundation, have adequate records to show that the transferee private foundation in fact makes a qualifying distribution that is equal to the amount of the transfer received and that is paid out of the transferee's own corpus within the meaning of section 4942(h). That transferee's qualifying distribution must be expended before the close of the transferee's first taxable year after the transferee’s taxable year in which the transfer was received.

Section 1.507(a)-3(a)(5) of the regulations provides that except as provided in subparagraph (9) of this paragraph, a private foundation is required to meet the distribution requirements of section 4942 for any taxable year in which it makes a section 507(b)(2) transfer of all or part of its net assets to another private foundation. Such transfer shall itself be counted toward satisfaction of such requirements to the extent the amount transferred meets the requirements of section 4942(g). However, where the transferor has disposed of all of its assets, the record keeping requirements of section 4942(g)(3)(B) shall not apply during any period in which it has no assets. Such requirements are applicable for any taxable year other than a taxable year during which the transferor has no assets.

Section 1.507-3(a)(9)(ii) of the regulations provides that subdivision (i) of this subparagraph shall not apply to the requirements under sections 6033, 6056, and 6104 which must be complied with by the transferor private foundation, nor to the requirement under section 6043 that the transferor file a return with respect to its liquidation, dissolution, or termination.

Under section 1.507-3(a)(5) of the regulations, even if a transferor transfers all of its assets to other private foundations, the transferor’s obligation to expend for exempt purposes, as required by section 4942(g) of the Code, must still be met for that year. Y is responsible for meeting its qualifying distribution requirements under section 4942 of the Code. Y represents that it will make sufficient qualifying distributions in the year 2000 to comply with the requirements of section 4942 of the Code.

Y is subject to the record-keeping requirements of section 4942(g)(3)(B) of the Code for the tax year of

  • 6 -
    200125093

the transfer of its assets to you. In the following tax year Y's separate corporate status will cease. Also, all of Y's assets will vest in you by operation of law, and you will succeed to the aggregate tax benefit of Y. The record-keeping requirements of section 4942(g)(3)(B) will not be applicable to Y in the following tax year because Y will have no assets. However, you will continue to be subject to the record-keeping requirements of section 4942(g)(3)(B).

E. Ruling #9

Section 1.507-3(a)(7) of the regulations provides that, except as provided in section 1.507-3(a)(9), where the transferor private foundation has disposed of all of its assets, sections 4945(d)(4) and 4945(h) of the Code shall not apply to the transferor or transferee foundations with respect to any “expenditure responsibility” grants made by the transferor foundation, except for any information reporting requirements imposed by section 4945 for any year in which any such transfer is made

Section 4945 of the Code imposes a tax upon a private foundation's making of any taxable expenditure as defined in section 4945(d).

Section 4945(h) of the Code defines expenditure responsibility in terms of the grantor private foundation requiring proper reports from the grantee private foundation on the grantee's uses of the grant. In pertinent part, section 53.4945-5(b)(7) of the regulations refers to the rules of section 1.507- 3(a)(7) of the regulations, cited above.

Sections 53.4945-6(c)(3) and 1.507-3(b) of the regulations allow a private foundation to make section 507(b)(2) transfers of its assets to organizations exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Code, not excluding private foundations, without the transfers being taxable expenditures.

There will be no taxable expenditures under section 4945 of the Code. Section 53.4945-5(c)(3) of the regulations indicates that no tax on taxable expenditures is involved where there is a reorganization transfer of assets under section 507(b)(2), which is the case here. Also, Y has no presently outstanding grants for which expenditure responsibility is being exercised.

Conclusions:

Accordingly, based upon the information furnished, and assuming that you will operate in the manner represented, we rule:

  1. That the transfer by operation of law of the assets of Y to you pursuant to the merger constitutes a
    transfer of assets described in section 507(b)(2) of the Code and will not result in termination of Y's status as a private foundation under section 507(a) of the Code.

  2. That neither the transfer by operation of law of the assets of Y to you pursuant to the merger, nor any
    subsequent notice of termination will result in the imposition of the termination tax under section 507(c) of the Code.

  3. That because you and Y are effectively controlled by the same persons, you will be treated as if you
    were Y for purposes of Chapter 42, section 507 and section 509 of the Code.

  • 7 -
    200125093
  1. That you will succeed to the aggregate tax benefit of Y.

  2. That as a result of the proposed merger, you will succeed to the excess qualifying distributions
    carryover of Y as of December 31, 2000.

  3. That the contemplated transaction will not constitute an act of self-dealing and therefore will not
    result in the imposition of tax under section 4941 of the Code.

  4. That the proposed transfer by operation of law of assets to you pursuant to the merger will not
    subject Y to any tax under section 4942(a) of the Code for a failure to distribute income.

  5. That Y will not be required to comply with the record keeping requirements of section 4942(g)(3)(B)
    of the Code with respect to the transfer of assets to you pursuant to the merger after the transfer by operation of law of all of its assets.

  6. That the contemplated transaction will not be a taxable expenditure under section 4945 of the Code
    and therefore will not subject Y to tax under section 4945 of the Code, nor will Y be required to exercise expenditure responsibility over the assets transferred to you.

If you have any questions about this ruling, please contact the person whose name and telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter.

This ruling letter is directed only to the organization that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. We are sending a copy of this ruling letter to your attorney as you requested.

Sincerely,

/s/

Robert C. Harper, Jr.
Manager, Exempt Organizations
Technical Group 3

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace