PLR 200125052: Revised nuclear decommissioning funding schedule approved

Number
200125052
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Revised Schedules
Code sections
§ 468A
Ruling dated
March 22, 2001
Publicly released
June 22, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An electric utility asked the IRS to revise the annual funding amounts for its qualified nuclear decommissioning fund. The utility supplied updated cost estimates, rates, and allocations among three regulatory commissions and a wholesale customer. The IRS concluded that the proposed schedule met section 468A's requirements and approved it for payments to the specified fund. The approval depended on the stated facts and assumptions, and later changes could require another revision. Payments to other funds or above the applicable decommissioning costs and ruling amounts would not qualify for the section 468A deduction.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the proposed revised schedule of nuclear decommissioning fund payments satisfy section 468A?
  • Outcome: Approved: the revised schedule for the specified fund, subject to the stated limits.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 468A; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.468A-3, 1.468A-6(e)(1).

Full text (IRS public release)

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

Number: 200125052
Release Date: 6/22/2001
Index Number: 468A.04-02

CC:PSI:6 –– PLR-106561-00

March 22, 2001

Re: Revised Schedule of Ruling Amounts

Taxpayer =

Parent =

State X =

Director =

Plant =

Location =

Commission A =

Commission B =

Customer =

Commission C =

Order A1 =

Order A2 =

Order A3 =
-2-
PLR-106561-00

Order A4 =

Rider =

Order B1 =

Order B2 =

Order C1 =

Order C2 =

Dear
:

This letter responds to your request dated March 13, 2000, and subsequent submissions, submitted on behalf of the Taxpayer. The request is for a revised schedule of ruling amounts under section 1.468A-3(i) of the Income Tax Regulations for the Taxpayer’s nuclear decommissioning fund (the "Fund") under the jurisdiction of Commission A, Commission B and Commission C. The Taxpayer was previously granted a revised schedule of ruling
amounts on
. The required information for the
schedule of ruling amounts was submitted on behalf of the Taxpayer pursuant to section 1.468A-3(h)(2).

The Taxpayer has represented the following facts and information:

The Taxpayer, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent, is incorporated in State X and is an operating utility providing electric service in State X. The Taxpayer is subject to the audit jurisdiction of the Director. The Taxpayer owns a percent undivided interest in the Plant, which is situated at Location. The operating license issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission expires at midnight on
. The jurisdictional percentage for each commission and Customer for
are as follows: Commission A, percent,
Commission B, percent, Commission C, percent and Customer, percent, for a total of percent. The
percent figure allocable to Commission B is derived by
multiplying a wholesale allocation factor of percent (approved in Order A2) by percent (the percentage of
-3-
PLR-106561-00

Taxpayer’s wholesale decommissioning collections covered by the Commission B formula rates, as discussed below.) The method for decommissioning the Plant is prompt removal/dismantling.

On
Taxpayer filed an annual revision of
Rider with Commission A. This revised was approved in Order A1 authorized amounts for decommissioning cost to be included in Taxpayer’s cost of service for ratemaking purposes,
effective
It also updated the projected
after-tax rate of return, the weighted average interest rate, trustee fees, and the inflation rates used for decommissioning.

The decommissioning costs for are based on the total estimated cost of decommissioning the Plant being $ , of which the Commission A jurisdictional portion is $ . This base cost escalated using a variable estimated inflation rate results in an estimated future
decommissioning cost of $
, of which the
Commission A jurisdictional portion is $
.

On
, Taxpayer filed an annual revision of
Rider with Commission A. This revised was approved in Order A2 authorized amounts for decommissioning cost to be included in Taxpayer’s cost of service for ratemaking purposes,
effective
It also updated the projected
after-tax rates of return, interest rates, trustee fees, and the inflation rates, used for decommissioning cost estimates.

The decommissioning costs for used in Order A2 were unchanged from Order A1, but were escalated using a redetermined variable estimated inflation rate and resulted in an estimated
future decommissioning cost of $
, of
which the Commission A jurisdictional portion is $ .

The wholesale formula rates used by Taxpayer since , were accepted for filing in Order B1. In , Taxpayer filed with Commission B predetermined charges under Taxpayer’s wholesale formula rates. This update to wholesale rates used the decommissioning costs that Commission A approved in their Order A1. Commission B authorized amounts for decommissioning costs to be included in Taxpayer’s cost of service for ratemaking purposes, effective
.

The decommissioning costs for are based on the total estimated cost of decommissioning the Plant being $ , of which the Commission B jurisdictional portion is $ . This base cost escalated using a variable -4-
PLR-106561-00

estimated inflation rate results in an estimated future
decommissioning cost of $
, of which the
Commission B jurisdictional portion is $ .

In , Taxpayer filed with Commission B predetermined charges under Taxpayer’s wholesale formula rates. This update to wholesale rates used the decommissioning costs
that Commission A approved in their
Commission B
authorized decommissioning costs to be included in Taxpayer’s cost of service for ratemaking purposes, effective

The decommissioning costs for and thereafter are based on the total estimated cost of decommissioning the Plant being $ , of which the Commission B jurisdictional portion is $ . This base cost escalated using a redetermined variable estimated inflation rate results in an estimated future decommissioning cost of $ , of which the Commission B jurisdictional portion is $ .

Rates for Customer, a wholesale customer of Taxpayer, are under the jurisdiction of Commission B and are set pursuant to Commission B’s formula rates, Order B2, developed for . Commission B in its included decommissioning costs for the Plant equal to the costs approved by Commission A in their
Order A3. Effective
, Customer began purchasing
power under a negotiated rate rather than Commission B formula rates. Consequently, amounts collected from Customer beginning on that date do not qualify as part of the cost of service amount applicable to the Fund, and Taxpayer’s revised schedule of ruling amounts includes a jurisdictional amount for Customer only for the first three months of .

The decommissioning costs for Customer are based on the total estimated cost of decommissioning the Plant being of which Customer’s jurisdictional
amount is
This total estimated cost escalated
annually at various rates of inflation results in a future total
estimated cost of
of which Customer’s
jurisdictional amount is

In Order C1, Commission C authorized decommissioning costs to be included in Taxpayer’s cost of service for ratemaking
purposes, effective
. Order C1 was based on
Commission A’s Order A1, and Commission A’s assumptions in regard to interest rates, assumed after tax rates of return, and rate of inflation.
-5-
PLR-106561-00

The decommissioning costs for are based on the total estimated cost of decommissioning the Plant being $ , of which the Commission C jurisdictional portion is $ . This base cost escalated using a variable estimated inflation rate results in an estimated future decommissioning
cost of $
, of which the Commission C
jurisdictional portion is $ .

In Order C2, Commission C authorized decommissioning costs to be included in Taxpayer’s cost of service for ratemaking
purposes, effective
. Order C2 was based on
Commission A’s Order A2, and Commission A’s assumptions in regard to interest rates, assumed after tax rates of return, and rate of inflation.

The decommissioning costs for are based on the total estimated cost of decommissioning the Plant being $ , of which the Commission C jurisdictional portion is $ . This base cost escalated using a redetermined variable estimated inflation rate results in an estimated future
decommissioning cost of $
, of which the
Commission C jurisdictional portion is $ .

The estimated period for which the Fund is to be in effect
is
and the estimated useful life of
the Plant is
. Thus, the Taxpayer
has calculated the qualifying percentage to be percent.

On
, Commission A issued Order A4. Order A4
cites the likelihood that Taxpayer’s application for extension of its operating license will be approved as a factor in its decision to reduce the amount of decommissioning costs to be collected during to zero. Since the amounts collected from customers under the jurisdiction of Commission B and Commission C are based upon the determinations of Commission A, the amount of decommissioning costs to be collected during from customers under the jurisdiction of Commission B and Commission C has also been reduced to zero. Consequently, Taxpayer has limited its request for a revised schedule of ruling amounts to the years
. At the present time there are no other proceedings pending before any of the commissions that would increase or decrease the amount of decommissioning costs to be included in Taxpayer's cost of service for ratemaking purposes.

Section 468A(a) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that a taxpayer may elect to deduct the amount of payments made to a qualified decommissioning fund. However, section 468A(b) limits -6-
PLR-106561-00

the amount paid into such fund for any taxable year to the lesser of the amount of nuclear decommissioning costs allocable to this fund which is included in the taxpayer’s cost of service for ratemaking purposes for the tax year or the ruling amount applicable to this year.

Section 468A(d)(1) of the Code provides that no deduction shall be allowed for any payment to the nuclear decommissioning fund unless the taxpayer requests and receives from the Secretary a schedule of ruling amounts. The "ruling amount" for any tax year is defined under section 468A(d)(2) as the amount which the Secretary determines to be necessary to fund that portion of nuclear decommissioning costs which bears the same ratio to the total nuclear power plant as the period for which the nuclear decommissioning fund is in effect bears to the estimated useful life of the plant. This term is further defined to include the amount necessary to prevent excessive funding of nuclear decommissioning costs or funding of these costs at a rate more rapid than level funding, taking into account such discount rates as the Secretary deems appropriate.

Section 468A(g) of the Code provides that a taxpayer shall be deemed to have made a payment to the nuclear decommissioning fund on the last day of the tax year if the payment is made on account of this tax year and is made within 2 ½ months after the close of the tax year. Additionally, a taxpayer that files for a schedule of ruling amounts and receives such schedule of ruling amounts after the 2 ½ month deadline for making a payment to a nuclear decommissioning fund, must make such payment to the fund within 30 days after the date that the taxpayer receives the schedule of ruling amounts for the tax year.

Section 1.468A-1(a) of the regulations provides that an eligible taxpayer may elect to deduct nuclear decommissioning costs under section 468A of the Code. An "eligible taxpayer," as defined under section 1.468A-1(b)(1) of the regulations, is a taxpayer that has a "qualifying interest" in, among other things, a direct ownership interest, including an interest as a tenant in common or joint tenant.

Section 1.468A-2(b)(1) of the regulations provides that the maximum amount of cash payments made (or deemed made) to a nuclear decommissioning fund during any tax year shall not exceed the lesser of (i) the cost of service amount applicable to the nuclear decommissioning fund for such tax year; or (ii) the ruling amount applicable to the nuclear decommissioning fund for such tax year. If the amount of cash payments made (or deemed -7-
PLR-106561-00

made) to a nuclear decommissioning fund during any tax year exceeds the limitation of paragraph (b)(1), the excess is not deductible by the electing taxpayer. In addition, under section 1.468A-5(c) there are rules which provide that the Internal Revenue Service may disqualify a nuclear decommissioning fund if the amount of cash payments made (or deemed made) to a nuclear decommissioning fund during any tax year exceeds the limitation of paragraph (b)(1).

Section 1.468A-3(a)(1) of the regulations provides that, in general, a schedule of ruling amounts for a nuclear decommissioning fund is a ruling specifying annual payments that, over the tax years remaining in the "funding period" as of the date the schedule first applies, will result in a projected balance of the nuclear decommissioning fund as of the last day of the funding period equal to (and in no event more than) the "amount of decommissioning costs allocable to the fund".

Section 1.468A-3(a)(2) of the regulations provides that, to the extent consistent with the principles and provisions of this section, each schedule of ruling amounts shall be based on the reasonable assumptions and determinations used by the applicable public utility commission in establishing or approving the amount of decommissioning costs to be included in the cost of service for ratemaking purposes. Under sections 1.468A-3(a)(3), the Internal Revenue Service shall provide a schedule of ruling amounts identical to the schedule proposed by the taxpayer, but no such schedule shall be provided by the Service unless the taxpayer’s proposed schedule is consistent with the principles and provisions of this section.

Section 1.468A-3(d)(2) of the regulations provides that, in general, the total estimated cost of decommissioning a nuclear power plant is the reasonably estimated cost of decommissioning used by the applicable public utility commission in establishing or approving the amount of these costs to be included in cost of service for ratemaking purposes.

Section 1.468A-3(d)(3) of the regulations provides that a taxpayer’s share of the total estimated cost of decommissioning a nuclear power plant equals the total estimated cost of decommissioning such plant multiplied by the taxpayer’s qualifying interest in the plant. Under section 1.468A-3(d)(4), the qualifying percentage for any nuclear decommissioning fund is equal to a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of tax years in the estimated period for which the nuclear decommissioning fund is to be in effect and the denominator of -8-
PLR-106561-00

which is the number of tax years in the estimated useful life of the applicable plant.

Section 1.468A-3(g) of the regulations provides that the Internal Revenue Service shall not provide a taxpayer with a schedule of ruling amounts for any nuclear decommissioning fund unless the public utility commission that establishes or approves the rates for electric energy generated by the plant has determined the amount of decommissioning costs to be included in the taxpayer’s cost of service for ratemaking purposes and has disclosed the after-tax rate of return and any other assumptions and determinations used in establishing or approving the amount.

Section 1.468A-3(i)(2) of the regulations provides that any taxpayer that has previously obtained a schedule of ruling amounts can request a revised schedule of ruling amounts. Such a request must be made in accordance with the rules of section 1.468A-3(h). The Internal Revenue Service shall not provide a revised schedule of ruling amounts applicable to a tax year in response to a request for a schedule of ruling amounts that is filed after the deemed deadline date for such tax year.

We have examined the representations and information submitted by the Taxpayer in relation to the requirements set forth in the section 468A of the Code and the regulations thereunder. Based solely on these representations, we reach the following conclusions:

1. The Taxpayer has a qualifying interest in the Plant and is, therefore, an eligible taxpayer under section 1.468A-1(b) of the regulations.

2. Commission A, Commission B, and Commission C have determined the amount of decommissioning costs to be included in the Taxpayer’s cost of service for ratemaking purposes as required by section 1.468A-3(g) of the regulations.

3. The Taxpayer has calculated the shares of the total decommissioning costs allocable to each of the Commissions, as required by section 1.468A-3(f)(2) of the regulations.

4. The Taxpayer has proposed a schedule of ruling amounts which meets the requirements of section 1.468A-3(a)(1) and (2) of the regulations. The annual payments specified in the proposed schedule of ruling amounts -9-
PLR-106561-00
are based on the reasonable assumptions and determinations used by Commission A, Commission B, and Commission C, and will result in a projected fund balance at the end of the funding period equal to or less than the amount of decommissioning costs allocable to the Fund for that jurisdiction.

5. The maximum amount of cash payments made (or deemed made) to the Fund during any tax year is restricted to the lesser amount of the decommissioning costs applicable to such Fund or the ruling applicable to this Fund, as set forth under section 1.468A-(2)(b)(1) of the regulations.

6. The qualifying percentage under section 1.468A-3(d)(4) of the regulations is calculated to be percent.

Based on the above determinations, we conclude that the Taxpayer’s proposed schedule of ruling amounts satisfies the requirements of section 468A of the Code. The following schedule of ruling amounts is specifically approved for the Commissions:

APPROVED REVISED SCHEDULE OF RULING AMOUNTS

COMMISSION B COMMISSION B
YEAR COMMISSION A WHOLESALE SALES (CUSTOMER) COMMISSION C TOTAL

Approval of the schedule of ruling amounts is contingent on there being no change in the facts and circumstances, known or assumed, at the time the current ruling is issued. If any of the events described in section 1.468A-3(i)(1)(iii) of the regulations occur in future years, the Taxpayer must request a review and revision of the schedule of ruling amounts. Generally, the Taxpayer is required to file such a request on or before the deemed payment deadline date for the first tax year in which the rates reflecting such action became effective. When no such event occurs, the Taxpayer must file a request for a revised schedule of ruling amounts on or before the deemed payment deadline of the 10th tax year following the close of the tax year in which the most recent schedule of ruling amounts was received.
-10-
PLR-106561-00

The approved schedule of ruling amounts is relevant only to those payments made to the Fund. Payments allocable to any funds other than the Fund, cannot qualify for purposes of the deduction under the provisions of section 468A of the Code. Payments made to such Fund can qualify only to the extent they are made while Taxpayer is the owner of the Plant and only to the extent that they do not exceed the lesser of the decommissioning costs applicable to such Fund or the ruling amounts applicable to this Fund in the tax year. In addition, payments made to the Fund with respect to the tax year in which the Plant was transferred to a related party are subject to the limitations contained in section 1.468A-6(e)(1).

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6ll0(k)(3) of the Code provides it may not be used or cited as precedent. Pursuant to section 1.468A-7(a) of the regulations, a copy of this letter must be attached (with the required Election Statement) to the Taxpayer’s federal income tax return for each tax year in which the Taxpayer claims a deduction for payments made to the Fund.

Sincerely yours,
Peter C. Friedman
PETER C. FRIEDMAN
Assistant to the Branch Chief, Branch 6
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosure:
6110 copy

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace