PLR 200120029: Taxpayer received more time for dual resident loss filings

Number
200120029
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Other; Dual Resident Corporation
Code sections
§ 1503, § 6110
Ruling dated
February 15, 2001
Publicly released
May 18, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer included part of an entity's losses in its consolidated U.S. tax returns but missed agreements and annual certifications required under the dual resident loss regulations. Its tax director had not filed them or told the taxpayer they were needed. The taxpayer sought relief before the IRS discovered the omissions. The IRS found that the taxpayer met the regulatory election relief standards and allowed 30 days from the ruling date to file the agreements for three tax years and certifications for two. The extension did not decide whether the taxpayer was otherwise eligible to file them.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer file late agreements and annual certifications under the dual resident loss regulations?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1503-2(g)(2), 301.9100-1, and 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200120029
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 5/18/2001
Index Number: 9100.22-00
Person to Contact:
1503.04-04
Gerard Traficanti ID#50-07355
Telephone Number:
(202) 622-3619
Refer Reply To:

In re: CC:INTL:PLR-116233-00
Date:
February 15, 2001

LEGEND
Taxpayer
=
Entity
=
Individual A
=
CPA Firm
=
Tax Years Ended
=

Dear :

This replies to a letter dated August 18, 2000, in which Taxpayer requests an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to file the agreement described in § 1.1503- 2(g)(2)(i) for the Tax Years Ended #1, #2, and #3, and to file the annual certification described in § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi) for the Tax Years Ended #1 and #2. Additional information was submitted in a letter dated February 5, 2001. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process.

In Tax Years Ended #1, #2, and #3, Entity generated losses, and a portion of the losses for each year were included in the consolidated U.S. federal income tax return of Taxpayer.

Individual A is the Tax Director of Taxpayer and failed to file the agreement and annual certification pursuant to § 1.1503-2(g)(2) for the Tax Years Ended #1, #2, and #3. Individual A also failed to advise Taxpayer that the agreements and annual certifications were necessary. Taxpayer did not file the agreements and annual certifications, and is requesting relief before the failure to file them is discovered by the Service.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.

2
PLR-116233-00

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in § 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, the agreement and annual certification are regulatory elections as defined in § 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100-1(c) to grant Taxpayer an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the rules set forth in § 301.9100-3(a).

Based on the facts and circumstances of this case, we conclude that Taxpayer satisfies the standards of § 301.9100-3. Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time until 30 days from the date of this ruling letter to file the agreement described in § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) for the Tax Years Ended #1, #2, and #3, and to file the annual certification described in § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi) for the Tax Years Ended #1 and #2. The granting of an extension of time to file the agreements and annual certifications is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to file the agreements and certifications. 301.9100 -1(a).

No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented.

A copy of this ruling letter should be associated with the agreements and annual certifications.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to the Taxpayer.

Sincerely,
/s/ Allen Goldstein
Reviewer
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (International)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace