PLR 200118050: Later stock offering does not affect earlier corporate separation rulings
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A company that had been spun off in an earlier distribution planned to sell additional common stock to raise capital more than 18 months later. The new shares would account for less than 20 percent of its stock after the offering. The company represented that it had no agreement or substantial negotiations about the offering at the time of the earlier distributions or within six months afterward. The IRS ruled that the stock offering was not part of a plan that included the earlier distributions under section 355(e). It also ruled that the new facts did not disturb its prior letters about those distributions.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Would a later public stock offering be part of the earlier distribution plan or change the prior rulings?
- Outcome: Approved: the offering was not part of that plan, and the prior rulings remain in effect.
- Key authorities: IRC § 355(e).
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Number: 200118050
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 5/4/2001
Index Number: 0355.00-00
Person to Contact:
Telephone Number:
Refer Reply To:
CC:CORP:4-PLR-115219-00
Date:
February 6, 2001
a
=
Date A
=
This letter responds to your August 7, 2000 request that we further supplement our letter ruling dated March 30, 1999 (PLR-121425-98) (the “Original Letter Ruling”), as supplemented by our letter rulings dated April 28, 1999 (PLR-107269-99), and July 20, 2000 (PLR-109312-00) (together, the “Prior Letter Rulings”). Capitalized terms not defined in this letter retain the meanings assigned them in the Prior Letter Rulings.
The Prior Letter Rulings address certain federal income tax consequences of the Distributions by Distributing 2 of the stock of Controlled A and Controlled B and related transactions.
Facts
To meet capital needs that have developed since the Distributions (which were completed more than 18 months ago), the management of Controlled A has determined that Controlled A should offer to the public a dollars of its common stock (the “Stock Offering”). Based on its Date A trading price, the Controlled A stock has appreciated more than 100 percent since it was distributed. The stock issued in the Stock Offering will represent less than 20 percent of the Controlled A stock outstanding immediately after the Stock Offering.
Representations
Controlled A makes the following representations:
(a) There was no agreement, understanding, arrangement, or substantial negotiations concerning the Stock Offering at the time of the Distributions or within six months thereafter.
(b) At the time of the Distributions, Controlled A had sufficient capital to meet its needs.
(c) Apart from the Stock Offering and the issuance of compensatory stock and
2
PLR-115219-00
options, Controlled A has no plan or intention to engage in any transaction with respect to its stock.
Distributing 2 reaffirms the following representations that appear in the Original Ruling Letter:
(fff) The Distributions are carried out for the following business purposes: to enable each Controlled Corporation (i) to attract, motivate, and retain key management and other employees by adopting separate ESOPs and providing compensation packages that include other equity incentives tied directly and exclusively to the stock of the Controlled Corporation and (ii) to solve operational problems inherent in the current corporate structure and enhance the Controlled Corporation’s performance and earnings by permitting its management to focus attention on smaller, strategically aligned markets and adopt strategies and pursue objectives that are appropriate to the unique characteristics and needs of local communities within those markets. The Distributions are motivated, in whole or substantial part, by one or more of these corporate business purposes.
(ppp) Neither Distribution is part of a “plan (or series of related transactions)” pursuant to which one or more persons will acquire directly or indirectly stock possessing 50 percent or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Distributing Corporation or either Controlled Corporation entitled to vote, or stock possessing 50 percent or more of the total value of all classes of stock of the Distributing Corporation or either Controlled Corporation, within the meaning of § 355(e).
Rulings
Based solely on the information submitted in the original and supplemental ruling requests and the representations set forth above, we rule as follows:
(1) The Stock Offering by Controlled A will not be considered part of a plan (or series of related transactions) that includes the Distributions, within the meaning of § 355(e).
(2) The Stock Offering and the additional information and representations contained in the supplemental ruling request will not adversely affect the Prior Letter Rulings, and the Prior Letter Rulings retain full force and effect.
Caveats
We express no opinion about the tax treatment of the transactions described above under any provision of the Code or regulations or the tax treatment of any condition existing at the time of, or effect resulting from, the transactions that is not specifically covered by the above rulings.
3
PLR-115219-00
Procedural Matters
This supplemental ruling is directed only to the taxpayers who requested it.
Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Each taxpayer affected by the Prior Letter Rulings should attach copies of those letters and this supplemental letter to the taxpayer’s federal income tax return for the taxable year in which the transactions covered by these letters are completed.
Under a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this supplemental letter will be forwarded to each of your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)
By: Wayne T. Murray
Senior Technician/Reviewer
Branch 4
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace