PLR 200118044: Later share sale leaves earlier separation rulings in force

Number
200118044
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Distribution of Stock and Securities of a Controlled Corporation
Code sections
§ 355, § 6110
Ruling dated
February 5, 2001
Publicly released
May 4, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A company separated in earlier stock distributions planned a public offering of new common shares to meet later capital needs. The offering would occur more than 18 months after the distributions, and the new shares would represent less than 20 percent of the company's outstanding stock afterward. The company represented that it had no agreement or substantial negotiations about the offering at the time of the distributions or within six months afterward. The IRS ruled that the offering was not part of a plan that included the earlier distributions under section 355(e). It also left the prior rulings on those distributions in force.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does the later stock offering form part of the earlier distribution plan or disturb the prior rulings?
  • Outcome: Approved: the offering was outside that plan, and prior rulings remained effective.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 355(e).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200118044
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 5/4/2001
Index Number: 0355.00-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:CORP:4-PLR-115079-00
Date:
February 5, 2001

a
=

Date A
=

This letter responds to your August 4, 2000 request that we further supplement our letter ruling dated March 30, 1999 (PLR-121425-98) (the “Original Letter Ruling”), as supplemented by our letter rulings dated April 28, 1999 (PLR-107269-99), July 5, 2000 (PLR-102442-00), July 20, 2000 (PLR-102440-00), August 2, 2000 (PLR-104655- 00) and September 22, 2000 (PLR-105635-00) (together, the “Prior Letter Rulings”). Capitalized terms not defined in this letter retain the meanings assigned them in the Prior Letter Rulings.

The Prior Letter Rulings address certain federal income tax consequences of the Distributions by Distributing 2 of the stock of Controlled A and Controlled B and related transactions.
Facts

To meet capital needs that have developed since the Distributions (which were completed more than 18 month ago), the management of Controlled A has determined that Controlled A should offer to the public a dollars of its common stock (the “Stock Offering”). Based on its Date A trading price, the Controlled A stock has appreciated more than 100 percent since it was distributed. The stock issued in the Stock Offering will represent less than 20 percent of the Controlled A stock outstanding immediately after the Stock Offering.
Representations

Controlled A makes the following representations:

(a) There was no agreement, understanding, arrangement, or substantial negotiations concerning the Stock Offering at the time of the Distributions or within six months thereafter.

(b) At the time of the Distributions, Controlled A had sufficient capital to meet its needs.

(c) Apart from the Stock Offering and the issuance of compensatory stock and

2
PLR-115079-00

options, Controlled A has no plan or intention to engage in any transaction with respect to its stock.

Distributing 2 reaffirms the following representations that appear in the Original Ruling Letter:

(fff) The Distributions are carried out for the following business purposes: to enable each Controlled Corporation (i) to attract, motivate, and retain key management and other employees by adopting separate ESOPs and providing compensation packages that include other equity incentives tied directly and exclusively to the stock of the Controlled Corporation and (ii) to solve operational problems inherent in the current corporate structure and enhance the Controlled Corporation’s performance and earnings by permitting its management to focus attention on smaller, strategically aligned markets and adopt strategies and pursue objectives that are appropriate to the unique characteristics and needs of local communities within those markets. The Distributions are motivated, in whole or substantial part, by one or more of these corporate business purposes.

(ppp) Neither Distribution is part of a “plan (or series of related transactions)” pursuant to which one or more persons will acquire directly or indirectly stock possessing 50 percent or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Distributing Corporation or either Controlled Corporation entitled to vote, or stock possessing 50 percent or more of the total value of all classes of stock of the Distributing Corporation or either Controlled Corporation, within the meaning of § 355(e).
Rulings

Based solely on the information submitted in the original and supplemental ruling requests and the representations set forth above, we rule as follows:

(1) The Stock Offering by Controlled A will not be considered part of a plan (or series of related transactions) that includes the Distributions, within the meaning of § 355(e).

(2) The Stock Offering and the additional information and representations contained in the supplemental ruling request will not adversely affect the Prior Letter Rulings, and the Prior Letter Rulings retain full force and effect.

Caveats

We express no opinion about the tax treatment of the transactions described above under any provisions of the Code or regulations or the tax treatment of any condition existing at the time of, or effect resulting from, the transactions that is not specifically covered by the above rulings.

3
PLR-115079-00

Procedural Matters

This supplemental ruling is directed only to the taxpayers who requested it.
Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Each taxpayer affected by the Prior Letter Rulings should attach copies of those letters and this supplemental letter to the taxpayer’s federal income tax return for the taxable year in which the transactions covered by these letters are completed.

Under a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this supplemental letter will be forwarded to each of your authorized representatives.

Sincerely,
Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)
By: Wayne T. Murray
Senior Technician/Reviewer
Branch 4

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace