PLR 200118023: Buying a disregarded LLC counts as receiving its real property

Number
200118023
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Exchange of Property Held for Productive Use or Investment
Code sections
§ 1031, § 6110, § 7701
Ruling dated
January 31, 2001
Publicly released
May 4, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer planned to acquire a single member LLC that owned replacement real property for a proposed like-kind exchange. The taxpayer wanted the LLC interest instead of a direct deed to avoid a local real estate transfer fee. Because the LLC was disregarded for federal tax purposes, the IRS ruled that acquiring its sole ownership interest would count as receiving the property directly for section 1031 purposes. The ruling applied only to qualifying like-kind property held for business or investment; other property would be taxable boot. The IRS did not decide whether the transaction otherwise met section 1031's requirements.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does acquiring the sole interest in a disregarded LLC count as receiving its real property in a section 1031 exchange?
  • Outcome: Approved on that question, subject to the property's qualification; non-like-kind property is taxable boot.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1031; Treas. Reg. §§ 301.7701-2(c)(2), 301.7701-3(c).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

P.O. Box 7604
Number: 200118023
Ben Franklin Station
Release Date: 5/4/2001
Washington, DC 20044
Index No.: 1031.00-00
Person to Contact:
J. Peter Baumgarten 50-00407
Telephone Number:
(202) 622-4950
Refer Reply To:
CC:DOM:IT&A:5 PLR-114061-00
Date:
January 31, 2001

Taxpayer =
XX
=
QI
=
State X =
RQ
=

RP
=

Dear

This responds to Taxpayer’s letter, dated July 19, 2000, and a supplemental submission dated August 24, 2000, requesting a private letter ruling as to the application of § 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) to the proposed transaction. Specifically, Taxpayer requests a ruling that acquisition of an exchange accommodator (QI), which, as an LLC, is a disregarded business entity for federal tax purposes, will be treated as the acquisition of qualifying like-kind replacement property.

QI is a single member LLC organized under the laws of State X. It has not elected to be classified as an association pursuant to §301.7701-3(c) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations. Its sole member is XX. To facilitate an exchange with Taxpayer of RQ for RP, QI acquired RP. RP consists of real property selected by Taxpayer, on which XX constructed improvements to Taxpayer’s specifications. The conveyance of RP to Taxpayer would be subject to a real estate transfer fee under State X law. However, the transfer of the ownership interest in an LLC, such as QI, to Taxpayer would not be subject to the real estate transfer fee. To avoid incurring a liability for the local real estate transfer fees incident to the transfer of RP by QI, Taxpayer proposes to simply acquire QI from XX.

Section 301.7701-2(c)(2) provides that, in general, a business entity that has a single owner and is not a corporation (as defined in § 301.7701-2(b)) is disregarded as an entity separate from its owner for federal tax purposes unless the entity elects to treat itself as an association for federal tax purposes. Because QI, as an LLC, will be disregarded as an entity separate from its owner, the receipt of the ownership of QI by -2-

Taxpayer is treated as the receipt by Taxpayer of RP owned by QI.

Accordingly, Taxpayer’s receipt of the sole ownership interest in QI, which owns RP, will be treated as the receipt of RP directly by Taxpayer for purposes of qualifying the receipt of such RP for nonrecognition of gain under § 1031.

The above ruling applies only to the extent property held by QI at the time it is transferred to Taxpayer is property of a like kind to RQ, to be held for use in Taxpayer’s trade or business or for investment. Non-like-kind property held by QI, if any, will be taxable to Taxpayer as boot. In addition, any other (non-like-kind) property transferred to Taxpayer, incident to this exchange, will be taxable boot to Taxpayer, regardless of whether Taxpayer first receives the ownership interest in QI. No determination is made by this letter as to whether the described transaction otherwise qualifies for deferral of gain realized under § 1031.

Except as specifically ruled above, no opinion is expressed as to the federal tax treatment of the transaction under any other provisions of the Code and the Income Tax Regulations that may be applicable or under any other general principles of federal income taxation. No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the transaction that are not specifically covered by the above ruling. This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer(s) who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be cited as precedent.

Sincerely yours,
Assistant Chief Counsel
(Income Tax & Accounting)
By Robert M. Casey
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 5 cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace