PLR 200114007: Late S election requires both spouses' consents
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Stock in a corporation was held through a trust in which a married couple had a community property interest. One spouse signed the intended S election, the other did not, and the form was also not filed on time. The IRS found reasonable cause for the delay and ruled that the corporation could be treated as an S corporation from its intended start date if it otherwise qualified. It required a completed Form 2553 with both spouses' shareholder consents and a copy of the ruling within 60 days. The IRS did not decide whether the corporation met the other S corporation eligibility rules.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Can the corporation receive S status despite late filing and a missing spousal consent?
- Outcome: Approved, conditioned on qualification and filing both consents within 60 days
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 1362(a)(2), 1362(b)(5); Treas. Reg. § 1.1362-6(b)(2)(iv)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Number: 200114007
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 4/6/2001
Index Number: 1362. 01-03
Person to Contact:
Rebekah A. Myers, 50-17508
Telephone Number:
(202) 622-3050
Refer Reply To:
CC:DOM:P&SI:1-PLR-110223-00
Date:
Dec 22, 2000
Legend
X =
Y =
Z =
T =
D1 =
D2 =
D3 =
This responds to a letter dated May 15, 2000, submitted on behalf of X, requesting rulings under sections 1362(b)(5) and 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Facts
Y and Z, a married couple in a community property state established T on D1.
Taxpayer represents that T is a grantor trust within the meaning of § 671 through 679 of the Code. X was incorporated on D2. T held shares in X. Due to state law restrictions, the agreement creating T1 named Y, as sole Trustee of T, as the shareholder of X.
Y, the sole shareholder of X, had intended that X be treated as an S corporation effective on D2. On D3, Y adopted a resolution to that effect. Although both Y and Z held an interest in T, Y signed Form 2553 and Z did not. Once executed, Form 2553 was not timely filed. X requests a ruling under § 1362(b)(5) that it will be treated as an S corporation effective on D2 and under § 1362(f) waiving the effects of X’s invalid § 1362(a) election.
Law and Analysis
Section 1362(a) allows a small business corporation to elect to be an S corporation. Section 1362(b) provides the rule regarding when such an election will become effective. Section 1362(b)(2) states, in relevant part, that if an S election is made within the first two and one-half months of a corporation’s taxable year then the corporation will be treated as an S corporation for the year in which the election is made. Under § 1362(b)(3), however, if an S election is made after the first two and one-half months of a corporation’s taxable year, then the corporation will not be treated as an S corporation until the taxable year after the year in which the S election is filed.
PLR-110223-00
2
Section 1362(a)(2) provides that an election to be an S corporation shall be valid only if all persons who are shareholders in such corporation on the day on which the election is made consent to such election. Section 1.1362-6(b)(2)(iv) adds that when stock of a corporation is held by a trust, both husband and wife must consent to any election if the husband and wife have a community interest in the trust property.
Section 1362(b)(5) allows the Secretary to treat a late election as timely and disregard § 1362(b)(3) where: (1) the election is made after the prescribed date, and (2) the Secretary determines that there was reasonable cause for the failure to timely make such election.
In the present situation, X did not timely file its election to be treated as an S corporation under § 1362(a)(1). X has, however, established reasonable cause for not making a timely S election and is entitled to relief under § 1362(b)(5). Had X timely filed the election under § 1362(b), it may have been invalid under § 1362(a)(2) for lack of Z’s signature, because Z holds a general community interest in T’s property, by way of marriage to Y.
Conclusions
Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, and provided that X otherwise qualifies as an S corporation, we conclude that X will be treated as an S corporation from D2. Within 60 days from the date of this letter, X should submit a properly completed Form 2553 with the shareholder consents from both Y and Z and a copy of this letter attached, to the relevant service center.
Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed or implied as to the federal income tax consequences of the transactions described above under any other provision of this Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed concerning whether X otherwise satisfies the S Corporation eligibility requirements.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer(s) requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being mailed to X.
Sincerely,
Dianna K. Miosi, Chief, Branch 1
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace