PLR 200111040: Extension granted for branch tax earnings election

Number
200111040
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Branch Tax
Code sections
§ 884
Ruling dated
December 18, 2000
Publicly released
March 16, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer missed the deadline for an election affecting its earnings and profits under the branch tax regulations. An employee had obtained one return filing extension, then sought an additional month without realizing the IRS could not grant it. The taxpayer filed the election with its return before the IRS discovered the missed deadline. The IRS found that the taxpayer met the standards for discretionary relief and extended the election deadline to the redacted date when the return was filed. It did not decide whether the taxpayer otherwise qualified to make the election.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer receive more time for an election to increase earnings and profits by an allocable amount from a shareholder?
  • Outcome: Approved, extending the election deadline to the stated redacted date.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.884-2T(d)(4) and 301.9100-1 through -3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200111040
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 3/16/2001
Index Number: 9100.22-00
Person to Contact:
884.00-00
Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:PLR-111096-00
Date:
December 18, 2000

LEGEND

Taxpayer
=
Shareholder
=
Year X
=
Date A
=
Date B
=
Individual A
=

Dear :

This replies to a letter dated May 31,2000, in which Taxpayer requests an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to Date B to file an election under § 1.884- 2T(d)(4)(i) to increase its earnings and profits by the allocable amount of the earnings and profits of Shareholder as determined under § 1.884-2T(d)(4)(ii). The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process.

The facts state that Individual A timely filed an application for extension on Form 7004 that extended the due date for Taxpayer’s Year X tax return to Date A. In the press of business, Individual A did not complete preparing Taxpayer’s return by Date A, and filed a request for an additional one-month extension on that date not realizing that the IRS had no authority to grant an additional extension of time. After it was discovered that the election statement was not timely filed, the election statement was subsequently filed with the Taxpayer’s Year X tax return on Date B. This request for relief is being made before the failure to make the election has been discovered by the IRS.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b) defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement. 2

PLR-111096-00

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time under the standards set forth in § 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 provides standards for extensions of time for making regulatory elections when the deadline for making the election is other than a due date prescribed by statute.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
§ 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, § 1.884-2T(d)(4)(i) fixes the time to make the election. Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100–1(c) to grant Taxpayer an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the standards set forth in § 301.9100-3(a).

Based on the facts and circumstances of this case, we conclude that Taxpayer satisfies
§ 301.9100-3(a). Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time to Date B to file an election under § 1.884-2T(d)(4)(i) to increase its earnings and profits by the allocable amount of the earnings and profits of Shareholder as determined under § 1.884- 2T(d)(4)(ii). The granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make the election. § 301.9100-1(a).

No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented.

A copy of this ruling letter should be associated with the Year X tax return.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.

Sincerely,
Allen Goldstein
Reviewer
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (International)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace