CCA 200106020: Taxpayer withdraws accounting method change request

Number
200106020
Outcome
Other outcome
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Change in Method of Depreciation Under Rev. Proc. 84-74
Code sections
§ 446, § 167, § 168
Ruling dated
November 3, 2000
Publicly released
February 9, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advised a district office that a taxpayer withdrew part of its Form 3115 request. The taxpayer had sought to change the accounting method for rental property from inventory treatment to depreciation. Counsel had communicated a tentatively adverse position, and the taxpayer also said a decline in the relevant business made the request outdated. The memorandum states that Counsel did not view the property as covered by the cited ruling on video cassette rentals or by section 168(f)(3). It records a withdrawal, not a final ruling on the requested method change.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: What happened to the requested change from inventory accounting to depreciation for rental property?
  • Outcome: Other, the taxpayer withdrew that issue from Form 3115.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 167, 168(f)(3); Rev. Rul. 89-62.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
I N T E R N AL R E V E N U E S E R V I C E WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

Number: 200106020
November 3,2000
Release Date: 2/9/2001
CC:PSI:6
UIL: 446.04-19
CAM-78787-92

MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRICT DIRECT,
DISTRICT

Attn: Chief, Examination Division

FROM: Branch Chief, Branch 6, Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
(CC:PSI:6)

SUBJECT: Withdrawal of Application for Change in Method of
Accounting

In accordance with section 8.07(2)(a) of Rev. Proc. 2000-1, 2000-1 I.R.B. 4, 33, this memorandum advises you that a taxpayer within your district has withdrawn one of the issues set forth in its Form 3115, Application for Change in Accounting Method. This document is not to be used or cited as precedent.

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

This memorandum is Chief Counsel Advice and is open to public inspection pursuant to the provisions of § 6110(i) of the Internal Revenue Code. The provisions of § 6110 require the Internal Revenue Service to remove taxpayer identifying information and provide the taxpayer with notice of intention to disclose before it is made available for public inspection. Section 6110(c) and (i). Section 6110(i)(3)(B) also authorizes the Service to delete information from this memorandum that is protected from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. § 552 (b) and (c) before the document is provided to the taxpayer with notice of intention to disclose. Only the National Office function issuing this memorandum is authorized to make such deletions and to make the redacted document available for public inspection. Accordingly, the Examination, Appeals, or Counsel recipient of this document may not provide a copy of this unredacted document to the taxpayer or their representative. The recipient of this document may share this unredacted document only with those persons whose official tax administration duties with respect to the case and the issues discussed in the document require inspection or disclosure of this memorandum.

2
CAM-78787-92

LEGEND:

B =

a =

b =

This memorandum advises you that one the issue set forth in a Form 3115, dated a, filed on behalf of B, is withdrawn. B withdrew the issue after we advised B of our tentatively adverse position and also due to a change in its business operations. B indicates its business in rentals and sales of b has declined substantially since the time the Form 3115 was filed so that its current business makes its request outdated.

Specifically, B withdrew the request to change the method of accounting for rental b from an inventory method to a depreciation method. B believed that it could use a section 167 depreciation method analogous to that for video cassette rentals set forth in Rev. Rul. 89-62, 1989-1 C.B. 78. These changes would have been effective beginning with the taxable year beginning a.

Rev. Rul. 89-62 specifically states that video cassettes are depreciable under section 167 of the Code in accordance with the straight line method or the income forecast method. We do not view b as coming within the scope of Rev. Rul. 89-62 nor encompassed within the provisions of section 168(f)(3).

If you have any questions on this matter, do not hesitate to call (202) 622-3110.

/s/ Charles B. Ramsey

Charles B. Ramsey

cc:
Changes in Methods of Accounting
Industry Specialist

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace