PLR 200103014: Late accounting period change request treated as timely

Number
200103014
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Section 442; Accounting Periods
Code sections
§ 442
Ruling dated
October 12, 2000
Publicly released
January 19, 2001

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2001, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2001
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Taxpayers missed the deadline to file Form 1128 for a change in their tax year, citing a miscommunication. The IRS found that they acted reasonably and in good faith and that an extension would not prejudice the government. It treated their late Form 1128 as timely filed under the regulatory relief rules. The IRS did not decide whether the requested tax year change itself was permitted; the form still had to be processed under the applicable procedure.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can the late Form 1128 requesting an accounting period change be treated as timely filed?
  • Outcome: Approved for filing deadline relief only.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.442-1(b), 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2000-11.

Full text (IRS public release)

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

Number: 200103014
Release Date: 1/19/2001
Index Nos.: 9100.09-00

CC:IT&A:B9 PLR-111723-00
October 12, 2000
Attn:

EIN:
Dear

This is in reference to a Form 1128, Application to Adopt, Change, or Retain a Tax Year, submitted on behalf of (the taxpayers), requesting
permission to change their accounting period, for federal income tax purposes, from a taxable year ending , to a taxable year ending effective . The taxpayers have requested that the Form 1128 be considered timely filed under the authority contained in § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations.
The taxpayers informed the national office that due to a miscommunication, they failed to timely file a Form 1128 to change their tax year under the automatic provisions of Rev. Proc. 2000-11, 2000-3 I.R.B. 309.

This ruling letter is based upon a representation by the taxpayers that they are not using hindsight, as defined in § 301.9100-3(b)(3)(iii) in requesting relief.

Section 1.442-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that in order to secure the Commissioner's consent to a change in accounting period, the taxpayer must file an application on Form 1128 with the Commissioner on or before the 15th day of the second calendar month following the close of the short period. Section 6.01(2) of Rev. Proc. 2000-11 states, in part, that a Form 1128 filed pursuant to this revenue procedure will be considered timely filed for purposes of § 1.442-1 (b)(1) if and only if, it is filed on or before the time (including extensions) for filing the return for the short period required by such change.

Section 301.9100-3(a) of the regulations provides that requests for extensions of time for regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2 (automatic extensions), such as the instant case, must be made under the rules of § 301.9100-3. Requests for relief subject to § 301.9100-3 will be -2-

granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, it is held that the taxpayers have acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly, the requirements of the regulations for the granting of relief have been satisfied in this case, and the late filed Form 1128 requesting permission to change to a tax year ending
effective
, is considered timely filed.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayers and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as part of an examination process.

This ruling addresses the granting of § 301.9100-3 relief only. No opinion is expressed regarding the tax treatment of the instant transaction under the provisions of any other sections of the Code or regulations that may be applicable thereto, or regarding the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the instant transaction. Specifically, no opinion is expressed as to whether the taxpayers are permitted under the Code and applicable regulations to change to the tax year requested in the subject Form 1128.

A copy of this letter ruling and the Form 1128 are being forwarded to the service center where the taxpayers file their consolidated federal income tax returns with instructions that the Form 1128 be considered timely filed, and processed in accordance with established procedures under Rev. Proc. 2000-11.

In accordance with the provisions of a power of attorney currently on file, we are sending a copy of this letter ruling to the taxpayers’ authorized representative.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayers that requested it. Section 6110(j)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely yours,
Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax and Accounting)
Heather Maloy
Enclosures:
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace