PLR 200052034: Former long-term resident's departure lacked tax avoidance purpose

Plain-English summary

A former long-term U.S. resident gave up her lawful permanent resident status. Her net worth exceeded the threshold that could create a presumption of tax avoidance under the law then in effect. She requested a ruling under Notice 98-34 and supplied the required information, including facts tying her to the country where she was born and would be fully taxed. The IRS found her submission complete and in good faith, removed the presumption, and concluded that avoiding U.S. taxes was not one of the principal purposes of her departure. The letter required her to attach a copy of the ruling to her U.S. income tax return for the ruling year.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Did the former resident's loss of U.S. long-term resident status have a principal purpose of avoiding U.S. taxes?
• Outcome: Approved; the IRS found no principal tax avoidance purpose on the submitted facts.
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 877(a)(2), 877(c), 2107, 2501(a)(3); Notice 98-34.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200052034
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 12/29/2000
Index Number: 877.08-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Re
Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:BR1:PLR-113445-00
Date:
September 29, 2000

DO: TY:

A
=
Country B =
Date C =
Date D =
Year E =

Dear:

This is in response to a letter dated May 9, 2000, as supplemented by a letter dated August 23, 2000, submitted by A’s authorized representative requesting a ruling, under section 877(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 ("Code"), that A’s loss of long-term resident status did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes under subtitle A or subtitle B of the Code. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by penalty of perjury statements executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

A, a former long-term resident of the United States within the meaning of section 877(e), relinquished her U.S. lawful permanent resident status ("expatriated") on Date C. A is a citizen of Country B by reason of her birth on Date D in Country B. A's parents were also born in Country B. A became a lawful permanent resident of the United States in Year E. On the date of A’s expatriation, her net worth exceeded the applicable threshold in section 877.

Section 877 generally provides that a citizen who loses U.S. citizenship or a U.S. long- term resident who ceases to be taxed as a lawful permanent resident (individuals who "expatriate") within the 10-year period immediately preceding the close of the taxable year will be taxed under section 877(b) and the special rules of section 877(d) for such taxable year, unless such loss did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. Sections 2107 and 2501(a)(3) provide special estate and gift tax regimes, respectively, for individuals who expatriate with a principal purpose to avoid U.S. taxes.

2
PLR-113445-00

A former citizen or former long term-resident will be presumed to have expatriated with a principal purpose to avoid U.S. taxes for purposes of sections 877, 2107 and 2501(a)(3) if the individual’s average income tax liability or the individual’s net worth on the date of expatriation exceeds certain thresholds. See sections 877(a)(2), 2107(a)(2)(A) and 2501(a)(3)(B).

A former U.S. citizen whose net worth or average tax liability exceeds these thresholds, however, will not be presumed to have a principal purpose of tax avoidance if that former citizen is described within certain statutory categories and submits a request for a ruling within one year of the date of loss of U.S. citizenship for the Secretary’s determination as to whether such loss had for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. See sections 877(c)(1), 2107(a)(2)(B), and 2501(a)(3)(C).

Under Notice 98-34, 1998-27 I.R.B. 30, modifying Notice 97-19, 1997-1 C.B. 394, an eligible former long-term resident whose net worth or average tax liability exceeds the applicable thresholds will also not be presumed to have a principal purpose of tax avoidance if that former long-term resident is described within certain categories and submits a complete and good faith request for a ruling as to whether such loss had for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes.

Notice 98-34 requires that certain information be submitted with a request for a ruling that an individual’s expatriation did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes.

A is eligible to request a ruling pursuant to Notice 98-34 because she is described in three categories of individuals eligible to submit ruling requests. First, within a reasonable period after A’s expatriation, A will be a resident fully liable to income tax in Country B, the country where A was born. Second, within a reasonable period after A’s expatriation, A will be a resident fully liable to income tax in Country B, the country where A’s spouse was born. Third, A is eligible to submit a request because within a reasonable period after her expatriation, A will be a resident fully liable to tax in Country B, the country where her parents were born.

A submitted all the information required by Notice 98-34, including any additional information requested by the Service after review of the submission.

Accordingly, based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, it is held that A has made a complete and good faith submission in accordance with section 877(c)(1)(B) and Notice 98-34, and therefore, A will not be presumed to have expatriated with a principal purpose of tax avoidance.

It is further concluded that A will not be treated under section 877(a)(2) as having as one of her principal purposes of expatriating the avoidance of U.S. taxes, because the information submitted clearly established the lack of a principal purpose to avoid taxes under subtitle A or B of the Code.

A copy of this letter must be attached to A's U.S. income tax return for the year in which A obtained the ruling (whether or not A is otherwise required to file a return).

3
PLR-113445-00

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to A’s authorized representative.

Sincerely,
W. Edward Williams
Senior Technical Reviewer
CC:INTL:Br1 cc:
Assistant Commissioner (International)
International District Operations
OP:IN:D